A picture is worth a thousand words:

The reason it passed is because of the majority of the Senate were Democrats. Need to v**e them out, replace them with Conservatives that do listen to American Citizens.

Jewish people do not ask for an apology, nor do they live on handouts from the government, and each time there is an attack there is no running to the media to report it. As a fact, rarely is the police called. It is kept internal, photos of the attackers is given to each Jewish family who avoid contact with the criminals. If one of the families fall on hard times, the colony pitches in with food and necessities until that person or family are back on their feet. As for apology, none is ever expected, but when it comes it is appreciated and that person becomes a friend. We do not ask for anyone to come to help, but when it does come then our hearts open and that person gets a special place in our minds and good will.

I have gone through all the reports regarding this issue. This is what I learned.
1. The dance company had rented the space last January.
2. All the children are white..... video at the bottom of this article http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/12/05/obama-american-university-ballet-company/3877009/
3, Obama insisted the interview be in front of college students http://lonelyconservative.com/2013/12/childrens-nutc*****r-rehearsals-scrapped-to-accommodate-tinglesobama-interview/
4. The university, although stating they will compensate, did not offer an apology

Some will say, so what kids get over things easy and no harm was done. To those people I say, you have never rehearsed for a play or been a dancer. To cram two days of work into the same day as the performance is not easy and can do physical harm. The children (not all ages was given, but the "Mouse" is only 7) will be tired! When you are tired, you make mistakes, mistakes in dance can result in broken ankles, legs, striated muscle tissue, dehydration. Then people will say, well an interview with the president does not happen all the time. Again, you do not watch TV; he is always in campaign mode and not a day passes without seeing him making a speech--little wonder that the congress complain that he does not meet with them. An alternative site could have been arranged, why did it have to be in front of college students....oh ya, Obamacare is failing because college age kids are not participating as required. So, next you will complain that I made an issue of the dance company being white children. Think about this, would he have bumped a black dance company? And really, I am not the only one who thinks that he is NOT impartial. But, that is for another time.

Totally agree! Prevent them from reentering at the border, deport each that is caught, stop the free stuff to include education, food, housing.....make them want to leave. Bury them when they die. It would take 20 years, but at the end we would have documented aliens and those that are undocumented would not be on welfare, unemployment, and they would be well behaved for fear of getting caught. So, street violence, mules carrying drugs..... would decline.

How can they v**e. Seems to be an easy question and one that was raised in 2008 and again in 2012. Many states only ask the question of citizenship. Others ask for a utility bill to verify their address. No state has been allowed by Liberals to put checks in place to make sure that only US citizens are registered. Why, it is because most of the Latino population v**e Democratic. And when I say most, it is close to 94 percent that claim to be Democrats. In 2008 a request was made to the Justice Department to examine v***r f***d. The request was denied. Obama actually encouraged them to v**e, he targeted areas that he knew were hot spots of i******s and actually told them, and I am paraphrasing, that those who did not v**e were v****g for their enemies, the ones who want to deport them. So, they have the backing of the Justice Department, states find their hands bound by Obama and his staff, and the bleeding hearts take to the street to support i******s as though they have a right to break the laws.

http://www.aim.org/guest-column/v**er-fraud-illegal-alien-v**ers-ignored-by-justice-department/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-foster/democrats-benefit-from-illegal-immigrants-v****g_b_1418523.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/us/immigrant-population-shows-signs-of-growth-estimates-show.html?_r=0

Thank you for the post. It is sad, but this activity has been going on as long as I can remember. It has been suggested that I can blend in, that black people are the one's that have been so abused. It has been suggested that I should hide my faith and ethnic background in order to avoid violence at the hands of black youths. Even on this forum! And no one cares! They just say, oh what a shame and then make comments of how b****s have family issues, or they came from s***es. No one stands up; why, well if they did then they too would be targeted. I guess it is the same today as it was 60 years ago or 2000.... it will not change; they h**e the Jews in their neighborhoods because of family values (well that is one reason the article brought up). Perhaps they could learn something from their neighbors instead of being afraid.

The face of r****m, well that face can be any color, any age, and come from all classes.

You are most welcome. Glad I could help.

Oh yes there is, get out an v**e so the law can be repealed. Stop with the defeatist attitude, all laws can be repealed...remember probations?? repealed because the law was harmful and not what the masses wanted.

I agree, with your assessment of VeHoe, and so enjoyed the off the subject chat. I am sure that many did not appreciate me taking so much space to explore tribal thinking, but the diversion was so rewarding.

It was refreshing and I learned from VeHoe. I admire his ability to bridge issues and still remain clear on his point. All without anger!

Excellent point! :thumbup: :thumbup:

What would I tell that veteran, I would not need to tell them anything other than to thank them for their service. The veteran went into the service, all services require a high school diploma and during that education had to take civics, American History along with other courses to graduate. That veteran is well aware that their "Mom" is not in the country legally and it is only a matter of time when all criminals are caught. Therefore, your argument is a mute point.

Laws are not written for the protection or prosecution of a single person but for the masses. Now if you had read, and the more you talk the more I think you do not read any posts and research the comments, you will see that most of the problem with i******s can be taken care of by attrition. Try thinking with your head and not your now anemic heart (anima sets in when you loose too much blood). Read the solution of depletion by attrition I outlined for you. You may not like it, but the solution is there and does not require a mass export of the criminals you are defending.

ILEGAL AILENS ARE NOT COVERED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. Read it, try to understand it. I explained this on another thread. Now here you are again, with the same old tired comments.

It would not be possible as you and some other people suggest, to deport 11 million people at once. It is not logistically feasible because they are not a static group. However, they do drive, rent houses/apartments, apply for assistance. Make documentation a requirement for these activities. If we enforced our current laws and then made it impossible for other i******s to enter our country, it would be easy to hold the number at current population. And with time, reduce the number. How, well as stated they are not static, they go back to their country to visit relatives; stop them when they attempt to reenter the US. They also die; either through happenstance or natural deaths, provide them a funeral and while at the funeral check the group for i******s. This in itself sounds cold, but it would make i******s uncomfortable and persuade them to return back to their own country.

So, bottom line. 1. Enforce the laws, and arm our boarder patrol with instructions to shoot if swamped or when someone will not turn around and return back across the border. 2. Make i******s uncomfortable. Not by harassment, but by requiring proper documentation for getting driver's licenses, apply for grants, and so on. 3. Give them reason to want to leave. If they can not get free food, housing, education, utilities...... then why would they want to stay in the US? 4. If an illegal is stopped for traffic, check for ID. No ID, then arrest. No proof that they are US citizen, deport. Same with police calls to homes for domestic issues. Check, arrest, deport.

Sure, some will be missed because there are good forgeries of identifications; but the vast majority will be caught.

You base your points on the 14th Amendment and I have already addressed that. I did not say that Obama is allowing i******s in through either apathy or inaction. He is deliberate in opening the boarders. People that break the law and enter into my country are criminals, deserving nether my respect or sympathy. They enter under the law, then I welcome them. There is a difference. I do not v**e because an individual has a color tone or a Hispanic name, I v**e for the person who has a proven record. How did they v**e on bills that are important to me. I v**e for a person that has the education, background, and ability to lead a nation and above all has integrity. Color is not an issue. A Hispanic, Japanize, Korean, Native American, Black, or any other color of the rainbow....what does it matter if they are qualified and can lead and be an inspiration? Perhaps it makes a difference to the Liberals, but not to me.