One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rebelwidacoz
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 45 next>>
Nov 18, 2022 18:32:38   #
EmilyD wrote:
Yes, and thank you. I don't know why I bother...probably because it's a cold, snowy afternoon and there's not much else to do....


In the words of one of my ex's CALLING ME CRETAN!!!!
Go to
Nov 18, 2022 18:22:40   #
EmilyD wrote:
Teachers may have taught you back in the day not to use conjunctions at the start of sentences because students did so excessively or incorrectly. Instead of teaching them to limit conjunctions at the start of sentences, students were told not to do it. The reality is that starting a sentence with a conjunction is all a matter of style and tone, so that old rule changed long ago, and they are now teaching that it is grammatically correct.

Here's an example of the difference in the "tone" of a comment when a conjunction is at the beginning of a sentence:

You apologized for lying to me, but it was too late. I had moved on.

You apologized for lying to me. But it was too late, I had moved on.
Teachers may have taught you back in the day not t... (show quote)


I make the statement that 1+ 1= 2 and you reciprocate with something like " no, not really .....blah ze' blah ze' blah ze' .This is why I said in an earlier post, I neither had the time or an inclination to explain this rule of grammar to you because your response will always be that of what you did above.You do this because you have a personality flaw that is unique only to "You People ",that is to say people like you.
As for me lying to you; I have no Idea what
you're talking about. (note,I'm used the contraction of - YOU ARE -un like so many of "You People"do] as oppose to inadvertenly using the possessive pronoun - YOUR-
This has a whole different meaning than [you are ]....since you want to criticize people's grammar.
Go to
Nov 18, 2022 16:12:54   #
EmilyD wrote:
WRONG. It's absolutely okay to start a sentence with a conjunction. BUT, you probably should not try it because you wouldn't know the grammatically correct way to use it....


That's why "You People" are sickness and sickening too.
The extent of your argumentative debates
goes something like this due to your massive psychological insecurities.
I make a statement as such- 1+ 1 equal 2.You counter,....well,not really because ,blah ze ' blah ze' blah ze'......You just did as I have described- and that is " of course you can start a sentence with a coordinating conjunction,and prepositions "etc,etc,etc,
I will go back to my elementary school days to explain to you why....
Knowing the definition of a declarative sentence,and that is one that expresses complete thought,now when you start a sentence with the coordinating conjunction such as- and- it being a coordinator implies that ,that is a continuation or the connector of the prefixing thought,therefore starting a sentence with and means thought you want to convey has not been conveyed unless you go back to the preceding scripture paragraph or sentence
( writings not Bible,fool)especially if that is the opening paragraph, or opening of what ever literary item you are reading. If you don't believe me consult any Russian,or N Korean, or Iranian or Chinese linguistics expert....but don't hand me the " no,not really....." BS'
.P.S.you can ease your psychological insecurities by knowing that I was taught that by other white people like you.
Go to
Nov 17, 2022 20:17:54   #
American Vet wrote:
I criticize your grammar because you are barely able to construct a readable paragraph.

Perhaps pharmaceuticals are involved - seems like it.

But, as I have stated many times before, you can tell when a weak-minded extremist has been b-slapped - They accuse the other person of being a r****t or a N**i.


Alright,you are not a r****t BUT !!! STUPID AS HELL ! b-b- by the way , you do not start a sentence with the word BUT- and I do not have the time or the inclination to explain why.
Go to
Nov 17, 2022 19:42:04   #
American Vet wrote:
Bottom line: I have read a lot about 'c*******m' and 'socialism'.

May I suggest you educate yourself in proper English - especially grammar - and learn to construct a coherent sentence/paragraph. Your ability to effectively communicate needs much improvement.


