One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Common_Sense_Matters
Page: <<prev 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 172 next>>
Jul 6, 2019 02:52:44   #
son of witless wrote:
Projection, projection, projection. You project your Messiah complex on us normals. You are the ones who think Obama was Super Duper great. We normals look upon Donald J. Trump as our employee. He works for US. He understands that. Unlike Obama, who saw himself as our mighty all powerful ruler.


I have no "messiah complex", you on the other hand, we all KNOW you DO. You can see no wrong in your "god" (Trump) because if you saw any wrong in him, then you would have to admit that he ISN'T perfect and that would destroy your delusions of him as the second coming.
Go to
Jul 6, 2019 02:18:27   #
PeterS wrote:
Man, I'm glad we won...


Was that the very jet that dropped the nuke on Covfefe Hill to win us that battle?
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 21:06:20   #
factnotfiction wrote:
Absolutely with some of his supporters as demonstrated in their ridiculous posts above


The teleprompter went on the blink and they suspect it was due to the rain. Perhaps the rain made Trump's brain go on the blink. Yes FNF, Trump is stupid enough to think there were airports long BEFORE planes were invented. This wasn't Trump's first round of stupid statements, any time he is forced to go off script or just chooses to, he always says stupid things, it is called stupidity and his supporters are too ignorant to come to grips with Trump's stupidity.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 05:56:50   #
Larai wrote:
What part of go away did you not understand?


If you wish someone to leave you alone, you must first stop making accusations against them. You can not perform a drive by accusation and not expect a reply. But again, I am neglecting to keep your limited intellect in mind, that is my own fault. you can get back to your keeping up on the latest theories, I will not bother you again without you pestering me first, as you did this time around. I was ignoring you as I had you pegged as just another nut job, conspiracy theorist the first day you posted on this site.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 05:18:48   #
Larai wrote:
Boy.. you are a waste of my time.. you deem a documentary as conspiracy theory without watching it Bc you deem it a waste of your time Is NOT my problem have a nice day sir.. have a nice time.. I for one am not a party to socialism!!.. this country is better than that... no matter what you say. The fact that you won't even acknowledge that this is a factual portrail of events is not my problem I am NOT trying to change your point of view NOR did I say to do so.. but I find it highly amusing that you won't even acknowledge there is t***h in what he says.. so go away and don't bother rebutting this statement much as I said in my last post NOR did I ask you to comment on it!!.. I will never get why people find it necessary to comment on s**t they don't agree with why not just scroll on by and ignore it, that is after all what libs do every day.. Ignore the will of the people. Period. Now go away.. bye!
Boy.. you are a waste of my time.. you deem a docu... (show quote)


I don't do conspiracy theory. I shouldn't have to keep repeating that statement but it seems you are too intellectually deficient to understand it and too stubborn to have someone help explain it to you. Since he is a well know conspiracy theorist, I will not trouble myself to listen to him speak nor read anything he may write. If at sometime in the future, I decide to research conspiracy theories, then perhaps at that time I may ask you to provide a link to his best theories, until such time, don't bother.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 05:11:43   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Maybe this will help.


Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History

Here’s what the former president of the United States had to say when he eulogized his mentor, an Arkansas senator:

We come to celebrate and give thanks for the remarkable life of J. William Fulbright, a life that changed our country and our world forever and for the better. . . . In the work he did, the words he spoke and the life he lived, Bill Fulbright stood against the 20th century’s most destructive forces and fought to advance its brightest hopes.

So spoke President William J. Clinton in 1995 of a man was among the 99 Democrats in Congress to sign the “Southern Manifesto” in 1956. (Two Republicans also signed it.) The Southern Manifesto declared the signatories’ opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education and their commitment to segregation forever. Fulbright was also among those who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That filibuster continued for 83 days.

Speaking of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, let’s review (since they don’t teach this in schools): The percentage of House Democrats who supported the legislation? 61 percent. House Republicans? 80 percent. In the Senate, 69 percent of Democrats v**ed yes, compared with 82 percent of Republicans. (Barry Goldwater, a supporter of the NAACP, v**ed no because he thought it was unconstitutional.)

