One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: permafrost
Page: <<prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 2870 next>>
Apr 30, 2024 22:00:56   #
AuntiE wrote:
Plus.


More...
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 21:34:46   #
AuntiE wrote:
You must show the following to her.


She will love it.. maybe hang it in the kitchen.. she does stuff like that..


Go to
Apr 30, 2024 21:19:47   #
AuntiE wrote:
You may tell her her cast iron sk**let club member is muttering about them as well!

If you have an Amish Market, check their bakery section. I can also recommend orange/cranberry muffins. At least, our market does a quite good job.


Will do... and she will be glad to know that she has company in her battle....
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 21:15:35   #
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
I believe this statement belongs to you.
"There was never an illegal server. Clinton was using a private server but it wasn't illegal. It wasn't even the first example. Colin Powell also used a private server. Since then, private servers have continued to be used, even Ivanka used a private server for official White House business.

The issue was whether or not the private server was used for t***smitting confidential information but the investigators couldn't find any. Yes, Clinton deleted a lot of e-mail but so does everyone else. It's not illegal to delete your old e-mail messages.

Most of your drivel is a waste of time, but occasionally the prevarications are just too egregious.

In the end, none of the courts or any of the numerous investigations that Republicans spent millions of tax dollars on found anything illegal. They gave her a slap on the hand for not being more careful but that's it. There's no proof that she actually t***smitted secrets."


I refer you to what James Comey, who, incidentally made several million dollars off his relationship with Hillary Clinton, actually said, rather than your typically arrogant dismissal, (sans proof as always) of any statement that disagrees with your presumed omnescience.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/james-comey-hillary-clinton-email/

You might also find what US law says about classified information.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798

https://www.archives.gov/guidance/classified-info-guidance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information_in_the_United_States
I believe this statement belongs to you. br i &q... (show quote)




try and keep it simple stupid..... KISS.....

This is the nuts and bolts of the statement 11 days before the v**e... No intent, No harm, No foul... no crime.. but it gave the e******n to that orange criminal.. we will pay for that disingenuous deed for decades or more..

https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system#:~:text=Now%20let%20me%20tell%20you,very%20sensitive%2C%20highly%20cla

Now let me tell you what we found: Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.Jul 5, 2016

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the ...
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 16:29:33   #
martsiva wrote:
Who said anything about changing laws? I sure didn`t. I agree that any of the scenarios you listed could have happened and an investigation is needed immediately starting with ones left in the house! I`m just waiting for more info on who was still firing from the house after this guy was dead. My guess would be the 17 year old unless somebody had somehow managed to escape out the back. Another guess would be that these shooters were tipped off the cops were coming to have that much fire power at hand. These are just my silly guesses.
Who said anything about changing laws? I sure didn... (show quote)


Not so silly... I tend to agree with the 17 year old as the prime candidate.... as for running out the back, even the most green participants would cover the back. I think... Of course as AuntiE pointed out they did not even wear armored vests.. so who knows.. I also want more info...
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 16:22:23   #
AuntiE wrote:
Speaking of, annd off topic, I may have to give up my morning banana. It seems they arrive with a whole swath of fruit flies.


maybe that is one reason for our shortage of banana nut bread.. a must have goody for the old guy who hangs around.. none of the good stuff for a long time and I think the MRS PF was muttering about flys now and again.. the bane of any banana bunch to be found... LOL
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 14:43:52   #
AuntiE wrote:
Has there been flies around, when I read the news, they could have been dinner as my mouth was agape at the news indicating they had no vests on.


Now that you have mentioned it.. seems more and more strange and hard to get a grip on being so unprepared...

Those darn flys,,,, always well fed...
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 14:33:55   #
AuntiE wrote:
T***hfully, the more important question is why the Marshalls and LEOs did not have their vests on!! We are talking about felony gun warrant. Somebody’s you know what best receive a written reprimand for such a major decision failure!!!!!!!


Yes, I would think that would be the first concern before starting the raid...
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 14:19:37   #
While violent crime is down across the country, that does not mean it is no longer a problem... the count shows personal crime is much lower as has been the pattern for decades.. but property crime is up.. sad to say..

this incident of course is not about property.. but focus must be applied to the part of the crime stats that show need.. K*****g of course is the top rung and demands action weather increasing or decreasing..
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 14:14:33   #
martsiva wrote:
TJMKO is a c*******t who wants the ATF to just confiscate firearms from law abiding citizens which she has stated more than once on this forum - just like c*******t do! She uses the tired worn out lie that less guns less deaths when in reality it would leave Americans defenseless against a tyrannical government and at the mercy of criminals who always have guns.


