One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: nwtk2007
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 ... 3821 next>>
Dec 2, 2019 18:26:44   #
JFlorio wrote:
as where moldy is just simple.


Go to
Dec 2, 2019 18:26:09   #
permafrost wrote:
Are so dense you can not understand? It has been explained over and over..

the v****g rights are real and until the repeal gave states the chance to change them and stop v**ers they did not want to reach the polls, the law was effective..

From the point of repeal, some states strive to pass laws which in fact keep some v**er from having that right..

it is very obvious and well documented and most or at least some of the most repressive have been overturned. currently 35 states have id laws, some challenged some may be well written an legal.
Are so dense you can not understand? It has been ... (show quote)


So, allowing b****s and Hispanics to v**e without a photo ID would result in greater numbers of b****s and Hispanics v****g?? Why??
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 18:24:34   #
permafrost wrote:
I have responded to that question with data and the findings of the courts.. a number of times..

sure as hell no need to bother any more with any t***h, means not a thing to the right wing nut cases and is only a waste of OPP space..


So I guess you have posted data showing that minorities v**e at a lower percentage rate of their population than other races but I don't think you have posted anything that shows how v**er ID suppresses minority v**ers but not w****s. And if you actually think v**er ID discourages minorities from v****g, what is the reason why???
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 18:21:41   #
MR Mister wrote:
It has zero effect on anyone. But, here is the reason the left wants it. The dead can v**e, you can v**e 5 or 10 times or more! No one will know how many times you v**e. So, I watched a guy that hung curtains in Chicago win the oval office two times. It's a great system for the left.


LOL! True. I'm just wanting to hear something about it from their feeble minds. What lie would they make up to defend their view that v**er ID laws are discriminatory??
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 18:20:07   #
teabag09 wrote:
If you ask me it's an insult to minorities. Keep them on the Plantation. Mike


V**er ID's are an insult to minorities??
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 17:35:38   #
permafrost wrote:
strange, both your memory and you fact retention seem to have tanked on the same day..

I have said several times, if you want an investigation of Biden, go ahead. all you need is evidence or credible information... trump had none so he went to blackmail Ukraine. Try again..

Nunes seems to be in much deeper s*** then the Biden, I would say his political life is over, even if trump were in a position to pardon him if such became an option..

So by all means, let the investigation go on...

Your tarnished orange dweb will no doubt sit and soil the office for the final year of his term. but only a true disaster would see him reelected..
strange, both your memory and you fact retention s... (show quote)


Apparently is ample evidence of theft of gov funds because there has already been a criminal referral in Ukraine. Maybe you can find something about it but Google is effectively blocking most of it now.
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 17:27:41   #
permafrost wrote:
Who the dickens said anything about a preemptive strike??? That language is from the Bush days of republicanism..


You truly have some problems. if the rest of your right wing world has the same opinion about Russia, we are in a truly dangerous conundrum..

While I think China is fast replacing Russia as the eastern power and most to be feared, Putin is perhaps the most dangerous individual in any other nation. and he owns your orange albatross.

Did you read the post on China goals by 2050 that CD posted today or so?? should read it.
Who the dickens said anything about a preemptive s... (show quote)


What makes Putin so dangerous?
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 16:53:12   #
JFlorio wrote:
F****l f**ls will be considered bad by the lefties until not using them negatively effects their lifestyle.


Exactly.
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 16:37:56   #
It's been asked over and over again. How do v**er ID laws single out minorities??? How does it work??
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 16:36:02   #
moldyoldy wrote:
He was not saying he spent time with him, he spent time on understanding him, something trump never does.


He states he's spent a lot of time with these folks, Kim included. His speech is slurred. Did you notice?? You might be right, but Joe is gone, pure and simple.
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 16:20:29   #
son of witless wrote:
An amazing amount of hogwash. This must be a non story written to balance out the H****r B***n Hogtashtophy. And young Biden was quite a Hog in Ukraine.


Go to
Dec 2, 2019 16:18:28   #
Parky60 wrote:
Something the L*****ts on OPP Won’t Mention: US Has First Full Month as Net Oil Exporter for First Time in 70 Years
TOM OZIMEK ~ December 2, 2019
The United States has hit another milestone in the Trump administration’s quest for energy independence, becoming a net exporter of crude and petroleum products for a full month for the first time in 70 years, according to government data.

U.S. monthly oil exports surpassed imports by 89,000 barrels per day in September, making the country a net exporter on a monthly basis for the first time since the government started tracking relevant data in 1949, according to figures published by the Energy Information Administration (EIA).