When he was running for president in 2000, Vice President Al Gore told the NAACP that his father, Senator Al Gore Sr., had lost his Senate seat because he v**ed for the Civil Rights Act. Uplifting story — except it’s false. Gore Sr. v**ed against the Civil Rights Act. He lost in 1970 in a race that focused on prayer in public schools, the Vietnam War, and the Supreme Court.

Al Gore’s reframing of the relevant history is the story of the Democratic party in microcosm. The party’s history is pockmarked with r****m and terror. The Democrats were the party of s***ery, black codes, Jim Crow, and that miserable terrorist excrescence, the Ku Klux Klan. Republicans were the party of Lincoln, Reconstruction, anti-lynching laws, and the civil rights acts of 1875, 1957, 1960, and 1964. Were all Republicans models of rectitude on racial matters? Hardly. Were they a heck of a lot better than the Democrats? Without question.

As recently as 2010, the Senate’s president pro tempore was former Ku Klux Klan Exalted Cyclops Robert Byrd (D., W.Va.). Rather than acknowledge their sorry history, modern Democrats have rewritten it.

The Democrats have been sedulously rewriting history for decades.

You may recall that when MSNBC was commemorating the 50th anniversary of segregationist George Wallace’s “Stand in the Schoolhouse Door” stunt to prevent the integration of the University of Alabama, the network identified Wallace as “R., Alabama.”

The Democrats have been sedulously rewriting history for decades. Their preferred version pretends that all the Democratic r****ts and segregationists left their party and became Republicans starting in the 1960s. How convenient. If it were true that the South began to turn Republican due to Lyndon Johnson’s passage of the Civil Rights Act, you would expect that the Deep South, the states most associated with r****m, would have been the first to move. That’s not what happened. The first southern states to trend Republican were on the periphery: North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. (George Wallace lost these v**ers in his 1968 bid.) The v**ers who first migrated to the Republican party were suburban, prosperous New South types. The more Republican the South has become, the less r****t.

Is it unforgivable that Bill Clinton praised a former segregationist? No. Fulbright renounced his r****t past, as did Robert Byrd and Al Gore Sr. It would be immoral and unjust to misrepresent the history.

What is unforgivable is the way Democrats are still using race to foment hatred. Remember what happened to Trent Lott when he uttered a few dumb words about former segregationist Strom Thurmond? He didn’t get the kind of pass Bill Clinton did when praising Fulbright. Earlier this month, Hillary Clinton told a mostly black audience that “what is happening is a sweeping effort to disempower and disenfranchise people of color, poor people and young people from one end of our country to another. . . . Today Republicans are systematically and deliberately trying to stop millions of American citizens from v****g.” She was presumably referring to v**er-ID laws, which, by the way, 51 percent of b***k A******ns support.
Comments

R****m has an ugly past in the Democratic party. The accusation of r****m has an ugly present.
Maybe this will help. br br br b Whitewashing t... (show quote)


Wikipedia wrote:
Former Governor of Alabama George Wallace ran in the 1968 United States p**********l e******n as the candidate for the American Independent Party. Wallace's pro-segregation policies during his term as Governor of Alabama were rejected by the mainstream of the Democratic Party. The impact of the Wallace campaign was substantial, winning the e*******l v**es of several states in the Deep South. Although Wallace did not expect to win the e******n, his strategy was to prevent either major party candidate from winning a majority in the E*******l College. This would throw the e******n into the House of Representatives, where Wallace would have bargaining power sufficient to determine, or at least strongly influence, the se******n of a winner.
Former Governor of Alabama George Wallace ran in t... (show quote)


As I said, the Democrats gave up their claim to r****m and the Republicans snapped it up in the mid 60's. That was why the southern states flipped from Democratic to Republican. They were pissed at Johnson for encouraging desegregation.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 04:37:57   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Well, let's see, to back you up, you link to:
slate.com,
projects.propublica,
pogo.org,
usatoday.com,
bulletin.represent.us,
publicintegrity.org,
propublica.org,
theintercept.com,
chicagotribune.com, t
hestar.com,
mediabiasfactcheck.com,
pamplinmedia.com,
nbcnews.com,

Just to name a few, and these have no mixed factual rating or political lean, Is that right?


