One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: UncleJesse
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 213 next>>
Oct 7, 2016 20:38:09   #
archie bunker wrote:
I agree. Of course a pap smear my not be a bad idea just to be sure. you never know!


Actually folks, HHS asked the AMA which preventive things give the biggest results and that pay for themselves by diagnosing and treating before serious problems if covered at no cost. The AMA told HHS things like...

15 Covered Preventive Services for Adults
1.Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm one-time screening for men of specified ages who have ever smoked
2.Alcohol Misuse screening and counseling
3.Aspirin use for men and women of certain ages
4.Blood Pressure screening for all adults
5.Cholesterol screening for adults of certain ages or at higher risk
6.Colorectal Cancer screening for adults over 50
7.Depression screening for adults
8.Type 2 Diabetes screening for adults with high blood pressure
9.Diet counseling for adults at higher risk for chronic disease
10.HIV screening for all adults at higher risk
11.Immunization v*****es for adults--doses, recommended ages, and recommended populations vary: ◦Hepatitis A
◦Hepatitis B
◦Herpes Zoster
◦Human Papillomav***s
◦Influenza (Flu Shot)
◦Measles, Mumps, Rubella
◦Meningococcal
◦Pneumococcal
◦Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis
◦Varicella

12.Obesity screening and counseling for all adults
13.Sexually T***smitted Infection (STI) prevention counseling for adults at higher risk
14.Tobacco Use screening for all adults and cessation interventions for tobacco users
15.Syphilis screening for all adults at higher risk

HHS Home > Health Care > Facts & Features > Fact Sheets > Preventive Services Covered Under the ACA

Preventive Services Covered Under the Affordable Care Act





15 Covered Preventive Services for Adults
1.Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm one-time screening for men of specified ages who have ever smoked
2.Alcohol Misuse screening and counseling
3.Aspirin use for men and women of certain ages
4.Blood Pressure screening for all adults
5.Cholesterol screening for adults of certain ages or at higher risk
6.Colorectal Cancer screening for adults over 50
7.Depression screening for adults
8.Type 2 Diabetes screening for adults with high blood pressure
9.Diet counseling for adults at higher risk for chronic disease
10.HIV screening for all adults at higher risk
11.Immunization v*****es for adults--doses, recommended ages, and recommended populations vary: ◦Hepatitis A
◦Hepatitis B
◦Herpes Zoster
◦Human Papillomav***s
◦Influenza (Flu Shot)
◦Measles, Mumps, Rubella
◦Meningococcal
◦Pneumococcal
◦Tetanus, Diphtheria, Pertussis
◦Varicella
Learn more about immunizations and see the latest v*****e schedules.

12.Obesity screening and counseling for all adults
13.Sexually T***smitted Infection (STI) prevention counseling for adults at higher risk
14.Tobacco Use screening for all adults and cessation interventions for tobacco users
15.Syphilis screening for all adults at higher risk

22 Covered Preventive Services for Women, Including Pregnant Women

The eight new prevention-related health services marked with an asterisk ( * ) must be covered with no cost-sharing
1.Anemia screening on a routine basis for pregnant women
2.Bacteriuria urinary tract or other infection screening for pregnant women
3.BRCA counseling about genetic testing for women at higher risk
4.Breast Cancer Mammography screenings every 1 to 2 years for women over 40
5.Breast Cancer Chemoprevention counseling for women at higher risk
6.Breastfeeding comprehensive support and counseling from trained providers, as well as access to breastfeeding supplies, for pregnant and nursing women*
7.Cervical Cancer screening for sexually active women
8.Chlamydia Infection screening for younger women and other women at higher risk
9.Contraception: Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling, not including abortifacient drugs*
10.Domestic and interpersonal violence screening and counseling for all women*
11.Folic Acid supplements for women who may become pregnant
12.Gestational diabetes screening for women 24 to 28 weeks pregnant and those at high risk of developing gestational diabetes*
13.Gonorrhea screening for all women at higher risk
14.Hepatitis B screening for pregnant women at their first prenatal visit
15.Human Immunodeficiency V***s (HIV) screening and counseling for sexually active women*
16.Human Papillomav***s (HPV) DNA Test: high risk HPV DNA testing every three years for women with normal cytology results who are 30 or older*
17.Osteoporosis screening for women over age 60 depending on risk factors
18.Rh Incompatibility screening for all pregnant women and follow-up testing for women at higher risk
19.Tobacco Use screening and interventions for all women, and expanded counseling for pregnant tobacco users
20.Sexually T***smitted Infections (STI) counseling for sexually active women*
21.Syphilis screening for all pregnant women or other women at increased risk
22.Well-woman visits to obtain recommended preventive services*

