You have the brains of a freeze dried peanut.

Seriously, dude, do you actually believe that a nationwide gun confiscation is possible?

Tell you what, you come up with the plan, lay it all out, tell us how this would go down, leave nothing out.

And, I'll blow more holes in it than a screen door.

Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Ephesians 6: 11-12

Don't you know President Trump is responsible for that?

Maybe. As I understand it, the guards responsible are on administrative leave.

Information about conditions in federal prisons has been posted on several threads. The entire federal prison system is critically understaffed and living conditions are horrible--MCC Manhattan is no exception. The Bureau of Prisons is failing to recruit qualified people to replace COs that retire, resign, or quit.

COs are currently working many overtime hours to take up the slack. MCC Manhattan guards admitted to working as many as five overtime shifts in a row, logging as much as 80 hours a week.

In many cases, a prison admin will assign secretaries, maintenance personnel, and even cooks to take CO duties in prisoner surveillance--such as monitoring the CCTVs. COs are supposed to physically check on prisoners every 30 or 60 minutes, then they must sign a log indicating they did so. Often this log is fudged, a CO will simply sign the log without making the rounds, this is common particularly at night.

Dr. Barbara Sampson, NY ME, performed the autopsy on Epstein's body. Dr. Sampson has a rather impressive resume as a forensics pathologist. The famous pathologist Dr. Michael Baden observed Epstein’s autopsy on his lawyers’ behalf. Dr. Sampson ruled his death was suicide.

OK, now, suppose the ME had determined Epstein was murdered. The hunt is on. Looking for the perps in all the high places. And, who would carry the ball? Who would point the fingers? And, at whom?

We know beyond doubt that the progressive socialist movement runs the MSM, or the MSM runs the progressive socialist movement--an intimate symbiotic relationship exists with a hell of a lot of power to influence the masses--and at present this entity has one goal in mind--DESTROY PRESIDENT TRUMP.

Would this progressive monster implicate Bill Clinton in Epstein's death? Nope. Hillary? Nope.

Would it implicate anyone directly involved in Epstein's global sex trafficking operation? Nope. Wait a minute! Hold it. Checking-----Yep, there he is, big as life, Donald Trump.

"After New York financier Jeffrey Epstein was arrested for sex trafficking of minors, many big names have cropped up in the scandal but none bigger than that of Donald Trump, the President of the United States."

"Donald Trump and Jeffery Epstein tie up and brutally rape 13 year old girl at a party in Epstein's Manhattan residence."

"Donald Trump seems to have illegally brought girls as young as 14 to the U.S. to work uncompensated."

"22 women accuse Donald Trump of sexual abuse.

"Donald Trump had an affair with a porn star, Donald Trump's wife, Melania, is a porn star, Donald Trump was sweet on his young daughter Ivanka, Donald Trump is an adulterer, a rapist, and a p*******e. He's a N**i, a f*****t, a homophobe, xenophobe, r****t, anti-Semite, an abuser, an accuser, and a midnight loser."

"And the beat goes on."

If Epstein's death had been ruled a murder, who would get the blame?

BTW: Anyone who believes that death by h*****g (strangulation) only succeeds with a full weight vertical drop from a gallows pole is watching too many movies.

In other words you would like to see an inalienable right infringed.

Registration and liability insurance applies to such things a vehicle, owning and driving a vehicle is a privilege granted by the state, it is not a constitutional right.

Every gun owner I have ever known knows how to "safely operate, carry, store, break-down, clean and re-assemble each of their firearms."

Every gun owner I have ever known regularly demonstrates their proficiency with their firearms, they practice, they train, and they shoot.

I don't know any h****r who loads his or her rifle with a 30 round magazine. Even h****rs that use an AR15 to hunt varmints don't load the gun with 30 round mags. There are options, it isn't etched in stone that an AR15 must be loaded with high cap mags. There are 5 and 10 round magazines available for the AR.

You do know, don't you, that criminals do not obey laws, that's why the cops go after them after they commit a crime, that's why they are prosecuted and locked up if found guilty. Gun control laws, no matter how stringent or prohibitive you make them, have no effect on the lawless. Gun control laws criminalize law abiding citizens.

You sure as hell don't need to resort to satire to expose who you are. You never fail to exploit your stupidity and vices, the most pronounced of which are arrogance and bigotry.

"It's blasphemy to call Jesus a Conservative? How precious..." is an excellent example.

Don't insult our intelligence by telling us to "research the 2nd Amendment". If you want the context in which it was written, I suggest you read the Federalist Papers (#29 and #46 would be a good start.)

What makes you think that the only thing we can protect ourselves with is an AR15?

Where did you get the idea that our right to bear arms obligates us to "participate in a well-regulated m*****a"?

Our right to defend our lives and Property is unalienable. That right cannot be taken away from or given away by the possessor, it is inviolable.

