Hmm...Harvard verus Wasalla.....that's a difficult one to decide....if you're really smart, private entitities will endow a scholarship upon you. Mine was from the Moody Foundation in Galvestom, TX - 4 years wherever I wanted to go and wh**ever I wanted to study

**If she was so smart, why did she go to so many colleges for just a bachelors?

After graduating from high school in 1982, Palin enrolled at the University of Hawaii at Hilo.[24] Shortly after arriving in Hawaii, Palin t***sferred to Hawaii Pacific University in Honolulu for a semester in the fall of 1982, and then to North Idaho College, a community college in Coeur d'Alene, for the spring and fall semesters of 1983.[25] She enrolled at the University of Idaho in Moscow for an academic year, starting in August 1984, then attended Matanuska-Susitna College in Alaska in the fall of 1985. Palin returned to the University of Idaho in January 1986, and received her bachelor's degree in communications with an emphasis in journalism in May 1987

Hmm...Harvard verus Wasalla.....that's a difficult one to decide....if you're really smart, private entitities will endow a scholarship upon you. Mine was from the Moody Foundation in Galvestom, TX - 4 years wherever I wanted to go and wh**ever I wanted to study

**If she was so smart, why did she go to so many colleges for just a bachelors?

After graduating from high school in 1982, Palin enrolled at the University of Hawaii at Hilo.[24] Shortly after arriving in Hawaii, Palin t***sferred to Hawaii Pacific University in Honolulu for a semester in the fall of 1982, and then to North Idaho College, a community college in Coeur d'Alene, for the spring and fall semesters of 1983.[25] She enrolled at the University of Idaho in Moscow for an academic year, starting in August 1984, then attended Matanuska-Susitna College in Alaska in the fall of 1985. Palin returned to the University of Idaho in January 1986, and received her bachelor's degree in communications with an emphasis in journalism in May 1987

From: "Furious Cool" by David Henry

Huey Newton and Bobby Seale formed the Black Panthers in 1966, partially in response to perceived police brutality. At the inception, the Black Panthers were as much about community service as political protest, and ran a free breakfast program serving thousands of Oakland's disadvantaged children. The Panthers expanded rapidly to sixty eight cities and thousands of members, and achieved success in obtaining a number of concessions from local governments. However, the Panthers devolved in the 1970s due to infighting and reports of criminal activity such as drug dealing and extortion:

Huey Newton graduated from Berkeley High a functional illiterate but then doggedly taught himself to read by struggling through Plato's Republic, plowing all the way through it no fewer than five times until he understood it. The book, and his accomplishment in learning to read it, fueled his aspirations to become a political leader.

Original six members of the Black Panther Party (1966)
"By the time he and Bobby Seale formed the Black Panther Party in October of 1966, Huey Newton had completed two years of law school and was well known on campus for his spirited discussions on the finer points of constitutional law. Bobby Seale was an engineering design major who had spent three years in the air force doing structural repair on high-performance aircraft and had worked on the Gemini missile program. Yet the press and political forces portrayed the Panthers as armed hoodlums and drug thugs who roamed the streets looking to gun down white people. J. Edgar Hoover's counterintelligence unit regarded even the Panthers' free breakfast program a threat to national security. The free breakfast program, which by 1969 served more than ten thousand Oakland children every morning before they went to school, was but one of the party's 'survival programs', along with clothing and food giveaways, escort services for the elderly, and health care services that included testing for sickle-cell anemia.

"Still, the only thing that mattered to the media and to a majority of Americans -- the only thing they knew about the Panthers, apparently -- was that they had guns. At that time, white America could scarcely imagine anything scarier than 'armed Negroes.'

Panther Jerry Dunigan, known as "Odinka", serves breakfast to children at Panther Free Breakfast Program
"The scariest thing they couldn't have imagined would be Negroes with unconcealed weapons operating out in the open and entirely within the law -- angry young militants brazenly availing themselves of their legal and constitutional rights the same as everyone else. 'They were registered guns,' Newton pointed out. 'Just like the NRA's guns. Just like Charlton Heston's guns.'

"This wasn't what the Establishment had in mind when they advised minorities to work for change within the system. They meant casting b****ts -- with proper ID and no outstanding warrants -- every couple of years for either candidate R or candidate D. That didn't mean exercise your rights to peaceably assemble, to engage in free speech, or bear arms and, when challenged, demand the courts to either uphold those rights or announce to the whole world, point-blank, that those rights didn't apply to people like you. But that's what they did. ...

"Exercising their constitutional right to bear arms was but one weapon in the Panthers' arsenal. Along with their guns, they carried tape recorders, cameras, and law books as they patrolled the streets on their mission to 'police the police,' to observe and document law enforcement's volatile interactions with Oakland's black citizenry. ...

"Huey, Bobby, Stokely, Hubert, Eldridge, Sherwin -- who would've guessed that such bookish, even nerdy-sounding names could strike apprehension and fear in the hearts of white America more than midway through what was supposed to be its greatest century?

"Congress went so far as to pass a law against the party's minister of justice Hubert 'H. Rap' Brown -- the 'Rap Brown' Federal Anti-R**t Act, tacked onto a fair housing law at the last minute by Senator Strom Thurmond, making it illegal to travel from one state to another, write a letter, make a telephone call, or speak on radio or television with the intent of encouraging any person to participate in a r**t."