26 Covered Preventive Services for Children
1.Alcohol and Drug Use assessments for adolescents
2.Autism screening for children at 18 and 24 months
3.Behavioral assessments for children of all ages
Ages: 0 to 11 months, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 10 years, 11 to 14 years, 15 to 17 years.
4.Blood Pressure screening for children
Ages: 0 to 11 months, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 10 years, 11 to 14 years, 15 to 17 years.
5.Cervical Dysplasia screening for sexually active females
6.Cong*****l Hypothyroidism screening for newborns
7.Depression screening for adolescents
8.Developmental screening for children under age 3, and surveillance throughout childhood
9.Dyslipidemia screening for children at higher risk of lipid disorders
Ages: 1 to 4 years, 5 to 10 years, 11 to 14 years, 15 to 17 years.
10.Fluoride Chemoprevention supplements for children without fluoride in their water source
11.Gonorrhea preventive medication for the eyes of all newborns
12.Hearing screening for all newborns
13.Height, Weight and Body Mass Index measurements for children
Ages: 0 to 11 months, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 10 years, 11 to 14 years, 15 to 17 years.
14.Hematocrit or Hemoglobin screening for children
15.Hemoglobinopathies or sickle cell screening for newborns
16.HIV screening for adolescents at higher risk
17.Immunization v*****es for children from birth to age 18 —doses, recommended ages, and recommended populations vary: ◦Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis
◦Haemophilus influenzae type b
◦Hepatitis A
◦Hepatitis B
◦Human Papillomav***s
◦Inactivated Poliov***s
◦Influenza (Flu Shot)
◦Measles, Mumps, Rubella
◦Meningococcal
◦Pneumococcal
◦Rotav***s
◦Varicella
Learn more about immunizations and see the latest v*****e schedules.

18.Iron supplements for children ages 6 to 12 months at risk for anemia
19.Lead screening for children at risk of exposure
20.Medical History for all children throughout development
Ages: 0 to 11 months, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 10 years, 11 to 14 years, 15 to 17 years.
21.Obesity screening and counseling
22.Oral Health risk assessment for young children
Ages: 0 to 11 months, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 10 years.
23.Phenylketonuria (PKU) screening for this genetic disorder in newborns
24.Sexually T***smitted Infection (STI) prevention counseling and screening for adolescents at higher risk
25.Tuberculin testing for children at higher risk of tuberculosis
Ages: 0 to 11 months, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 10 years, 11 to 14 years, 15 to 17 years.
26.Vision screening for all children
Go to
Oct 7, 2016 20:26:16   #
archie bunker wrote:
If you like your Doctor, you can keep your Doctor. If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.
Every family will save $2500.00 a year under my plan. Who said that over, and over? Nuff said!!!!!!!!!


That's still true. If you like your doctor, keep going to him. No one is holding a gun to your head outlawing you from going to see this doctor you have to have. But he sure got that one wrong about keeping your plan. Never in history did an insurer ever keep the same plan from one year to another. For the past 30 years, they always changed the plan to show how much more it was going to cost next year and which doctors they wouldn't pay for (but you can still go to if you want to pay his fee on your own).

BTW, the $2,500 savings was wrong but is way too low...turns out that the average Obamacare subsidy is $276/mo or $3,312. The funny part is how so many people believed he was talking about the average family not the average Obamacare subsidized family.
Go to
Oct 7, 2016 20:19:08   #
son of witless wrote:
Obamacare was like a late night infomercial. It would insure millions of uninsured at no cost to me, cut the insurance premiums of the rest of us by hundreds and thousands of dollars, cure the common cold, eliminate World Hunger, make the terrorists love us, give you more energy, make you lose 50 pounds of belly fat, make the lame walk, and cure your erectile dysfunction, or your money back. I want my damn money back.


