rumitoid wrote:
Nut-shell is correct.
This is a nutshell………actual data! You have once again chosen Drama over reality! The danger for healthy children is extremely low! Why would parents give their child a v*****e that has not been proven to protect us from catching C***D! In fact, more and more information is being revealed of some very serious side effects, including death. The children that have died were children with other serious health problems. Until a v*****e can be PROVEN safe and effective for children………..It should not be even considered!
https://www.aap.org/en/pages/2019-novel-c****av***s-c****-**-infections/children-and-c****-**-state-level-data-report/Summary of Findings (data available as of 10/14/21) :
Cumulative Number of Child C****-** Cases*
6,177,946 total child C****-** cases reported, and children represented 16.4% (6,177,946/37,611,563) of all cases
Overall rate: 8,208 cases per 100,000 children in the population
Change in Child C****-** Cases*
130,575 child C****-** cases were reported the past week from 10/7/21-10/14/21 (6,047,371 to 6,177,946) and children represented 25.5% (130,575/512,399) of the weekly reported cases
Over two weeks, 9/30/21-10/14/21, there was a 5% increase in the cumulated number of child C****-** cases since the beginning of the p******c (278,798 cases added (5,899,148 to 6,177,946))
Testing (11 states reported)*^
Among states reporting, children made up between 11.6%-22.3% of total cumulated state tests, and between 5.2%-18.4% of children tested were tested positive
Hospitalizations (24 states and NYC reported)*
Among states reporting, children ranged from 1.6%-4.2% of their total cumulated hospitalizations, and 0.1%-2.0% of all their child C****-** cases resulted in hospitalization
Mortality (45 states, NYC, PR and GU reported)*
Among states reporting, children were 0.00%-0.25% of all C****-** deaths, and 7 states reported zero child deaths
In states reporting, 0.00%-0.03% of all child C****-** cases resulted in death