Nice try, try posting the entirety of that statement, "The article you posted is from a site with a mixed factual rating and far right political lean. As I have pointed out in the past, I prefer more factual and less biased sources.".

I love how you selectively grab only the portion you wish to grab hoping to trip me up. There are very few completely non-biased sources so if I limited myself to only completely non-biased sources, I would be quite uninformed wouldn't I? I just don't bother with trash sources, your favorite kind of source.

As for the sources, many I don't recognize so I would guess that I rarely read from them if ever. I did look at some but to be honest, due to your poor sk**ls, not a one is a clickable link nor do any link to any story that might refresh my poor memory and since some are harder to research as their names are not unique enough to distinguish them from similarly named sites, I will not be indulging you tonight. You want to play games, play fairly or play by yourself.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 04:06:13   #
Larai wrote:
Firstly, Have you even bothered to watch anything from Dinesh D'souza?? If not.. then Hush.. you know Nothing...IF you are calling ME a "conspiracy theorist" someone you don't even know nor have ever talked to a derogatory name such as that..we probably have zero to say to each other.. But I will leave you with this..

If that was so why did Obama's admin and he himself feel Dinesh D'souza was a threat enough to get him thrown in jail on such a bulls**t charge as he donated too much as a persoanal donation to his friend to help her campaign ..

Obama hasn't justified any of his own Personal contributions so wtf.. I really don't care. what ya think dear.. your "common sense" comes across more as liberal party line and there is no common sense in the liberal machine. It's all about control. I bet you even think that it was republicans that were the inventors of the KKK and the bringers of the civil war..and the segregation of b****s n w****s I bet you think that the GOP held women back from v****g..guess what...Never happened that was ALL Democrat.. (or at the time of the KKK Dixiecrat) but the opposite is true I'd suggest you look at more than just the lame stream media for your History & Information and stop calling names..as in calling me a "conspiracy theorist". The moment that the name calling begins all intelligent conversation has left the building...it either means you've run out of intelligent things to say..OR you do Not have the vocabulary to carry it off...Oh and Obama describes in his own words, His own Voice, in this Documentary..with Voice clips taken from various campaign speeches from his senate bid as well as his p**********l bid..All HIS Voice!!!.. I'm, contrary to popular belief, Not Deaf!!! I know Obama's voice, as he was in my living room EVERY Freakin Day & Night for 8 freaking years!!..So Dinesh D'souza's Documentary Obama's America is an accurate telling of what it was about and just what he and his muslim father from kenya believed in, Also, IN His own words!! He worshipped his father & wanted to model himself after him.. but come e******n time he denounced his Muslim family in order to get the v**e..He denounced his white mother after he got the v**e..He disavowed his pastor of 20 + years that was practically a father figure bc said pastor was r****t and inflamatory..had to "distance himself" as soon as he won he was inviting extremist muslims into this country . Hence the Muslim enclaves/training camps in this country.. pfft.. conspiracy... get a grip.. *smiles sweetly*
Firstly, Have you even bothered to watch anything ... (show quote)


You just keep failing in your openings. No, I do not watch videos put out by conspiracy theorists. What part of "I do not do conspiracy theory" are you having trouble understanding? I would offer to use simpler words or perhaps slow it down for you but that statement is in some of the easiest English words already and if you need it slowed down, just take your time reading that statement. until we get this misunderstanding worked out, we can not discuss ANYTHING at all. You figure out how to come to grips with the fact that I don't do conspiracy theory and let me know, then we can work on finding things to discuss. Does that work for you or will I have to hire a tutor to come by your place and help you understand simple English?





Edit: I will answer this question for you though as it pertains to the very issue we need to resolve. If you believe in conspiracy theories, then you ARE a conspiracy theorist. You will probably need someone to explain that one to you, take your time and find someone intelligent enough to understand that statement and hopefully they can explain it in simpler terms for you to understand better.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 03:57:29   #
Seth wrote:
Every single time you are here you endorse wh**ever any conservatives are against, and most of the time it is a socialist issue.

