I understand...

When I taught for a private training school, and did my work experience at a private kindergarten, there were similar rules...

Parents are expected to comply with the rules set by the school...

Couldn't she just have her son wait ten minutes then leave the school? Or write a letter of apology? We all have our moments...

Sorry I'm not more sympathetic... I've dealt with a lot of parents who behave in ways they normally wouldn't when in a school... Some seem to think that they are somehow an authority figure because they pay school fees...

Your grandson will get over it... Probably just a bit embarrassed...

I went through junior high school with my mother battling the school board because of "illegal" fees collected to run programs like shop or home ec that were outside the regular system... Very awkward at times...

Give him a slap on the back and take him fishing... Then send him back to school... He'll be fine...

Cheers Permi

So! This was nothing more than a bet! At no point did you indicate that your daughter had a mental problem and was apparently asking for help in an unusual action! You indicated that she was spoiled, did you forget this? This is f**e as a two dollar bill! You didn’t want compassion, you worded it in a manner to receive derogatory remarks, not compassion, in order to win your bet!

Then you went right back to your usual TDS meltdown! Do you have any idea how much time you are wasting on your continual h**e and bitterness. Perhaps your daughter would be less volatile if you didn’t constantly spew hatred! I suggest that you spend some quality time with your daughter and try to find out what her problem is and what you can do to help her instead making senseless bets using her problems as your bet! What kind of Dad does that!

Your take on funds to buy arms just doesn't jive with the facts. Some funds could be used for defense, but nothing in the way of arming Ukraine to stop Russian invasion.

"While not without controversy, the Obama administration’s Ukraine policy was instrumental for Ukraine’s development after the Maidan. The highest profile debate regarding U.S. policy towards Ukraine has been whether to provide the country with lethal (but defensive) weapons. In December 2014, Congress passed the Ukraine Freedom Support Act, which gave the U.S. government the authority to spend $350 million on defensive weapons for Ukraine.4 Many Obama administration officials — among them Secretary of State John Kerry, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, Supreme Allied Commander in Europe Philip Breedlove, and Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland — had advocated for President Obama to send Ukraine the authorized weapons.5 They argued that increasing Ukraine’s military capabilities would both send a strong signal and raise costs for possible Russian escalation. Numerous members of Congress from both parties have also pushed the administration to arm Ukraine. Those who do not want to arm Ukraine claim that Russia could easily increase its support to the separatists, thus negating the effect of any aid the U.S. sends, while making the war longer and bloodier. They are also wary of the possibility of entering into what they view as a U.S.-Russia proxy war, noting that Ukraine has the capability to produce its own weapons. Due to these conflicting views and concerns, the $350million for lethal aid remains unspent."

"said an EU diplomat involved in the discussions" about others wanting Shokin removed. LOL! It's always anonymous sources with you l*****ts. Sorry, but no cigar!

As for Pelosi, it was obvious when she made claims about the complaint and the phone call which simply weren't there, nor had any of it actually been released when she made her comments. She blew it, pure and simple, believing what Schiff was telling her.

Where is your evidence that other countries wanted Ukraine to fire Shokin?

What other countries has Trump denied or delayed aid to since getting into office?

Why didn't the House want to impeach Obama when he denied lethal aid to Ukraine for 8 long years allowing Russia to invade Crimea and Eastern Ukraine which y'all say is a danger to our national security?

Which presidents in our history have NOT invoked executive privilege?

Shouldn't Pelosi have at least read the whistle blower's complaint or read the transcript of the "call" before announcing an upcoming impeachment based upon those two things??????

Is there ANYTHING in the democrats assault on President Trump that isn't a twist of the t***h or an out and out lie???

How do y'all look yourselves in the mirror considering all that y'all have done to try to undermine an American president??

When candidate Trump lost the popular v**e in 2016, who won the presidency? LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We have been at war with muslims since the beginning of USA. George Washington paid them tribute to prevent their attacks on USA shipping in the medderian sea. It remained that way until Thomas Jefferson. He created what is now known as marines. They were placed on American ships for protection. They wore heavy leather collars to prevent their heads being chopped off. Ala. "Leaternecks" The marines followed any survivors back to their villages and k**led everybody..

