One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: vernon
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 ... 1462 next>>
Mar 1, 2014 10:30:53   #
archie bunker wrote:
Naaah!!! The earth will be burned up by then, and we'll all be dead because of g****l w*****g. BUT...if you would quit breathing, and using our resourses, we might have a chance.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Mar 1, 2014 10:25:26   #
Brian Devon wrote:
Obviously you admire Putin. I'm sure you find his cossack henchmen's whipping of uppity women (Pussy R**t) and bullying of gays appealing. I'm sure Putin's manly-man shirtless horseback riding is quite stimulating to you.

Your ticket is ready. Enjoy your one-way flight to Russia, where men are manly and the sheep are very afraid. You'll fit right in.


no you have a week kneed lying dumbass leading this country and you know it.
Go to
Mar 1, 2014 10:19:01   #
BearK wrote:
Sorry, misread it. If he wants to repeal the 17th - he should jump in the lake. I want to retain that right.



just what right are you going to lose.just imagine if a senator is a loon he can be removed by the syate legislator.
Go to
Mar 1, 2014 10:11:52   #
vernon wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


on second thaught maybe that wouldent work ,they may do it just to get out of this obama created disaster.
Go to
Mar 1, 2014 10:10:20   #
bobgssc wrote:
If Harry gets re-elected, Nevada should be expelled from the union.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Mar 1, 2014 10:08:24   #
Joseph7 wrote:
The republicans are too interested in making money for those who own and operate their office thru them.They MUST secure profit for their owners, and the public be damned.Same way with democrats.


yea soros has doubled his wealth iin the 5yrs of obama and all you can do is spout dem lies
Go to
Mar 1, 2014 09:55:43   #
Kevyn wrote:
Pal, the only thing jammed down your throat is a teabag courtesy of the Koch brothers, one that you obviously longed for!


you are the most uninformed no nothing ive ever read now you should just marry bojester ya'll would make a a cute and stupid couple
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:38:02   #
Kevyn wrote:
“Historically, the leadership of the NRA was more open-minded about gun control than someone familiar with the modern NRA might imagine,” wrote Adam Winkler, a Second Amendment scholar at U.C.L.A. Law School, in his 2011 book, Gunfight: The Battle Over The Right To Bear Arms In America. “The Second Amendment was not nearly as central to the NRA’s identity for most of the organization’s history.”

Once Upon A Time…

The NRA was founded in 1871 by two Yankee Civil War veterans, including an ex-New York Times reporter, who felt that war d**gged on because more urban northerners could not shoot as well as rural southerners. It’s motto and focus until 1977 was not fighting for constitutional rights to own and use guns, but “Firearms Safety Education, Marksmanship Training, Shhoting for Recreation,” which was displayed in its national headquarters.

The NRA’s first president was a northern Army General, Ambrose Burnside. He was chosen to reflect this civilian-m*****a mission, as envisioned in the Second Amendment, which reads, “A well regulated m*****a being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The understanding of the Amendment at the time concerned having a prepared citizenry to assist in domestic military matters, such as repelling raids on federal arsenals like 1786’s Shays R*******n in Massachusetts or the British in the War of 1812. Its focus was not asserting individual gun rights as today, but a ready citizenry prepared by target shooting. The NRA accepted $25,000 from New York State to buy a firing range ($500,000 today). For decades, the U.S. military gave surplus guns to the NRA and sponsored shooting contests.

In the 1920s and 1930s, the NRA’s leaders helped write and lobby for the first federal gun control laws—the very kinds of laws that the modern NRA labels as the height of tryanny. The 17th Amendment outlawing alchohol became law in 1920 and was soon followed by the emergence of big city gangsters who outgunned the police by k*****g rivals with sawed-off shotguns and machine guns—today called automatic weapons.

In the early 1920s, the National Revolver Association—the NRA’s handgun training counterpart—proposed model legislation for states that included requiring a permit to carry a concealed weapon, adding five years to a prison sentence if a gun was used in a crime, and banning non-citizens from buying a handgun. They also proposed that gun dealers turn over sales records to police and created a one-day waiting period between buying a gun and getting it—two provisions that the NRA opposes today.

Nine states adopted these laws: West Virginia, New Jersey, Michigan, Indiana, Oregon, California, New Hampshire, North Dakota and Connecticut. Meanwhile, the American Bar Association had been working to create uniform state laws, and built upon the proposal but made the waiting period two days. Nine more states adopted it: Alabama, Arkansas, Maryland, Montana, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.

State gun control laws were not controversial—they were the norm. Within a generation of the country’s founding, many states passed laws banning any citizen from carrying a concealed gun. The cowboy towns that Hollywood lionized as the ‘Wild West’ actually required all guns be turned in to sheriffs while people were within local city limits. In 1911, New York state required handgun owners to get a permit, following an attempted assassination on New York City’s mayor. (Between 1865 and 1901, three presidents had been k**led by handguns: Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley.) But these laws were not seen as effective against the Depression’s most violent gangsters.

In 1929, Al Capone’s St. Valentine’s Day massacre saw men disguised as Chicago police k**l 7 rivals with machine guns. Bonnie and Clyde’s crime-and-gun spree from 1932-34 was a national sensation. John Dellinger robbed 10 banks in 1933 and fired a machine gun as he sped away. A new president in 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt, made fighting crime and gun control part of his ‘New Deal.’ The NRA helped him draft the first federal gun controls: 1934’s National Firearms Act and 1938’s Gun Control Act.