May I suggest that you cease with the b***hy un becoming tactic of criticising people's grammar- you are not qualified to do so ( you are a damned CONFEDERATES) and when it comes to the english language- SHUT UP !-not only is your grammar not of the garden variety ,but more importantly, the fundamentals of your debates are stupid as hell because they are laced with your caucasoid ,active shooter emotions as opposed to cerebral objectivity - this leads to just plain ole chaoticness ,there are either one or two reasons for this.- either you are stupid as hell ,or you are a damned R****T! - and ah caint' stan' dem!
Go to
Nov 17, 2022 19:08:37   #
manning5 wrote:
============================

I suggest that serious socialist and c*******t [pseudo-Marxist or pseudo-Leninist] governments become full owners of as much of the property, industry, service facilities, and all other means of production and wealth as they can possibly manage [and not well-managed at that]. Citizens become vassals of the state, and control of the state is reserved for single-party elites. The military supports the state not the people.

Internal order in these situations has to be bolstered by a secret service, local party members with power of arrest, and the usual snitch-on-your-neighbor demand, death to real opposition or banishment to concentration camps. Death's mount into the multi-millions. Religions are stifled and banned, if possible, in favor of the atheism inherent in these forms of governance.

As vassals of the state citizens other than the elites are typically reduced to near poverty, and the middle and upper-middle classes are depressed or k**led. Ultimately, the elites realize that a bit of well-monitored free market organization is needed for the nation to survive economically. Some power then tends to shift a little towards the oligarchs that run industry, services, and agriculture, with some real success.

As always, however, absolute power continues to be vested in the party apparatus and the anointed leader. As time progresses, the system tends towards totalitarianism, or breaks down under the many intractable problems they have created for themselves, or...

Until the next c**p.

Anyone that wants these forms of government are literally out of their minds! The lesson of history is that Utopia is not a viable objective for large societies. Human nature in the people thwarts the process, often to return to the religious leanings of their past, and their latent desires for freedom and liberty.
============================ br br I suggest that... (show quote)


I suggest that the people are not as vassled as totalitarian countries enemies
want people to think they are.I suggest that a country that has a population of 1
.4 billion people being so malcontented and oppressed as you say they are, could easily Marshall their anger and over throw a government that has a military of no more than 2,000,000 odd personell,a country thats military is designed to repell out side threats ,cannot necessarily discourage internal threats that are of significant proportions. There is a phrase that goes something like this -keep majority of the people happy all of the time,and the rest of the people at least happy half the time
Do this and this is the formula for keeping totalitarian regimes viable.The contentions of totalitarian regimes committing atrocities like murdering their citizens in the millions is not true.If that's the case the world would know of it.
Just like Hitler couldn't hide the holocaust ,so could they not hide atrocities of such hololistic proportions .To support my theories on the matter,if these authoritarian governments were so draconian domineering, they wouldn't have to do as much lying and deception about disciplining those few of their citizens that decent from time to time- and just like c**ps didn’t work in the United States, neither will they work in countries like China and Russia.
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 23:13:27   #
American Vet wrote:
Lots of blather there.

Bottom line: I support freedom.

No country that has espoused 'socialism' or 'c*******m' affords it's people the freedoms we enjoy in America. One of the primary freedoms is freedom from a large, overbearing government.

That being said, there are many who are currently trying to limit that freedom.


The fact remains that Marxist leninist are still not so much n**i/ f*****ts controlling doctrines so much as advocates of controlling types of economics that is the opposite of the free market system of Capitalism.Bottom line you need to go back and read up on what c*******m and socialism are.The freedom denied is only the freedom of your ability to own the goods and services that you have the potential to produce and have produced .,the government controls it ,and distribute according to your need,not according to your wants.On the other hand there are authoritarian governments that are restrictive of your total freedom, things like not letting you have freedom of speech and restrict your very movements of travel.Why do you think there are people whom in order to be free they have to defect
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 22:58:38   #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/facebook-fact-checking-donald-trump/2022/11/16/id/1096637/


Don't care if he lies or not -huh ?
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 17:22:23   #
American Vet wrote:
Perhaps you had better take a history class.