Muslims have been a problem for a while. 1952 we passed a law that prevented muslims from holding public office in USA. IN 1990 we passed a law overturning the 1952 law. And our troubles are really beginning.

They congugrate in areas which gives them numbers for smaller e******ns. We have them as representatives mayors, school board members the list goes on.

Now we have schools teaching muslim, but our kids can't pray to Christ or God. They want to convert our kids to make it easier to convert adults. If the school serves pork they use and usually win. If they don't want their kids to eat pork fix their meals for their kids to know what they are eating. It is not the schools responsibility to know who can eat what.
Prisoners in a prison sued and won because they were not fed hadal meat and did not have prayer areas. Bull s**t! THEY broke the law and give up certain rights. If prayer area is that important to them don't break the law and be put away. If you question their dress they sue saying you hurt their feelings. Again bull s**t! It says you will assimilate to our way of life to be a citizen. Let us pass a law if you don't assimilate as you agreed remove their citizenship and deport. They wanted to come here we did not ask them to come.

Sharia law is in total conflict with our constitution and shouldn't be allowed. If they dress as muslim or believe in sharia law they should be refused entry. If they start dressing as muslims depot immediately.

This nation was founded on Christian principles and the oath of office is sworn on the Bible not their Koran or any other book. If they refuse then don't let them take office. What is the problem with that? Obama would have had to change or not be president.

I like my country the way it is. I do not need it changed to the s**t hole muslims live in.

Have you never heard the phrase, "money talks and (bovine scat) walks"?

Political power can and has been bought, and that is where and how Soros wields his power, and bankrolls others to do his bidding, as do international bankers. It is the epitome of hypocrisy and an oxymoron, to call the labors of such ilk as "fighting for liberty".

Here's my post, thanks for the invitation to share it here:

https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-174356-1.html#3130786

The "left" is not "right" in so many ways...

How many times have we heard l*****ts say nobody is going to take away your guns?

https://www.westernjournal.com/dan-crenshaw-ted-cruz-watch-mock-liberals-stupid-gun-lies/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=conservative-tribune

The left’s war on America is fundamentally a war of thought control against individual human liberty.

This article, unfortunately, begins with the premise that our right to bear arms is “a fundamental Constitutional right”. For me at least, that isn’t quite accurate enough. Rather, the “right” to bear arms is a fundamental “human right”, higher than mere government-granted privileges, just like free speech and freedom of religion, for examples, that the Constitution “recognizes” and “protects” but does not technically “grant”.

Thus, make no mistake, the left’s war on the Constitutionally recognized and protected “rights” is a war on basic “human rights”.

So, in reality, being a “l*****t” means supporting what you have “left” when all your individual “human rights” have been sacrificed to the tyranny of the “authoritarian collective”. Thus a more descriptive term for their ideology is "what-is-LEFT-ist" after your rights are taken away. This is a win-lose proposition, where human rights are sacrificed and lost. The winners are only the politicians in “control” of doling out the privileges, which they equate to “rights” they “give” to you (or take away from you), as their subordinates.

It wasn’t godless atheists who gave this country our freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to bear arms, government of, by and for the people: it was, for the most part, highly religious persons who did so. They did not create this country so as to have "left behind” human rights, convictions or responsibilities; they created this country to highlight our basic human rights, to honor them, and protect them: because they are our “rights”, not merely our “benefits” somehow graciously bestowed upon us by tyrannical leaders, as if we were their serfs or s***es. Not all tyrants are individuals; in that, once again, the left is not right.

This is why I identify politically as “a right-wing conservative”; it is because I identify with acknowledging and protecting, and yes, even and particularly “conserving”, basic human “rights.” It is this liberty which recognizes my God-given right and responsibility not only to live, but also to speak from my conscience regardless of whether my ideology aligns with the “collective authority” of the state. C*******m, which is directly and purposefully responsible for the deaths of 100’s of millions, is the ultimate expression of the "what’s-LEFT-ist” ideology. What kind of people, other than tyrants, would wish to impose such an ideology on US?

Thus the "what’s-LEFT-ist” ideology is not something I’ll ever go along with.

-Tommy Raddatz