**That's okay...you do not believe as much about President Obama...and he is smarter than a whole party of old southern white guys...who tried to repeal the ACA 50+ times...so I understand that you would never believe that....when I received my hood (cape), my professor said during the presentation that in some circles it has been stated that I had genius capacity.....I have it on DVD...and just think I went from that to being called dumb by you yokel hillbillies..........so it is never expected for YOU PEOPLE....to acknowledge as much....but that's kool...what my academic peers and professors think matter...not you bottom-barrel hee haw types**

Racial Bias, Even When We Have Good Intentions
JAN. 3, 2015
By SENDHIL MULLAINATHAN
The deaths of African-Americans at the hands of the police in Ferguson, Mo., in Cleveland and on Staten Island have reignited a debate about race. Some argue that these events are isolated and that r****m is a thing of the past. Others contend that they are merely the tip of the iceberg, highlighting that skin color still has a huge effect on how people are treated.
Arguments about race are often heated and anecdotal. As a social scientist, I naturally turn to empirical research for answers. As it turns out, an impressive body of research spanning decades addresses just these issues — and leads to some uncomfortable conclusions and makes us look at this debate from a different angle.
The central challenge of such research is isolating the effect of race from other factors. For example, we know African-Americans earn less income, on average, than w****s. Maybe that is evidence that employers discriminate against them. But maybe not. We also know African-Americans tend to be stuck in neighborhoods with worse schools, and perhaps that — and not race directly — explains the wage gap. If so, perhaps policy should focus on place rather than race, as some argue.
But we can isolate the effect of race to some degree. A study I conducted in 2003 with Marianne Bertrand, an economist at the University of Chicago, illustrates how. We mailed thousands of résumés to employers with job openings and measured which ones were selected for callbacks for interviews. But before sending them, we randomly used stereotypically African-American names (such as “Jamal”) on some and stereotypically white names (like “Brendan”) on others.
The same résumé was roughly 50 percent more likely to result in callback for an interview if it had a “white” name. Because the résumés were statistically identical, any differences in outcomes could be attributed only to the factor we manipulated: the names.
Other studies have also examined race and employment. In a 2009 study, Devah Pager, Bruce Western and Bart Bonikowski, all now sociologists at Harvard, sent actual people to apply for low-wage jobs. They were given identical résumés and similar interview training. Their sobering finding was that African-American applicants with no criminal record were offered jobs at a rate as low as white applicants who had criminal records.
These kinds of methods have been used in a variety of research, especially in the last 20 years. Here are just some of the general findings:
■ When doctors were shown patient histories and asked to make judgments about heart disease, they were much less likely to recommend cardiac catheterization (a helpful procedure) to black patients — even when their medical files were statistically identical to those of white patients.
■ When w****s and b****s were sent to bargain for a used car, b****s were offered initial prices roughly $700 higher, and they received far smaller concessions.
■ Several studies found that sending emails with stereotypically black names in response to apartment-rental ads on Craigslist elicited fewer responses than sending ones with white names. A regularly repeated study by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development sent African-Americans and w****s to look at apartments and found that African-Americans were shown fewer apartments to rent and houses for sale.
■ White state legislators were found to be less likely to respond to constituents with African-American names. This was true of legislators in both political parties.
■ Emails sent to faculty members at universities, asking to talk about research opportunities, were more likely to get a reply if a stereotypically white name was used.
■ Even eBay auctions were not immune. When iPods were auctioned on eBay, researchers randomly varied the skin color on the hand holding the iPod. A white hand holding the iPod received 21 percent more offers than a black hand.
The criminal justice system — the focus of current debates — is harder to examine this way. One study, though, found a clever method. The pools of people from which jurors are chosen are effectively random. Analyzing this natural experiment revealed that an all-white jury was 16 percentage points more likely to convict a black defendant than a white one, but when a jury had one black member, it convicted both at the same rate.
I could go on, but hopefully the sheer breadth of these findings impresses you, as it did me.
There are some counterexamples: Data show that some places, like elite colleges, most likely do favor minority applicants. But this evidence underlies that a helping hand in one area does not preclude harmful shoves in many other areas, including ignored résumés, unhelpful faculty members and reluctant landlords.

Angry limbah supporters/ditto heads/ mind numbed robots and the usual fools, freaks, h**ers, bashers and rightwingnut name callers are incensed at the way I choose to spell limbah, so to mix it up, maybe I will spell it limburg, limblah, or maybe just fat-ass.
These same morons have no problem with calling the president names, or any liberal/centrist who dares to disagree with their childish, moronic view of fat ass limbah.

A few facts.

There are many "manly, angry, tough guys who claim to be heroic veterans" who complain so loudly that their messiah fat ass limburg is being dis-respected.
How can they support limbah, the draft dodger, who claimed he had a boil on his fat ass that prevented him from being drafted and possibly having to serve in Viet Nam.
But limbah has done a great job of getting these keyboard warriors of h**e to lick the limbah lollipop.

And speaking of licking lollipops, when fat ass limbah was in Pittsburgh, in a tiny AM station in Mckeesport that t=did not even cover all of Pittsburgh, limblah, then known as jeff christie was a known frequenter of gay bars with his "good buddy" named woodruff. His gayness, in addition to be a lousy DJ got fat ass fired and he wound up out of radio for a number of years.
limburg has been married four times, but has been unable to produce a child, possible because of his gay life style and paying women to marry him with non-disclosure clauses to keep his secret from his legions of lollipop lickers

Now the usual assortment of angry lollipop lickers can keep on supporting a draft dodging, gay loud mouth who is a r****t, bigot, homphobe who wnat you to spek into his mic.

Remember, liberals/centrists do not waste much time listening to fat ass because liberals are younger, smarter, more active, and don;t have 3 hours a day to listen to pompous fat ass blow hard.