One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
He's Got A Gun!!!
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
Feb 4, 2015 07:15:55   #
PeterS
 
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean., a black man, legally carrying a gun, is tackled because he (White Guy) thought the black guy was??? Well, just what did the WG think a 62 year old black man with a gun legally holstered was going to do? I know the fine, non-r****t, conservatives of OPP will see no bigotry here; after all, b****s have brought this on themselves right! But this reeks of bigotry if not down right good ole southern r****m! The thing is, this is a holstered weapon, not stuck inside the pocket of a hoody, carried by a gentleman of 62 years, not a thug of 16 years, so it crosses no ones mind that this guy is simply exercising his constitutional rights? Why is it, white males of the conservative variety, think the constitution belongs only to them; that they have a right to carry arms for their protection but others don't have the same right for the same reason? People are lucky that the guy didn't pull his gun and pop a few rounds into his attacker. Of course, then he would have had to argue "stand your ground" so he most likely would have wound up on Florida's death row!

This is a sick country getting sicker every day. Here is something else, there is a very good chance that the fine black gentleman of 62 years was one of the 3% of b****s who are conservative! Yep, he had a gun--because he had a permit to carry it you dumb fuk!

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/video-released-of-wal-mart-shopper-tackling-legal-gun-owner-video/

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 07:20:29   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
PeterS wrote:
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean., a black man, legally carrying a gun, is tackled because he (White Guy) thought the black guy was??? Well, just what did the WG think a 62 year old black man with a gun legally holstered was going to do? I know the fine, non-r****t, conservatives of OPP will see no bigotry here; after all, b****s have brought this on themselves right! But this reeks of bigotry if not down right good ole southern r****m! The thing is, this is a holstered weapon, not stuck inside the pocket of a hoody, carried by a gentleman of 62 years, not a thug of 16 years, so it crosses no ones mind that this guy is simply exercising his constitutional rights? Why is it, white males of the conservative variety, think the constitution belongs only to them; that they have a right to carry arms for their protection but others don't have the same right for the same reason? People are lucky that the guy didn't pull his gun and pop a few rounds into his attacker. Of course, then he would have had to argue "stand your ground" so he most likely would have wound up on Florida's death row!

This is a sick country getting sicker every day. Here is something else, there is a very good chance that the fine black gentleman of 62 years was one of the 3% of b****s who are conservative! Yep, he had a gun--because he had a permit to carry it you dumb fuk!

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/video-released-of-wal-mart-shopper-tackling-legal-gun-owner-video/
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean.... (show quote)


:shock: :shock: :? :?

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 07:32:08   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
PeterS wrote:
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean., a black man, legally carrying a gun, is tackled because he (White Guy) thought the black guy was??? Well, just what did the WG think a 62 year old black man with a gun legally holstered was going to do? I know the fine, non-r****t, conservatives of OPP will see no bigotry here; after all, b****s have brought this on themselves right! But this reeks of bigotry if not down right good ole southern r****m! The thing is, this is a holstered weapon, not stuck inside the pocket of a hoody, carried by a gentleman of 62 years, not a thug of 16 years, so it crosses no ones mind that this guy is simply exercising his constitutional rights? Why is it, white males of the conservative variety, think the constitution belongs only to them; that they have a right to carry arms for their protection but others don't have the same right for the same reason? People are lucky that the guy didn't pull his gun and pop a few rounds into his attacker. Of course, then he would have had to argue "stand your ground" so he most likely would have wound up on Florida's death row!

This is a sick country getting sicker every day. Here is something else, there is a very good chance that the fine black gentleman of 62 years was one of the 3% of b****s who are conservative! Yep, he had a gun--because he had a permit to carry it you dumb fuk!

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/video-released-of-wal-mart-shopper-tackling-legal-gun-owner-video/
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean.... (show quote)


Nice bit of setting up a straw-man and then knocking it down. How do you know what will happen? Let's wait and see. If the guy is guilty of assault then he should be charged. Right? Apparently the white guy was the one at fault. It looked as though the black guy was just minding his business. I wasn't there and I don't think you were. Let's see who gets charged.

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 07:35:34   #
PeterS
 
bylm1 wrote:
Nice bit of setting up a straw-man and then knocking it down. How do you know what will happen? Let's wait and see. If the guy is guilty of assault then he should be charged. Right? Apparently the white guy was the one at fault. It looked as though the black guy was just minding his business. I wasn't there and I don't think you were. Let's see who gets charged.

