One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Cool Breeze
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 next>>
Feb 22, 2014 10:42:34   #
ldsuttonjr wrote:
Cool Breeze: You lose a lot of credence with these worthless links!!!!


Why? Is it because they dispute your alarmist paranoid obstructionist narratives. You lose more credibility when no have no reference point to support your position. Rants aren't facts!
Go to
Feb 21, 2014 10:03:37   #
bdamage wrote:
K*****g Free Speech

The IRS is the left's favorite weapon to punish American's like us who dare to exercise our right to free speech and to make our political views known.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3firg6J7T_g&feature=youtu.be


This endless witch hunt of Obama by republicans has to cease someday. Hopefully when he's finally out of office! These conservatives must love Red Herrings! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/earl-ofari-hutchinson/why-the-public-should-yaw_b_3300263.html
Go to
Feb 21, 2014 09:00:12   #
alex wrote:
have you been asleep, now that is a stupid question


I read your narrative but that's just what it is your story! Just because you've made a statement don't make it fact! Back it up! Or do you consider that stupid.
Go to
Feb 20, 2014 17:46:54   #
Old_Gringo wrote:
If you would listen to someone other than Reid and Peelosi, you would have your evidence.


Well who should I be listening to? Give me a link and I shall explore the matter further unless this is just a propagandist rant! :roll:
Go to
Feb 20, 2014 17:33:24   #
alex wrote:
only half the congress is a do nothing, and that is the senate
How about some evidence supporting your claim.

:-o
Go to
Feb 20, 2014 12:59:43   #
bdamage wrote:
Really?

Rachel Maddow....the queen of MSNBC?
You're friggin' joking, right?

Rachel Maddow Show

Maddow's Shabbiness in Selective Citing of Party ID Apparently Boundless
By Jack Coleman | February 14, 2014

Can MSNBC's Rachel Maddow go a single day without descending into laughable hackdom?

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/media-places/cable-television/msnbc/rachel-maddow-show#ixzz2tsRY2uug
So it's Rachel Maddow's fault! You cant believe this without tongue in cheek!
Go to
Feb 20, 2014 09:46:40   #
cold iron wrote:
The IRS Is About To Become The Arbiter Of Your 1st Amendment Rights By Obama Regime Decree.

The same IRS that was recently caught red-handed targeting conservative organizations, and the same IRS that is going to administer your personal healthcare under ObamaCare, is about to grant itself broad powers to muzzle your 1st Amendment rights through the tax code.

But Barack Obama isn't asking for legislation from Congress to grant the IRS these powers. Mr. I-Have-A-Pen-And-I-Have-A-Phone is going to do it by decree, and the only body that can stop him is the United States Congress.

Enough is enough. They've been feckless in the past but Barack Obama has gone so far that our elected officials must be pushed to action. I have to be honest with you, the future of our Republic is in your hands. Call or fax your congressmen/congresswoman today.
The IRS Is About To Become The Arbiter Of Your 1st... (show quote)
Sir don't you think that your assessment is a little over the top? If President Obama has become the "Imperial President" then we have no one but the Do nothing Congress to blame! http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/the-do-nothing-congress-may-yet-do-less
Go to
Feb 20, 2014 09:13:16   #
banjojack wrote:
As a matter of fact, semantics IS my forte. Apparently yours is being tedious, misinformed, obtuse, and non-sensical. Tip for the day: Knowing how to spell a word does not automatically confer knowledge of it's definition, or correct usage in a sentence. You're beginning to bore me. I don't wish to play any more. Go hump someone else's leg.