Sorry, no CODs, no refunds and not responsible for damages incurred.
That was all done to sugar coat the fact that it is really a way to insure the uninsurable and the uninsured who don't qualify for Medicaid or Medicare and can't afford to buy it.
For the majority, there has been some benefit such as no charge for a lot of preventive medicines but no one is sending them a statement saying look how much money you saved on that...we only see the higher premium and deductible. Now, to be fair, it was going up like that before Obamacare came along anyways.
Go to
Oct 7, 2016 20:08:59   #
tdsrnest wrote:
I am so s**k of you h**eful pieces of garbage when it comes to Obamcare.

Let me explain something to you h**e filled r****t. My son has an incurable Kidney disease. He is on ....So when I read how you pricks want to repeal the ACA I get so GD mad I want to beat the s**t out of you. Because your trying to k**l my son.


You're right.

The loudest ones are upset because their premium and deductible went up but they don't have a clue what its all about for folks like your son.

But no worries. After awhile, the facts start to show the positive of the ACA when comparing expansion states versus non-expansion states. All the focus has been on the problems in the non-expansion states but everyone knew the outcome when those states didn't expand anyhow. So it really isn't hurting the ACA, it just hurts those in need in those non-expansion states.
Go to
Oct 6, 2016 03:39:01   #
That's fine, go ahead and make and state your case but I believe I am simply reflecting the common observations on these things. No matter how many arguments you make, folks just don't see the dots connected that way about the Clintons. What would be their motivation? Why would that benefit them? See, the big picture has to fit but it doesn't.

However, the Trump thingy does fit the bigger picture. There can be lines of folks supporting the whole argument for the system that saved a failed Trump but folks know there is nothing in the system to save them if they have a bad year with a job loss or big medical bills or tuition or costs for elderly parents or relatives. If regular folks fail, they are on the street after bill collectors carrying court orders in hand come and take what ever possessions remain.

It is easy as making pie to make $10 billion if you can get billions in loans from the Chinese and Russians and if you're wrong and lose a billion, it's a tax write-off but you don't lose your mansion or billionaire lifestyle. People now see Trump is a con man and is far from being a successful genius.

It's a nice system but don't pretend that somehow Trump did it rather, the government made him a success - - he couldn't lose. The same system needs to be in place for ordinary people too especially those with medical debt or job loss debt - - give them the chance to become productive, tax paying citizens again.

CounterRevolutionary wrote:
Uncle Jesse writes:Because it is not credible, Clintons believe in consuming alcohol, eating pork bbq and pork hot dogs, educating females, allowing anyone to practice any religion they choose and secularism that enforces the prohibition of religious influence of the government. Conversely, those organizations like Taliban, Al Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood are seeking a government run by religion that prohibits alcohol, pork, allowing girls in school and placement of religious leaders in charge of laws.

Apparently, you did not read the articles above that I posted. Bill and Hillary Clinton have been promoting and subsidizing the Taliban, al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood since the 1990s. Follow the money. Follow who is running in and out of the State Department! Follow the multimillion dollar contributions of the Arab Emeritus, the Saudis, the Pakistani and Pashtun Taliban, and the Iranians to the Clinton Foundation.

Come on, Jesse! Heads up! Houston, we have a problem. Snakes, snakes, snakes, I see snakes everywhere!
Uncle Jesse writes:Because it is not credible, Cli... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 3, 2016 21:32:46   #
Because it is not credible, Clintons believe in consuming alcohol, eating pork bbq and pork hot dogs, educating females, allowing anyone to practice any religion they choose and secularism that enforces the prohibition of religious influence of the government. Conversely, those organizations like Taliban, Al Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood are seeking a government run by religion that prohibits alcohol, pork, allowing girls in school and placement of religious leaders in charge of laws.