So you think who gets charged is the issue! White pricks walk into stores all the time carrying arms and none are tackled or accosted so why is "who is charged" an issue now!

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 07:50:05   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
From what I see if the black man was legal Then I'm on the side of the black man and I hope and expect the white dude be charged and prosecuted to fullest extent of the law

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 07:52:18   #
rkevin Loc: florida
 
PeterS wrote:
So you think who gets charged is the issue! White pricks walk into stores all the time carrying arms and none are tackled or accosted so why is "who is charged" an issue now!






Keep pullin' that "race" card, prick's, but chances are that the "WG," trying to save the [world] store, would have jumped on ANYONE carrying a gun. I go for a little imbalanced, not "r****t." Are you a "BG???"

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 08:11:00   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
PeterS wrote:
So you think who gets charged is the issue! White pricks walk into stores all the time carrying arms and none are tackled or accosted so why is "who is charged" an issue now!


Bulls**t! Prove it...r****t!

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 08:20:49   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
PeterS wrote:
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean., a black man, legally carrying a gun, is tackled because he (White Guy) thought the black guy was??? Well, just what did the WG think a 62 year old black man with a gun legally holstered was going to do? I know the fine, non-r****t, conservatives of OPP will see no bigotry here; after all, b****s have brought this on themselves right! But this reeks of bigotry if not down right good ole southern r****m! The thing is, this is a holstered weapon, not stuck inside the pocket of a hoody, carried by a gentleman of 62 years, not a thug of 16 years, so it crosses no ones mind that this guy is simply exercising his constitutional rights? Why is it, white males of the conservative variety, think the constitution belongs only to them; that they have a right to carry arms for their protection but others don't have the same right for the same reason? People are lucky that the guy didn't pull his gun and pop a few rounds into his attacker. Of course, then he would have had to argue "stand your ground" so he most likely would have wound up on Florida's death row!

This is a sick country getting sicker every day. Here is something else, there is a very good chance that the fine black gentleman of 62 years was one of the 3% of b****s who are conservative! Yep, he had a gun--because he had a permit to carry it you dumb fuk!

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/video-released-of-wal-mart-shopper-tackling-legal-gun-owner-video/
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean.... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I understand what your problem is, and it is sicker than the precious FEW in our nation who overreact to circumstances. I think that is what happened in this case. Out of millions of people ONE person overreacted, for wh**ever reason, and you have come totally unglued. Overreaction is not a national problem. Race baiters ARE a national problem because you FAR OUTNUMBER overreacters.

I believe the white guy in this case over-reacted, but I was not there, nor were you. I think another poster pointed that out to you. People who jump the gun and make up "facts" before anyone knows anything are the dangerous ones in this country. That white guy didn't know what was on the mind of the black guy and overreacted. So then YOU automatically overreacted - doing the exact same thing the white guy did. Neither of you bothered to THINK, and if there is a solid fact in this story it is that Americans, at least a few hundred of the millions REFUSE TO THINK and act out of sheer hatred and/or utter ignorance. To quote a movie line, "Assumption is the mother of ALL F***UPS. I agree with that line.

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 08:21:00   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
PeterS wrote:
So you think who gets charged is the issue! White pricks walk into stores all the time carrying arms and none are tackled or accosted so why is "who is charged" an issue now!


Black and white decent Americans walk into stores everyday openly carrying as is their Constitutional right. Many liberal sheep are bothered by this. Race has nothing to do with it. It could have easily been the other way around. It appears this white guy was an i***t. But there are plenty of i***ts of all races in America or Barry, the Liar in Chief would never have been elected. Comments like yours are the problem, not the solution.

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 08:28:56   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
Rufus wrote:
Black and white decent Americans walk into stores everyday openly carrying as is their Constitutional right. Many liberal sheep are bothered by this. Race has nothing to do with it. It could have easily been the other way around. It appears this white guy was an i***t. But there are plenty of i***ts of all races in America or Barry, the Liar in Chief would never have been elected. Comments like yours are the problem, not the solution.


Right on. I conceal carry wherever I go, but you won't see it.

BTW, the white guy was never charged because the black guy never pressed charges...and, the white guy apologized.

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 08:32:52   #
Rufus Loc: Deep South
 
JMHO wrote:
Right on. I conceal carry wherever I go, but you won't see it.

BTW, the white guy was never charged because the black guy never pressed charges...and, the white guy apologized.