:D Thanks for commenting! I find your verbose pseudo-intelligent rants amusing. Contact me as soon as you get your diaper changed! Good Day! :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 13:59:45   #
banjojack wrote:
His entire post shows an incredibly well developed sense of invincible ignorance. He is becoming tedious. Not to mention Pavlovian in his responses, much like some others I could name. I'm tired of playing with him. He can play with himself
Invincible ignorance? That's an oxymoron if I ever heard one and a quality that you possess! Pavlovian in your self stimulated responses? Nice confession! See a priest next time LOL

:thumbup:
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 13:51:18   #
banjojack wrote:
By dubious and suspect, that means anyone who dares to disagree with you in any particular on anything? US News and World Report is wrong, NBC News is wrong, I could have included the statistics from the US Bureau of Statistics, but why bother? They are wrong, too, because they have the temerity to contradict your biases. You have offered no facts or t***h, you have merely dismissed source after source proving you wrong as being suspect.
Sir your arrogance is amazing! I noticed that you haven't mentioned any links that I have provided. Could it be that you are guilty of the indiscretions that you accuse me of! I didn't say they were wrong, I said they was suspect and I still say it. I take it that you are not biased! BS! You haven't proved anything all of it is perception although mine is more accurate than yours! We agree to disagree although two diametrically opposed opinions both cannot be right! Somebody's incorrect and we both know who that is! Time will tell!
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 13:35:26   #
banjojack wrote:
Since you have no idea what ethnically exclusive means, No, it is not ethnically exclusive. Had I claimed this was endemic to b****s, it would have been "ethnically exclusive."
That was a question not a declaration! you do know the difference don't you! Since you made the inane out of wedlock comment that constituted your "endemic" predisposition for you implied that it was. Semantics isn't your forte.
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 13:27:38   #
ginnyt wrote:
I wonder, are you inside my mind? Or perhaps you are God and can see what I am thinking or experience my feelings. Or is it that you would like to think you are clever, educated, intuitive, or just blessed with the ability to "know" people by just reading an afternoon of communication.

Actually, I am a very unemotional individual. I do not care about you, whether you live or die, if you are hungry, angry, tired, impressed, unimpressed, smart, dumb, or what you may think about me.
I wonder, are you inside my mind? Or perhaps you ... (show quote)
Excuse Me? I think you take yourself too seriously to believe that you are that important! you aren't! You being a emotionally or spiritually dead individual is your concern! I suggest psychotherapy before your condition worsens!
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 13:21:04   #
ginnyt wrote:
You and I could go on with your attempts to insult me and try to provoke me to respond in kind. But, it will not work. Therefore I am leaving you in your emotional hysteria and moving on to other threads where people think. Do have a lovely evening.
Accept my apologies I didn't realize that facts and t***h offended you! Since you are content with you dubious and highly suspect narratives I have no objections. I'm sorry I cannot be a member of your "irrational club!"
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 13:15:10   #
banjojack wrote:
You are an i***t. Read the post, you moron. I said that about 70% of black children were born out of wedlock, one parent homes. The NBC News link I supplied, that you claimed I did not, is the one that has the 72% figure. I said that I COULD HAVE obtained similar figures from Fox, but you wouldn't have believed those, which is why I used the ones from NBC. I supplied the link. Any credibility issues you think you have should be addressed to the National Broadcasting Corporation. Their figures. My quote was a very close approximation. You are either being deliberately obtuse, or you are an imbecile. I do not believe you to be an imbecile, therefore your circular logic and denial must be an affectation.
You are an i***t. Read the post, you moron. I said... (show quote)
I agree there is i***t here and guess who it is? You used the NBC as a link so I assumed that you basically agreed and knew what you talking about. I was wrong it's apparent you don't! You was right about one thing. I don't trust FOX! The NBC statistics are suspect too but that is another story. In the future if you cannot honestly stand behind the your links refrain from posting them. It makes you appear to be a disingenuous moron.
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 17:19:03   #
ginnyt wrote:
The difference. An unborn child has no say. No v**e. No voice. A teenager, who should have been taught right from wrong, has a say, a voice, a v**e and should be in control of their actions.

I do respect life. Heck, I am a vegan. Having said that, it is worthwhile to note, that I do not see criminals as sacred, as someone to defend. A criminal is just that, someone who elects to break the laws. The rights of the innocent is not subject to debate. They are innocent and should be protected.

BTW, the youth in this case were NOT children.
The difference. An unborn child has no say. No v... (show quote)


Neither is a Fetus a child! A fetus has no constitutional rights. If the do prove it!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.