Want example? Go back through your posts on your own time. I'm hitting the rack, have to take the boat out early for a sail south, picking up my host at C****ado, want to get back to Marina del Rey before sundown tomorrow.

Later.


Specifically, what socialist programs do I support, you made the claim, not me, it is YOUR job to back your claim, not mine. Don't make the claim if you don't have the juice to back it up, that is not being a moron 101 for you.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 02:49:30   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
That is a picture of Robert Byrd. The title of the article is "Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History". The keyword is HISTORY. The article takes us back to the 1960s.

The R****t History of the Democratic Party goes back to the founding of the democrat party in 1792.

Yeah, many of the r****t democrats are dead, but their r****t history is not. It is alive and well today.


The article you posted is from a site with a mixed factual rating and far right political lean. As I have pointed out in the past, I prefer more factual and less biased sources. The article is about the r****t past of the Democratic party, something that was left behind around the mid 60's. The r****t mantle was taken up by Republicans since then and they are holding strong to it. If we are to ostracize the Democrats for their party's r****t past, shouldn't we therefore ostracize the Republicans for their party's r****t present?

The ONLY person listed in that article that had an administration to be corrupted was Clinton. Obviously I had to assume that he was the point you were attempting to make. Perhaps you need to be more specific in the future.

Quote:
The less r****t the South gets, the more Republican it becomes.
Here’s what the former president of the United States had to say when he eulogized his mentor, an Arkansas senator:

We come to celebrate and give thanks for the remarkable life of J. William Fulbright, a life that changed our country and our world forever and for the better. . . . In the work he did, the words he spoke and the life he lived, Bill Fulbright stood against the 20th century’s most destructive forces and fought to advance its brightest hopes.

So spoke President William J. Clinton in 1995 of a man was among the 99 Democrats in Congress to sign the “Southern Manifesto” in 1956. (Two Republicans also signed it.) The Southern Manifesto declared the signatories’ opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education and their commitment to segregation forever. Fulbright was also among those who filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That filibuster continued for 83 days.
The less r****t the South gets, the more Republica... (show quote)


That portion alone disqualifies the article as it attempts to deceive the reader into thinking, "The less r****t the South gets, the more Republican it becomes." which just isn't so.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 02:23:57   #
Larai wrote:
Watching Dinesh D'souza's Obama's America!! Wow... Why did the American people NOT see his anti-colonialism and why did we not stop it..WTF happened to the republican party when this s**t was going on. I h**e to say this about my party.. but Where the FK were you!!!.. Obama was bad news from JUMP where were the GOP.. how did this Muslim POS get elected as our president and No longer need to ask how muslims got into our gov't.. OBAMA!! Straight UP.. he INVITED THEM HERE!! The GOP did NOTHING. Especially in light of what the Demoncrats are doin now to Demonize Trump... At least Trump isn't inviting our ENEMIES AND those that blew us UP to come on down and join us.. OMFG!!! Freakin dems..piss me off....I V**ed, Where...Where were the rest of the Conservative party during the v****g.. I KNOW if all of us had of gotten out there to v**e Obummer wouldn't had stood a snowballs chance in hell of winning and NOW we are having to undo the Fuckery that was OBUMMER!!!.. and even Now Obummer is a treasonous bastard along with that stupid n**i twitch that is Hitlary!!... Grrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!
Watching Dinesh D'souza's Obama's America!! Wow...... (show quote)


Ah, another conspiracy theorist. I have said this repeatedly but this will be the first time I have said it to you directly, please take note, I do not do conspiracy theory, especially when it has already been debunked. If you wish to discuss things with me, leave out the conspiracy theory. Obama was NOT a Muslim, he was a Protestant, yet the nut jobs refuse to acknowledge the t***h.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 01:56:40   #
Seth wrote:
Sorry, but I don't see how it's possible to forever take the side of socialism and then say you think our system is the "beez knees" or wh**ever.

The two are incompatible.


Okay ignoramus, tell me one socialist program I endorse.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 01:30:13   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
Wrong.

Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History


So someone chooses to take the high road and NOT trash the deceased... And that to you is a scandal? Real scandal is to trash talk the dead, like Trump does. Speaking highly of someone, even if that someone has done despicable things in their past does NOT equate to corruption. There were some things that Fulbright stood for that weren't so despicable as well. Grasping at straws as per usual are we?
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 01:25:44   #
Seth wrote:
Name a country that has a more desirable political system than Amer -- wait, what am I saying? You'll probably say Cuba, or Venezuela...

...Seriously, though, ours is the best political system in the world, its only flaw unforeseen by the founders; that our First Amendment could one day be used against us by a subversive force, as it has today.

That force, in which you are apparently a believer, has succeeded in infiltrating our education system, taking over the lion's share of the media and bought & paid for the Democratic Party. Leftism.

Previously, our political system, in under two centuries, was a primary reason we became the richest, most powerful nation in history, why our invention, innovation and Judeo-Christian foundation has benefitted much if the planet and why we are the most sought after migration destination.

Our constitution provides for more liberty than other countries' and allows our visionaries the room they need to build on their dreams, creating better lives and livelihoods for the many.

If you're an American and even one tenth as intelligent as you seem to believe you are, you shouldn't even question this.

But like I said, the founders never anticipated the kind of treachery we now face from an enemy within that is trying its best to d**g us into the corrupt misery of socialism and a "New World Order," which is what those politicians you and your fellow leftward travelers endorse are all about.
Name a country that has a more desirable political... (show quote)


You just don't seem to get it do you, I blame your intellectual disability. You can forget your bulls**t argument about our political system as you are barking up the wrong tree. I have not spoken out against our political system so your argument falls flat, get over it already.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 01:23:10   #
Ricktloml wrote:
Yes there were 5 states where a******n was legal pre-1973. That doesn't change the fact that Roe V Wade was bad law, even the left admits it, (it's why they fear a challenge so badly.) And NO legal decision will make a******n any less savage, barbaric and uncivilized. But you on the left do crave that power of life and death, especially when the target of your death sentence can in no way fight back. And no I do not agree with the Democrat/socialists. It wasn't President Trump that first weaponized the IRS to rig the 2012 e******ns, then because Obama got away with it, he fully expected to c***t Hillary into office by weaponizing the intelligence and law enforcement agencies, in the worst s*******s, corruption and abuse of power scandal in U.S. history. Granted there are many RINOs in Congress who are if not just as corrupt as the Democrat/socialists, they're certainly close. President Trump has not ignored the rule of law, your claim that he has is simply your opinion, which as an American you are entitled to, unless the Democrat/socialists regain power in which case our liberties will be under the usual assault that leftism/socialism/Marxism/c*******m has historically forced on populations they control. As for any loss of credibility because I reject the false narratives of the left and have the nerve to say so, I don't let that bother me in the least. It is the Democrat/socialists and RINOs who were willing to secure the border during Obama's presidency, (at least they claimed they were going to,) but really they were lying as usual. After all Pelosi, Schummer and the RINOs could hardly say they wanted 25 billion dollars to secure the border WITH some of that money going to erect barriers under Obama and actually do it, they all understood that it was business as usual, lying so the American public would think the rule of law meant something to them. Then for months as 5,000 i******s A DAY streamed across the border, with the help of criminal cartels, (I guess the Democrat/socialists and RINOs are in fact in league with these cartels, talk about ignore the rule of law when you partner with criminal cartels,) they could close the asylum loopholes, and appropriate money to help our overwhelmed Border Patrol, but of course they don't, (for months they outright lied and said there was NO crisis at the border,) talk about a loss of credibility. It is a shame that Democrat/socialists leadership and their accomplices and collaborators in the media have stoked this deranged hatred of President Trump to the point that they themselves are so poisoned they are rabid in their hatred.
Yes there were 5 states where a******n was legal p... (show quote)


Yeah, labeling me a "L*****t", spewing conspiracy theory, showing disloyalty to those within your party with any amount of integrity... You people do love labeling and propaganda.

Sorry, I don't do conspiracy theory.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 172 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.