The EIA data shows that U.S. oil exports in September rose 18 percent year-over-year to about 8.76 million barrels per day, while imports over the same period fell 12 percent to about 8.67 million barrels.

About a decade ago, the U.S. ran a negative oil trade balance of more than 13 million barrels per day.

The new figures confirm the trend forecast in the Short-Term Energy Outlook published by the EIA earlier this month.

“Based on preliminary data and model estimates, EIA estimates that the United States exported 140,000 b/d more total crude oil and petroleum products in September than it imported,” the agency said on Nov. 13.

“If confirmed in survey-collected monthly data, it would be the first time the United States exported more petroleum than it imported since EIA records began in 1949.”

Further, the EIA “expects total crude oil and petroleum net exports to average 750,000 b/d in 2020 compared with average net imports of 520,000 b/d in 2019.”

Last year, the United States became a net oil exporter for a given week for the first time in almost 75 years. In the final week of November 2018, weekly U.S. net imports of crude oil and petroleum products fell to minus 211,000 barrels per day, meaning the country became a net exporter of that amount, according to data from the EIA.

U.S. oil exports have expanded rapidly in recent years as a result of many factors, including increased domestic production of crude oil and hydrocarbon gas liquids.

In the past half-century, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), led by Saudi Arabia, had typically dictated oil markets. The rise of U.S. shale production, however, has changed that dynamic.

As the United States becomes a net energy exporter, it gains the ability to contribute one of the foundational needs for economic prosperity in developing countries—reliable energy, Jason Isaac, senior manager at Life: Powered, told The Epoch Times.

“Ten years ago, we had over 18 percent of the world in severe poverty. Today, 10 years later, do you want to know who wins the 10-year challenge? It’s humanity. Just over 8 percent of the world’s population is in severe poverty. And we’ve done that by getting people access to energy,” Isaac said.

He dismisses claims that increased f****l f**l production has led to greater environmental degradation in the United States.

“According to the EPA, that couldn’t be further from the t***h. It’s getting cleaner. The United States actually leads the world in clean air,” he said.

Isaac said providing reliable, affordable energy to developing countries is an opportunity to lift millions of out poverty and save lives.

“They burn fuels such as wood or animal dung to heat and cool their homes,” he said. “Almost a million people a year die around the world from lung illness caused by indoor air pollution because they don’t have access to energy. So they use what they do have available and so that’s trees, animal dung, and things like that to eat and cook their food. We should want those people to get access to our energy and our energy resources and our technology that helps reduce pollution.”

Daniel Turner, founder and executive director of Power the Future, an advocacy organization for U.S. energy workers, echoed Isaac’s views.

“What I think the left gets wrong is I think they don’t have faith in American entrepreneurialism and in American technology,” he told The Epoch Times. “There is no doubt we used to be a dirtier country. Coal has gotten cleaner. Oil and gas has gotten cleaner. They don’t have the faith that as time goes by, these technologies get better, they get smarter.”

Turner says critics of U.S. f****l f**l-based energy production dismiss its benefits and disregard the people who rely on those jobs for their livelihoods.

“Instead, they just denigrate them,” he said, and “make them sound like they’re bad guys, but what they’re doing is providing this economy that undergirds our entire civilization.”

“Things are cheap. Gas is cheap,” Turner said. “Iran is seizing cargo ships in the Straits of Hormuz and oil is at $52 a barrel. That’s extraordinary. It should be at $150. It was 10 years ago when we were in these conflicts. Why is it not? Because America is energy independent. And your groceries are getting cheaper, your cars are getting cheaper. Look at the quality of life we have.”

“Things are good, things are cheap, things are inexpensive. And instead of celebrating any of that, they just look at it as bad, wrong, evil, destroy—socialism.”
b Something the L*****ts on OPP Won’t Mention: US... (show quote)


The left will speak up when they figure out how to take credit for it, until then, it's all bad!
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 15:20:11   #
Louis wrote:
If b****s were actually v****g on which candidate is doing the best for them, then Trump should get 100% of the black v**e.


http://www.cc.com/video-clips/k315nl/the-daily-show-with-trevor-noah-who-will-win-the-black-v**e-in-2020-
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 15:18:46   #
Louis wrote:
If b****s were actually v****g on which candidate is doing the best for them, then Trump should get 100% of the black v**e.


I think they are beginning to see that!
Go to
Dec 2, 2019 15:12:28   #
And Trump's black v**ers have no issues with getting a photo ID.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/liz-peek-trump-black-v**ers
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 ... 3821 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.