MLK had ties to the C*******t party; and history has shown McCarthy was right.

Martin Luther King, Jr. was closely aligned to the C*******t philosophy if not the C*******t Party. King’s very friendly biographer, David J. Garrow admitted, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” In his book (Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (1986)), he quotes King as saying to his Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) staff:
“We have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution… The whole structure of American life must be changed… We are engaged in the class struggle.” — Martin Luther King, Jr.

https://www.thestandardsc.org/don-boys/was-mlk-a-c*******t/

Journalist and author M. Stanton Evans argues in his new book, "Blacklisted By History," that declassified files from the United States and the Soviet Union prove that Sen. Joe McCarthy was right about the c*******t threat and that liberals have ignored the evidence and distorted history.
https://cnsnews.com/news/article/documents-show-joe-mccarthy-was-right-author-says
Perhaps you had better take a history class. br b... (show quote)


The tactic of the agitate,agitate, agitate,peaceful nonviolent civil rights movement was taught to King by Ghandi,in other words King studied under Ghandi- anyhoooww how do you equate an economic theory, which is what c*******m is,with a social movement designed not to administrator and regulate the distribution of the monies of a society with a movement design to eliminate social ine******y that have oppressive and suppressive, and sometimes F*****ts philosophies-even the staunchest of c*******tic countries ( like the USSR) versed that type of .....authoritarian controls.It was Russia that stopped N**i Germany. I think you keep thinking of c*******m as a political doctrine of extreme authoritarianism because you keep villifying such people as proponents of it.When it is merely a doctrine of economics .P.S.- Boy !! "You People " you're brilliant.
Also when you say King spoke of classism ,you misinterpreted that as being of a c*******tic nature.,he didn't say anything of a nature of redistributing the wealth, but was more or less thinking of the social ine******y that the class system prevailed or was - that being the in justice of b****s being disenfranchised or not being given a fair shake ,such as being restricted from facets of the academic world,and in the real estate word (not allowed to purchase homes in certain areas)What did you think Affirmative Action was about,and such things like quotas that had to met.
So it is another case of your type being semantical and distorting as usual to suit your manical sick twisted interests in trying to maintain your privileged status qou mantle. How Trumpian ,thinking you could tell anyone anything.Excuse me you were committing such atrocities before any one knew of Trump.
Now if you want to label people C*******t there were black and white revolutionary type that were professed C*******t that were involved in the civil rights and the so called revolution movements.One that comes to mind was Angela Davis. The reason she was of the Marxists doctrinares is because she thought the sytem was unfair and r****ts
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 04:01:32   #
proud republican wrote:
You know, it's time to show that we ARE United States of America.... Both sides should cast extreme fringe of a Party aside and do the job that American people elected you to do... I know some of you may disagree, but I think Republicans and Democrats CAN and SHOULD work together. What do you guys think?? Personally, I'm tired of attacks on each other... It's not helping to make our country the GREATEST ..But that's just my opinion....


The Democrats can
The Republicans cannot and will not -because of the vestiges of Reaganisim still exist.He advised the Republicans to stand by theirs guns no matter what,and be non- negotiationable in their pursuits to have things their way or no way all.
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 03:54:44   #
David L wrote:
President Trump speaks for over an hour at each of his rallies. I simply asked for the Libs to point out one sentence, or even one word that is a lie or better yet, a threat to Democracy. To coin a phrase, "The silence was deafening."

One lib answered by posting a link from a ridiculous propaganda arm of the Socialist party. They list the "lies" that Trump supposedly told. One example of their version of a lie is that Trump calls g****l w*****g a h**x. That is an opinion, not a lie. In fact the evidence is on Trumps side because the G****l w*****g crowd has been wrong on every prediction for the last fifty years. So who is the real liar?

