I was not talking to you. Please return the favor. Oh- do I assume you meant to throw your weight behind the N**i to whom I WAS speaking?
Actually, you always knew he was no such thing.
Once more time: right-wing nut-jobs are aint conservative! Hitler wasn't conservative or, a bit more extreme, tRumpf is not conservative. Repeat it a few times, maybe it will sink in.
Does this venue really provide a platform for h**eful N**is?
It might be bad English, but English it be. As for your faux French, maybe you meant s'il vouz plait?
The German term is "panzerfaust", FYI.
Not just Texans suing same- anybody from anywhere can use Texas courts to sue anyone from anywhere as long as he can find a thread tying back to possibly helping any Texan (or someone from a neighboring state using Texas facilities) get an a******n past fetal heartbeat stage. This from republicans who always insist they're opposed to frivolous lawsuits.
I see racial (make that r****T) obsessions. When combined with photoshop, you see the reason why only an the extremes of exaggeration can say texas has a heart.
I didn't even know Ram Jam covered the song, nor did I know it was a cadence ditty for negro Confederate soldiers. Learn something new every day. But seriously- haven't ANY of you white boys (or brothers) seen "The Last Waltz"? The farewell concert by The Band, circa 1978? DVD commonly available, with Robbie Robertson, Levon Helm & Co. performing that very song- and a lot better to boot. Czech it out.
Michigan- If it involves the lions directly, it aint a joke. Try this: A man from the South (don't matter where) says, "Michigan, eh? We all know winter, what do you do for fun in the summer?" Michigander says, "If it falls on a weekend we have a cookout".
Not at all. Just as you were wondering if I was a troll (is that the same as a bot?), which I'm not, by the way, I wondered if you were a trumpster. The reason isn't ducking debate, it's whether it's a waste of time. Since you seem to be reasonable, sort of, you get the benefit. I'm not a l*****t- I just don't want to fall down a rabbit hole. If your mind isn't in the right-wing gutter, just say so. People with whom I disagree who don't want to k**l me make for a good exchange. Post & riposte, soda speak.
As I said, no fear of him. B*M and "A****a" aren't terrorist organizations by virtue of not being organizations at all. "Cancel culture" is a revisionist name for revisionism. Clearly, I didn't just get here. Removing statues- and building names- that deserve to be here is what I decried. As for which party championed James T. Crow, the Democratic party left that behind starting with the new deal, completing it in the LBJ years. So where did the r****ts end up? Three guesses, you won't need the first two. Am I going to hear you start crowing that trumpf won, that f*****ts are fine people, or are you one of those rare people who can see the clowns to the left of you and jokers to the right? Just curious.
Better- but who DID write it? Then as now, I think the Fathers were big enough to take it. They had no fear of George the Umpteenth of Hanover (Third of England), so likely none of Colbert. Point being, once dead, past caring is the general idea. Colbert's still funny. If you want a better target, try everyone who wants to make revisionism the only acceptable form seriously, as in taking down Washington, Jefferson, & Lewis Cass's names from buildings and more because they owned s***es. Those Civil War generals statues are different- they only went UP as a twentieth century revisionist attempt at "the south shall rise again" brand w***e s*******y.
I didn't see the "slander" you headlined. In legal terms, you can't slander the dead. Choose another ignorant, insulting term, then go for it.