However, the latest alleged Trump tax form (that hasn't been denied), shows that if true, that he lied about being a successful businessman. The t***h is he was a failure but the tax laws are written by the elite to protect the elite like Trump. As president there will be no IRS rules to bail him out of bankrupting the country.
Go to
Sep 30, 2016 21:52:20   #
Singularity wrote:
!


http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/09/when_facts_history_and_logic_d.html

His great weakness is his vanity. He is temperamentally incapable of allowing any attack on his person to go unavenged. He is particularly sensitive on the subject of his wealth. So central to his self-image is his business acumen that in the debate he couldn't resist the temptation to tout his cleverness on taxes. To an audience of 86 million, he appeared to concede that he didn't pay any. "That makes me smart," he smugly interjected.

Big mistake.
Go to
Sep 17, 2016 22:05:37   #
Keep it going. It's a great place to identify and monitor sociopaths and extremists. Besides, people can vent their energy in texts rather than have it bottled up and then explode on family, friends or neighbors.

Glaucon wrote:
OPP has gone rapidly down hill and has become a verbal and philosophical cesspool.

I would be interested in participants opinions on some issues:

What are YOUR motivations for participating? What of YOUR needs does it satisfy?

What do you think the purpose of OPP should be?

Do you believe the opinions and views expressed on OPP are about the same as most Americans?

Do you believe the participants are pathological and extreme in either direction? Which?

What do you think is causing OPP to become a cesspool?
OPP has gone rapidly down hill and has become a ve... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 12, 2016 22:44:40   #
Docadhoc wrote:
Do you live in a closet? Hillary had private and state business emails mixed on both her computer's and 13 mobile devices. She used a BlackBerry extensively even after being informed it is the mobile most easily hacked and she perjured herself more than once to Congress. She also lied about handing everything over and was found to have hidden 14,900 emails which now have been accessed.

And no foreign anyone hacked. It was our own NSA.

Before you comment further, learn what you are talking about. You are embarrassing yourself as well as all liberals.
Do you live in a closet? Hillary had private and ... (show quote)


That's interesting so, what's your belief as why she is cleared and free? If all you wrote is true, then there's an outcome. But based on reality, I'd say you may be mistaken. That's why we get the rolling of the eyes and folks normally open to conservatism get turned off, when they read or hear folks like you.
Go to
Sep 12, 2016 22:40:14   #
EconomistDon wrote:
Bulls**t!!!! You don't know that and they don't know that. Even if they did know that, they wouldn't admit it to "protect" Hillary. Wake up man, America's security is at stake. We are not just "playing" politics; AMERICA'S SECURITY IS AT STAKE. Get it?

The annoying fact is that an under cover agent in Iran was put to death because the Iranians discovered his connection to Hillary. How many more agents are running for their lives because of Hillary's stupidity? When will you fools stop covering for this corrupt i***t?
Bulls**t!!!! You don't know that and they don't k... (show quote)


I doubt that at all especially all the dramatics in your text indicate you are hyper and one of the types that believes Bush went to war to get our boys k**led on purpose. I think we can rely on security being secure despite what Powell and Clinton did or didn't do.
Go to
Sep 11, 2016 14:32:56   #
EconomistDon wrote:
You are overlooking a pretty important difference. The rest of the people on the email chain were not using an unsecured private server. Only Hillary was exposing classified information to foreign hackers. Who do you suppose would be the top two targets of foreign hackers? Obama -- number one. Hillary -- number two. She represented the prime communication link between our government and foreign nations, because she was the Secretary of State. She exposed the names of under cover agents to foreign hackers. Iran executed nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri when they discovered that he was an under cover agent. How do you suppose that they found out he was an undercover agent? Maybe hacked Hillary emails???? How many more agents are running for their lives because of Hillary's stupidity?

The other people on email chains didn't expose classified information to foreign hackers. Only Hillary did that.
You are overlooking a pretty important difference.... (show quote)


The foreign hackers got into the government servers many times but have never got into her private server. Evidence from November '14 to March '15 shows the "secured" state department and "secured" white house servers were hacked multiple times but no evidence has been found that her private server was hacked (basically, private security is far better than government security).
Go to
Sep 10, 2016 21:36:14   #
eagleye13 wrote:
It seems liberals do not have a very good grasp of what atheist C*******m delivers. The masses fell for the Bolshevik BS. The Chinese never knew what hit them. And still; Americans are supporting Hitlery. Ignorance, stupidity, and corruption does prevail sometimes. Not in the end though.