I ask the same question in person on the rare occasion that I talk to a never Trumper in person. (they are quite rare in this part of the world) I ask them to tell me one lie that Trump has told. The answer is ALWAYS, "Well, he lies all the time." My response is that it should be easy then to give me just one example. They fail every time, just as they failed to answer my challenge on this site.
President Trump speaks for over an hour at each of... (show quote)


G****l w*****g is a fact ,not an opinion, When Trump claims it doesn't exist it is not a matter of him not knowing any better,it is a matter of him maliciously lying or him being exceedingly stupid.One can determine that global warming exist just by observing the difference of weather patterns on his own.Then there is the scientific evidence of it being broadcast all within the weather reports by the media ,drying up seas and rivers ,dry ground never before seen at the poles as oppose to snow and glaciers.I can't believe anyone is still around claiming it doesn't exist.
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 03:39:35   #
proud republican wrote:
As it stands right now Republicans still have 217 Representatives, and to get into majority we just need 1 more v**e..However Dems have 209 Representatives.. I'm afraid that Dems are slow walking results so Republicans will have the minimal Representatives as possible..... I have never seen such BS during Midterms or any other e******ns.. E******n only supposed to last 1 day, 2 at the most!...NOT weeks...... For example Florida took only few hrs to get results... Why can't every damn state follow Florida's example!!.. 🙄🙄🙄
As it stands right now Republicans still have 217... (show quote)


It is two things holding up the count.The residual of the p******c ,rather than go to the polls and v**e in person, people would not take the risk of being mixed in with a crowd there by minimizing the chances of getting the v***s,hence causing them to use mail in b****ts.This brings about added efforts to validate the person properly being authorized to cast a b****t ,they are doing this by verifying signatures with pre obtained signature retrieved ,probably from their original registration process. - and Trump claiming he was frauded .This causes them to be extra diligent in the counting of the b****ts so as to not be accused of fraud and e******n chicanery,and this - darling- can only be attributed to the Republicans.
Go to
Nov 16, 2022 03:18:10   #
currahee506 wrote:
If Democrats become Americans and repent of being Marxist then we can work together.


Who told you that the democrats were Marxists ? let me guess , the Republicans, right.I don't know how old you are , but any time anyone doesn't concur with their beliefs and ideals they label them c*******t .They were calling King c*******t back in the day [ the sixties specifically]and anyone that spoke contrary to their beliefs such as hippies,,all b****s ,women's liber"s,and just plain ole any body of the garden variety liberal mind set- like McCarthy did in the 50's ,every body and their brother was a commy.To refer to everyone as a c*******t was known as Mccarthyism
Go to
Nov 14, 2022 23:32:45   #
proud republican wrote:
You know, it's time to show that we ARE United States of America.... Both sides should cast extreme fringe of a Party aside and do the job that American people elected you to do... I know some of you may disagree, but I think Republicans and Democrats CAN and SHOULD work together. What do you guys think?? Personally, I'm tired of attacks on each other... It's not helping to make our country the GREATEST ..But that's just my opinion....


The Democrats can work with the Wigs,and anybody.The Republicans are (like confederate money,none negotiable)
Go to
Nov 13, 2022 18:48:02   #
eagleye13 wrote:
"Us lefters gave that term up millineums ago.We use " - rebelwidaco

Your a Lefter?

Your causes are what?


What do you mean by "YOUR a LEFTER" ,as in the possessive case of pronoun that connotes ownership- or did you mean the contraction of YOU ARE ,which goes like this - YOU'RE.This is what produces my causes ,causes of getting people like you to shut up due to reasons alluded to above.To answer your question of my being a lefter,NO! socially and
fiscally speaking ,I'm a moderate,Ideally, everyone should be- one should temper themselves in every aspect of the situations both fiscally and spiritually.The reason why you might view me as a leftwinger,free spending liberal, lenient type of person is because there are people like you that begrudge people like me existence it self,hence,you force me to expand those characteristics of liberalism for survival purposes alone.You do this by disregarding mortal established fringes I am entitled to as an equal authorized entity to be here just as you are.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 45 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.