A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State is the prefatory clause in the 2nd amendment.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed is the operative clause.

Your failure to grasp the concept of this is your problem, not mine.

The United States bought Louisiana from the French for $18.00 per square mile. Helluva deal.

Duh!

How does Gillibrand propose to do such a thing? She can kiss my red, white and blue ass.

How many sides do you see?

Can the hyperbole, OK? I know what it like to pull the dead bodies of men, women and children out of the rubble and ashes of burned homes and buildings, out of the twisted and smashed remains of a vehicle, I know what it is like trying to comfort their surviving family and friends. And, I know what it is like to save the lives of injured victims of these tragic events.

Since 1982, 1069 people have been k**led in random mass shootings. This does not include targeted k*****gs such as occurred in Dayton, OH or those that occur in a dysfunctional family or when a disgruntled employee takes out his boss and fellow employees, or a r****t sniper ambushes police officers--I mean random mass shootings such as Columbine, VA Tech, Aurora theater, Sandy Hook, Parkland, Las Vegas.

1069 people k**led over a period of 37 years, though tragic in the circumstance, is an average of 29 victims per year.

Now, let's consider the numerous studies and research into defensive gun use by legally armed citizens. These studies were conducted by university criminologists, police and federal law enforcement associations, the National Institute of Justice, the CDC and the DOJ.

A study in 1997 conducted by Dr. Gary Kleck, professor of criminology and criminal justice at Florida State University in Tallahassee (with Marc Gertz). Dr. Kleck is a member of the ACLU, Amnesty International USA, and Common Cause. He is not and has never been a member of or contributor to any advocacy group on either side of the gun control debate, and he is not a member of the NRA,

This study revealed that a legally armed citizen (or citizens) stopped a crime or prevented a violent attack by a human or an animal 2.5 million times per year. In only 8% of these incidents was the attacker k**led or wounded. This study was first published in The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Northwestern University School of Law, and it was later published in a book--Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America. This book has become a widely cited source in the gun control debate. In fact, this book earned Dr. Kleck the prestigious American Society of Criminology Michael J. Hindelang award

Dr. Kleck's work was later confirmed by the DOJ (although the DOJ reduced the number of incidents by 1 million).

In “A Tribute to a View I Have Opposed,” Marvin E. Wolfgang writes that, “What troubles me is the article by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz. The reason I am troubled is that they have provided an almost clear-cut case of methodologically sound research in support of something I have theoretically opposed for years, namely, the use of a gun in defense against a criminal perpetrator…. I have to admit my admiration for the care and caution expressed in this article and this research. Can it be true that about two million instances occur each year in which a gun was used as a defensive measure against crime? It is hard to believe. Yet, it is hard to challenge the data collected. We do not have contrary evidence.”

Research directed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveals that guns are used 16 to 100 times more often to protect life than to take life. That means there are a whole lot of “guns save lives stories” not being reported.

Now that we have a defensible foundation for the right of law abiding Americans to carry a gun along with credible statistics backing it up, let's ask the question: If a legally armed citizen stops a crime or an attack 1 or 2 million times per year, how many lives are saved?

Like repeating the Clinton Arkancide conspiracy theories for 20 some years.

In case you didn't know this, the Clintons don't wear red capes and blue suits with an "S" on the chest. They are not faster than a speeding bullet, they are not more powerful than a locomotive, they are not able to leap tall buildings in a single bound.

FORMER Chief Justice Burger.

The idea that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of an individual to own a gun is a "fraud" according to the late Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger. Burger's pronouncement is quoted prominently in current advertising by the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, the tax-exempt arm of Handgun Control, Inc.

Not surprisingly, the advertisements don't cite the place where the former Chief Justice set forth his analysis of the Second Amendment.

Because Burger never said anything about the Second Amendment when he was actually on the Supreme Court. (Half a dozen Supreme Court decisions affirm that the Second Amendment is an individual right.)

Nor did Mr. Burger write anything about the Second Amendment in a scholarly legal or historical journal. (The scholarly consensus is virtually unanimous that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right).

No, the Chief Justice wrote about the Second Amendment in Parade magazine, in a short article in January 1990. (A shorter version was later printed in some newspaper editorials.) This article represents, in a sense, the high-water mark for anti-Second Amendment "scholarship." Because the gun prohibition lobbies will continue to promote the late Mr. Burger's "research" about the Second Amendment.

On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court affirmed by a v**e of 5 to 4 the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Heller v. District of Columbia. The Supreme Court struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, determined that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment, found that the Regulations Act was an unconstitutional ban, and struck down the portion of the Regulations Act that requires all firearms including rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock". Prior to this decision the Firearms Control Regulation Act of 1975 also restricted residents from owning handguns except for those registered prior to 1975.

FYI: We do not have "unfettered access to any kind of weapon." Don't believe me? Try me, I'll prove it.

That's where his brains are, if he did that, he'd k**l himself.