PeterS wrote:
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean., a black man, legally carrying a gun, is tackled because he (White Guy) thought the black guy was??? Well, just what did the WG think a 62 year old black man with a gun legally holstered was going to do? I know the fine, non-r****t, conservatives of OPP will see no bigotry here; after all, b****s have brought this on themselves right! But this reeks of bigotry if not down right good ole southern r****m! The thing is, this is a holstered weapon, not stuck inside the pocket of a hoody, carried by a gentleman of 62 years, not a thug of 16 years, so it crosses no ones mind that this guy is simply exercising his constitutional rights? Why is it, white males of the conservative variety, think the constitution belongs only to them; that they have a right to carry arms for their protection but others don't have the same right for the same reason? People are lucky that the guy didn't pull his gun and pop a few rounds into his attacker. Of course, then he would have had to argue "stand your ground" so he most likely would have wound up on Florida's death row!
This is a sick country getting sicker every day. Here is something else, there is a very good chance that the fine black gentleman of 62 years was one of the 3% of b****s who are conservative! Yep, he had a gun--because he had a permit to carry it you dumb fuk!
http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/video-released-of-wal-mart-shopper-tackling-legal-gun-owner-video/
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean.... (
show quote)
Actually in the article, it says the white guy was charged, and if you read the comments, apparently it was the anti-gun liberals who got upset that the white guy was arrested. They care more that black guy was carrying a gun than the fact he was black