plain logic wrote:
It's a balancing act. Do you shut down the entire countries economics to get quantitative data on infected? then reboot and find if the data shows what the spread is? all the while, serologist work long hard and fast to come up with something. Is the data being collected the best route?
There have been other p******cs before, data has been collected on past p******cs, what comparisons have they found? Has knee jerk reactions caused misstatements to be made to quell fear and panic? Has media helped to quell panic or exacerbated it? Has the proper information been give to the populace?
The Government doesn't want people to know, that they, themselves, don't know what the best route to take.. Now, people and media, and those with an agenda want to cause panic and chaos, that's fact those are just the t***hs.
The Government does what needs to be done to calm the fears and stop panic, but people are people and panic is always hiding, waiting for the opportunity to come out, media pumps it up for their agenda.
It's a balancing act. Do you shut down the entire ... (
show quote)
Panic was definitely a media driven agenda. They wanted that! Bad for Trump.
We have good numbers now and know what to do but no one, not even the experts, will now admit that they aver reacted and helps cause this idiocy we have before us.
As for past p******cs, a study of those only proves my case. H1N1 k**led children and young people preferentially. But since the media was behind the president of the times, there was no panic and even the "experts" didn't see the need t close the schools. 12,500 dead in the US alon the first year. And just an FYI, H1N1 had it's rise in the US, for the most part.