MsCentralia wrote:
If anything, I would bet anything that Republicans would be against laws that punish innocent people without trial. Innocent until proven guilty is fundamental to our Justice System, but not so of Federal Civil Forfeiture Laws. Unfortunately, it seems that Donald Trump’s choice for Attorney General, Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, is among that small minority of Americans (14%) who reflexively support civil asset forfeiture because it supposedly helps fight crime. At least, those were his thoughts during a Judiciary Committee hearing on civil asset forfeiture in May 2015.
The committee had listened to testimony from Russ Caswell of Tewksbury, MA. He explained how his family-owned motel was seized by federal and local officials because some of his customers had violated drug laws while in the rooms they had rented. That was sufficient grounds for the seizure, which would have netted the cooperating agencies (the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Tewksbury Police) roughly $2 million after selling the property. Caswell would have lost nearly his entire wealth merely because of criminal activity he did not know about occurred on his property. Sessions then lied and said "95% of the cases are of people who've done nothing in their lives but sell dope.”
Institute for Justice attorney Robert Johnson, who offers this devastating rejoinder: “Before government labels someone a ‘criminal,’ it has to secure a criminal conviction. The fact of the matter is, we have no way to know what portion of civil forfeitures involve genuine ‘criminals,’ as the whole point of civil forfeiture is that government can take property without convicting or even charging anyone with a crime.”
Civil asset forfeiture doesn’t just harm innocent people. It also creates incentives that distort the efforts of police departments away from preventing and solving the worst crimes and toward finding the most lucrative pieces of property to seize. During the same hearing, Senator Sessions said there’s “nothing wrong with having the money be given to the officers who helped develop the case.”
How can any America support such an attack on our Constitution and Justice System?
If anything, I would bet anything that Republicans... (
show quote)
This has been a 'hot button' of mine for many years. If CONVICTED then I have no problem with confiscating property. However the present law is open to abuses and the abuses are taken advantage of. The way the law is administered now, in my opinion, is unconstitutional and very definitely un American.