It seems to me that the issue has gone sideways...

What happened is that a convicted felon who did not have the right to posses a gun, had one.. that means that the existing law somehow did not get enforced. what we need is not yammering about changing any laws.. but rather find the reason the current law did not work. did a clerk overlook his felon status, did a buddy or other middle man buy the gun for him, did he steal the gun..

Each time this sort of k*****g happens, we fight over new laws or not... but most times it is not anything other than existing laws were not enforced.. It is far past time to put an end to that failure.. then perhaps it will become evident what if any new regulations should be put in place..

It is very clear for many years, something just naturally has to be done.. . Enforcement or new additional laws.

Or most probable, Both.
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 13:06:11   #
Rose42 wrote:
That bill doesn’t sound good. Surely there are other places they could mine that wouldn’t have such a devastating effect.


I truly hope so....
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 13:00:33   #
Exploiters have been intent on destruction of our environment for generations.. they never stop, this is once again an attempt to bring destruction not only to the Boundary Waters, and the national park, but also to the water table serving millions of people via the great lakes and the water shed in the Minnesota arrowhead.. The mining permit has been refused several times but the owners bring appeal again and again.. they want a verbal not written contract to stand, one look at the South American destruction they created and walked away from should be more than enough to put a final end to the exploitation they intend for the wilderness area and the great lakes watershed..


An abundant amount of clean water makes the Boundary Waters like no other place in the country!



But there is a dangerous new bill in Congress that could pollute our water and ruin this national treasure.



Right now, the Boundary Waters needs you.



Please contact your U.S. Representative and ask them to oppose H.R. 3195. Tell them to keep sulfide mining away from the Boundary Waters!



H.R. 3195 would overturn a 20-year ban on sulfide mining near the Boundary Waters. Specifically, it would reinstate mineral rights and leases to corporations like Twin Metals, which has proposed a copper-sulfide mine at the edge of the Boundary Waters. This would be a devastating setback for clean water and the Boundary Waters.



You can make a difference!

Please take a moment to email your U.S. Representative now and urge them to V**E NO on H.R. 3195!
Go to
Apr 30, 2024 08:35:49   #
straightUp wrote:
Yeah, I was noticing the back and forth on Trump's donations. According to his returns, he made contributions but he also fought hard not to disclose his taxes and Congress had to pretty much d**g it out of him. I suspect that in the meantime Trump was working with advisors to make his returns look more charitable.

On the other hand, he consumed tax money like a glutton. His family was still conducting the business (that he was supposed to divest from) and the SS was assigned to all their business trips and vacations because they also have to protect the family. Records show that the Trump family took 12 times more protected trips than the Obama family did PER YEAR!

Then add the fact that the Trumps often used their own resorts, forcing the security teams to rent rooms from the Trump family. So the government was effectively paying the Trump family just to protect them.

https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/trump-family-travel-12x-obama-family/

It's amazing to see people still supporting him... The only explanation I can think of is that they are blindly obsessed with distractions and prejudices.
Yeah, I was noticing the back and forth on Trump's... (show quote)


Go to
Apr 29, 2024 23:59:51   #
proud republican wrote:
Thsn these agitators should be arrested!!.. And according Columbia University they're trespassing because classes are over!@




I agree with the idea of arresting them.. but that does have some hang ups.. I am not sure if this applies to the current unrest... but back in the day... some who were arrested made a claim that University grounds were public so they had a right to be part of the happening.. they won, sued the city or university or someone.. do not recall the outcome, but it ended up with the non-students rejoining in the mob.. back in the ,,had to be 70s..

Have no idea how or if it would apply to the current demonstrations..
Go to
Apr 29, 2024 23:54:08   #
FallenOak wrote:
Recycling is not new. Soda pop used to come in glass bottles which cost a 2 cent deposit. The big bottles were a 5 cent deposit. I used to collect 5 soda pop bottles from along side of the road and trade them in for a dime and used the dime to buy a comic book. One of my buddy's save his returns until the had 50 cents, the cost a box of .22 ammo.
My thoughts on plastic is that it is a bane on society.


LOL.... I did the exact same thing as you did... your buddy was more forward thinking than I ever was..

It is to bad we gave up the deposit idea.. but looking back is alway easy...

Yes,, Plastic will be a heck of an item to get clear of..
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 2870 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.