Amen :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: That's the way real men handle things, so it is no longer an issue. The more guns law abiding Americans carry the less crime and the safer we all are.

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 08:49:08   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Rufus wrote:
Amen :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: That's the way real men handle things, so it is no longer an issue. The more guns law abiding Americans carry the less crime and the safer we all are.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amen, amen, and amen!!!! Too many males in our nation do not qualify as MEN, but do qualify as WIMPS.

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 09:02:27   #
Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon
 
PeterS wrote:
So you think who gets charged is the issue! White pricks walk into stores all the time carrying arms and none are tackled or accosted so why is "who is charged" an issue now!


12% of the population cause 70% of the crimes, take care of that then get back to us with your faux outrage.

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 09:06:22   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Your not much of a thinker are you, I'd say more of a race baiter than anything. Hell, I have a license and I wouldn't go to Walmart with a gun tucked under my shirt.


PeterS wrote:
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean., a black man, legally carrying a gun, is tackled because he (White Guy) thought the black guy was??? Well, just what did the WG think a 62 year old black man with a gun legally holstered was going to do? I know the fine, non-r****t, conservatives of OPP will see no bigotry here; after all, b****s have brought this on themselves right! But this reeks of bigotry if not down right good ole southern r****m! The thing is, this is a holstered weapon, not stuck inside the pocket of a hoody, carried by a gentleman of 62 years, not a thug of 16 years, so it crosses no ones mind that this guy is simply exercising his constitutional rights? Why is it, white males of the conservative variety, think the constitution belongs only to them; that they have a right to carry arms for their protection but others don't have the same right for the same reason? People are lucky that the guy didn't pull his gun and pop a few rounds into his attacker. Of course, then he would have had to argue "stand your ground" so he most likely would have wound up on Florida's death row!

This is a sick country getting sicker every day. Here is something else, there is a very good chance that the fine black gentleman of 62 years was one of the 3% of b****s who are conservative! Yep, he had a gun--because he had a permit to carry it you dumb fuk!

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/video-released-of-wal-mart-shopper-tackling-legal-gun-owner-video/
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean.... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 4, 2015 09:09:03   #
rocketride
 
I definitely see bigotry here. That goober is very lucky that the black man chose not to exercise his right of self defense using his legally carried gun.

And, yes, I am somewhere on the libertarian/conservative side of the chart. I always thought that the main thing wrong with the freedom riders was that they weren't 'running guns' to the black communities in the south in addition to the things they were doing. Klansmen getting nasty (lethal) surprises at attempted cross-burnings and lynchings would have been just the ticket.

That said, this incident was from the bigotry of one dimwit. These days, the organized bigotry is on the other side-- The Sharptons, Jacksons, Farrakhans and 0bamas, have some power in the American discourse, the neo-n**is and klan ideologies are almost universally reviled (and heartily laughed at*) in the white community.

BTW, the gun club of which I am an officer has been actively seeking to increase its 'minority' (meaning any human being who isn't a white male) membership. With considerable success.

* If there's anything the kind of s**theads who want to run other people's lives purely can't stand, it's being laughed at.

PeterS wrote:
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean., a black man, legally carrying a gun, is tackled because he (White Guy) thought the black guy was??? Well, just what did the WG think a 62 year old black man with a gun legally holstered was going to do? I know the fine, non-r****t, conservatives of OPP will see no bigotry here; after all, b****s have brought this on themselves right! But this reeks of bigotry if not down right good ole southern r****m! The thing is, this is a holstered weapon, not stuck inside the pocket of a hoody, carried by a gentleman of 62 years, not a thug of 16 years, so it crosses no ones mind that this guy is simply exercising his constitutional rights? Why is it, white males of the conservative variety, think the constitution belongs only to them; that they have a right to carry arms for their protection but others don't have the same right for the same reason? People are lucky that the guy didn't pull his gun and pop a few rounds into his attacker. Of course, then he would have had to argue "stand your ground" so he most likely would have wound up on Florida's death row!

This is a sick country getting sicker every day. Here is something else, there is a very good chance that the fine black gentleman of 62 years was one of the 3% of b****s who are conservative! Yep, he had a gun--because he had a permit to carry it you dumb fuk!

http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/21/video-released-of-wal-mart-shopper-tackling-legal-gun-owner-video/
I really thought this was satire at first. I mean.... (show quote)

Reply
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.