The NRA President at the time, Karl T. Frederick, a 1920 Olympic gold-medal winner for marksmanship who became a lawyer, praised the new state gun controls in Congress. “I have never believed in the general practice of carrying weapons,” he testified before the 1938 law was passed. “I do not believe in the general promiscuous toting of guns. I think it should be sharply restricted and only under licenses.”

These federal firearms laws imposed high taxes and registration requirements on certain classes of weapons—those used in gang violence like machine guns, sawed-off shotguns and silencers—making it all-but impossible for average people to own them. Gun makers and sellers had to register with the federal government, and certain classes of people—notably convicted felons—were barred from gun ownership. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld these laws in 1939.

The legal doctrine of gun rights balanced by gun controls held for nearly a half-century.

In November 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald shot and k**led President John F. Kennedy with an Italian military surplus rifle that Owsald bought from a mail-order ad in the NRA’s American Rifleman magazine. In congressional hearings that soon followed, NRA Executive Vice-President Frankin Orth supported a ban in mail-order sales, saying, “We do think that any sane American, who calls himself an American, can object to placing into this bill the instrument which k**led the president of the United States.”

But no new federal gun control laws came until 1968. The assassinations of civil rights leader Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy were the tipping point, coming after several summers of race-related r**ts in American cities. The nation’s white political elite feared that violence was too prevalent and there were too many people—especially urban Black nationalists—with access to guns. In May 1967, two dozen Black Panther Party members walked into the California Statehouse carrying rifles to protest a gun-control bill, prompting then-Gov. Ronald Reagan to comment, “There’s no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons.”
“Historically, the leadership of the NRA was more ... (show quote)


bulls**t your only thaught is gun confiscation so quit mouthing off.
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:33:40   #
sbowno1 wrote:
Agreed it will not work! I still think the plan to tax the rich to help the enrich...Deficit will go down tremendous with a purposed smart tax rate probably in one p**********l term. They will not go bankrupt and continue to be rich when they gain back for being smart in general for the future. They can be praised for the lifting of their nation for doing noble works for all their hard work and to give in a lifetime. We need to create more better Americanized trade to keep jobs here. Lock out foreign contracts and redesign the republic of the American dream.
Agreed it will not work! I still think the plan to... (show quote)


every one should pay taxes period. a flat tax of 12%would more than be enough,if you can stop the demorats from buying v**es.
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:26:29   #
permafrost wrote:
This is new to me.. A republican, Dave Camp of Michigan goes to work and creates a tax plan that has some sense and deserves a look. But rejected by his fellows because it is so close to e******n it will "ruffle" feathers... Follow the link and get a short look....



http://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/2014/02/rep-dave-camps-tax-plan-smart-brave-and-going-nowhere?utm_source=MinnPost+e-mail+newsletters&


Rep. Dave Camp's tax plan is smart, brave — and going nowhere
This is new to me.. A republican, Dave Camp of Mic... (show quote)


well he is trying ,more than the assholes you support
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:21:21   #
BearK wrote:
The Tea Party group that wants to repeal the 17th Amendment should go jump in a lake somewhere. I DO NOT want that right taken away from me. If they don't like whomever is running, drum-up opposition - DO NOT CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION for your 'personal' whim.


www did it as an attack on the way the the govt was set up
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:19:10   #
BoJester wrote:
For all of the whining and yapping about the attack on the 2nd amendment, it is surprisingly quiet from the teapartyconservatives and the attack on the 17th amendment.

Imagine that, it is OK for conservativeteaprty types to call for changes they don't like, but NEVER,EVER TOUCH the amendments they do like.

Hmmmm, is the constitution a sacred document or not?


anybody with common sence knows that the 17 amnd is the worst thing ever done to this country and it should be repealed immediatly
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2014/02/conservatives_17th_amendment_repeal_effort_why_their_plan_will_backfire.html
For all of the whining and yapping about the attac... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:14:32   #
oldroy wrote:
Dirty Harry did surely call this woman a liar since he had to include her in the vast majority he called liars. Will he have the guts to apologize to her for what he said? I think not, but who knows what a politician is likely to do to save face.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/02/28/exclusive-gop-ad-hits-back-at-reids-obamacare-comments-n1801892?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm


why dosen't some one in the senate confront him for the lies he tells.im mean he told a lie about a candate for pres and no one went to the podium and said a word ,he speaks on the floor why dont they do it also if they get worse pour it on them.
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:09:01   #
son of witless wrote:
Does anyone believe that Vlad is shaking in his boots when the Obama Administration warns him about the Ukraine?

We have the weakest foreign policy President since Jimmy
Carter. This guy who was gonna get the world's respect is like every other l*****t. They have no clue how to lead a Super Power. I mean former Super Power.


:thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 28, 2014 20:07:41   #
MrEd wrote:
Sure I did a cut a past. Wouldn't you?? I can sit here typing for an hour, or cut and past in 5 minuets or less. Which would you do. Does that make my post wrong?? My point that I was making is that Congress is limited, NOT the states. If you had read it instead of just looking to see if it was a cut a past, you would have seen that. I gave my point of view and a link to back it up. Where is yours, or are you a self proclaimed authority on the subject?


:thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 ... 1462 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.