The ruthlessness is beyond most peoples comprehension, largely due to lack if studying it. It sure isn't taught in the government school system. Over 200 Million people starved and slaughtered by those regimes.
It is important to differentiate the different brands of "Jew". The term "Jew" is misused a lot, fraudulently, and confusingly.

Behind C*******m
Behind C*******m : Frank L Britton : Free Download & Streaming ...
http://archive.org/details/BehindC*******m
It seems liberals do not have a very good grasp of... (show quote)


So true, yes I agree but I do see a difference from then and now. The insight that I wanted to share is how each cycle through the libs or the left, it is less drastic. Perhaps from books and history lessons such as the one you referenced. To me, it sure seems like the Chinese, Vietnamese and especially the Russians have cycled through and embrace less of it - - at least from the economic monetary system. Cuba seems the last to have taken action but that too seems to have the potential to change with the talk of allowing private ownership and profit from foreign investors.

At the same time you have this resurgence of the left here (Bernie Sanders aka socialist democrats or democratic socialists or wh**ever they said they are). I get the impression there are a lot of our future generations are steered against the republic and believe the hype of western Europe socialism of 75% tax rate in exchange for a house that looks the same as every house in town and an education but not allowed to turn that education into a multimillion dollar corporation but even if there was a way to do that...the corporation would be taxed at 90% to completely shut down any growth opportunity in order to subsidize the expensive solar energy because nuclear and coal power plants are outlawed. And we could go on and on with the inherent weakness of the western European socialist system but the kids are being fed only one side of the story and just believe it is what they want.
Go to
Sep 10, 2016 21:21:02   #
BigMike wrote:
And you trust the global elitists?


Them thar global elitists been around since the early 1300's. Their type goes back a few millennia when it was regional elitism instead of global. Before that, it was tribal elitism. They'll be with us when it is galactic elitism too. As much as you think they are controlling us, they are equally dependent on us. Without us, they could not consider themselves either elite or in control. The republic will do fine despite them.
Go to
Sep 10, 2016 21:14:54   #
BigMike wrote:
Hogwash! She destroyed evidence that had been subpoenaed by Congress. She lied repeatedly to everyone about everything. They won't prosecute her because they're afraid of other things that might come out. Period. This isn't about Trump. It's about retaking the Republic before it's gone forever.


The emails she got from work and those she sent to work are all on the work computers. What they're upset about is the stuff she deleted bc it probably had the good stuff such as what she really thought of BHO. And bc she pulled a Clinton and was able to legally delete that kind of stuff, the only thing the GOP can do now is make up stuff such as "she lied". Now, if she lied, they would not hesitate to indict her...but they can't, bc she didn't lie. And the stuff about needing to retake the republic was said in vain back in '12 and the republic is still here..despite bho
Go to
Sep 10, 2016 17:40:13   #
padremike wrote:
I guess we're to understand that the Republic that will unquestionably be destroyed by Hillary is more acceptable to you? And obviously you haven't been observing Obama and his mob of Marxist progressives, including Hillary, destroying things and conveniently blaming the Conservatives? Maybe you'd be satisfied for a third term for Obama? Maybe you just don't know what's going on all around the entire world thanks to the complete failure of the Obama mob?


It never did bother me with the libs and the social stuff, drone wars and wh**ever else is supposedly destroying America. To me, any stuff they've done is piddly work compared to the actual near destruction from the wars and the subprime mortgage. Compared to those who call for the abolishment of government and forcefully taking public property, the marxist progressives are turning out to be far more patriotic too. The whole thing is upside down nowadays from what it used to be. What used to be called Marxist and C*******t used to actually mean Marxism and C*******m but nowadays its all twisted up that anyone who is for a Federal Bureau of Investigation or a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is being called a Marxist and C*******t.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 213 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.