AuntiE wrote:
To whom is your comment addressed?
It would be my guess that he is addressing it to you. :wink:
Okay, you have made your point and I did get too emotional over the thought of k*****g a child. It is my opinion and I should have been shorter. Point taken. I do not have any hostilities toward you but my saying that will not make you feel better. I hope that you find a way to deal with your animosity for me.
Searching wrote:
Well, might I remind "you" that I was responding to YOUR post to ME. It was not my intent to make this "personal" -- but to merely answer your query to me. However, WE can go there since I see you finished you comments with that veiled hostility that you are SO good at under the guise of civility. On second thought, "we" can't, but if the spirit moves you, please feel free.
I have no idea of what you are talking about. I agree with those to whom I agree. I give them feedback in the form of a thumbs up. For those that I disagree, and if I have data to support my position, I make comment. If I do not have the data, then I press on and do not leave feedback.
Is your conscious bothering you? Perhaps a visit to your priest or a good talk with a friend can help you sort out your difficulties.
Now a question, why on earth would I call you a name? Have you seen me address others in an uncivilized manner? I know that I have been firm in my position, but to call a person a name is not part of my disposition.
rumitoid wrote:
Too funny. Every opportunity, in your mind, to possibly score some points. Anyone who disagrees with me there you are with your numerous emoticons of favor. I truly h**e seeing people living in resentment, even you. I was wrong, you were right. I am evil, you are good. You are a far, far better person on our worst day than me on my best. Calling me "scum of the earth" would be like giving me a crown compared to my true nature. Does that work for you?
The time to think about birth control is before having sexual relations. A******ns are too frequently used as a means of birth control but the difference is the child is k**led, the heart is stopped and the baby is removed in sections. This to me is neither part of God's plan nor should it be acceptable to anyone. Regardless if you believe in God or not, compassion for an innocent life should make people think twice. Again, this is a product of poor parenting. A mother has to explain commitment that should accompany a sexual relationship. And in the case of modern mothers, they need to teach their daughters about birth control and the proper use. So often people encourage a******n, in particular if the expectant life is an inconvenience on the careless parents. If you wish to discuss the sin issue, I will be glad to go into that; but that would lengthen this comment beyond the patience of other people. What you have done is between you and your belief system. I am sure that you or he have done your best to make restitution, or at least justify your actions to be able to sleep at night.
The issue with gays, their "right" to marry was part of the original post and brought up a second time by the author. I simply provided feedback. If my opinion bothers you, I recommend you skim over my comments and not bother to stop and read. I will not change my beliefs for your comfort.
Regarding your reference to hell. That is a Christian belief. It is not applicable to me or my beliefs. I have never claimed to know God's thoughts, but I do know the laws that he provided us to live by. When I am judged, I know that I will not be spotless in God's eyes because I am human and have made mistakes. I have done my penitence and I move forward with the knowledge of what I did wrong and I do my best never to repeat the mistakes.
In my post about having gay friends, I am sure that I also wrote that in my home they do not spend the night together. I have no hatred for the individuals, I believe that a homosexual act is sinful. I can show understanding for t*********r people without endorsing, encouraging, or condoning the act of sexual indulgence in my home. We are taught not to turn a traveler, or a guest away but to offer food, sleeping arrangements, and clothing if they have a need. It would be helpful if you understood the traditions of my faith. But, you do not and I do not have the room in comments to teach you about hospitality and how to be a good host or guest. Please let me know if you need a list of recommended readings.
Searching wrote:
How did you miss the fact that he stated that he begged her not to have an a******n. I'm sorry, but that speaks to sorrow to me. What was he supposed to do, lock her in a room until she gave birth to a child she did not want, would not love? Now, bringing a child into the world that is unloved -- that's a true SIN. The fact that jimbino is all encompassing, seems to be what you are taking us BOTH to task over. I admit it is a cross some of us must bear, some of us pay a price for, a rather huge one from time to time, but you know what, it's a cross worth bearing.
As for your throwing in the comment that jimbino and I are staunch supporters of homosexuality, I puzzle why you should throw that into the middle of your comment about a******n first of all and second how might you come by that premise in the first place? Have you seen either of us interviewed by the media or pictures of us leading marches? Again, all I have seen from my fellow poster is an ability to embrace all of mankind, differences and all, being nonjudgmental and not trying as some do on this site to impose their way of life on others or who condemn those they deem "sinful" to an afterlife in hell. I'm glad "those" people don't have God's ear. If memory serves me, in another post you said you had people who were homosexuals spend the night at your house. Were you just acting in a civilized manner because that's what your Papa taught you or were you acting out of friendship? True friendship means accepting warts and all another individual.
I find it really interesting how some individuals claim to know God's thoughts. Wonder when it comes to judgment day, how God will look upon them.
How did you miss the fact that he stated that he b... (
show quote)
AuntiE wrote:
Their vociferous, denigrating and insulting attacks are, in fact, an attempt to shutdown any point except theirs.
You are very correct. I also noticed that when they are faced with direct questions they often deflect and go into the name calling.
saloopo wrote:
Emarine takes a selfie!
Still more handsome than Obama! To be honest, I would let Emarine come stay with us, but lock all my doors should Obama come knocking. At least with Emarine, there is no doubt where he stands. Obama, is the opposite........
Okay, I respect your right to have this opinion.
Brian Devon wrote:
There are very few c*******ts in America. C*******m at its core believes that the government should own the means of production.
Liberals/progressives, like President Obama, believe the means of production should remain in the private sector, but that there should be a social and medical safety net. Liberals are often akin to the social democrats found in Canada, U.K, and Western Europe.
The cold war is over. In case you are not aware the USSR died in 1992. The FBI stopped looking for c****es years ago and most Americans under 40 have no interest in reviving the paranoia of the 1950s. I suspect most of the v**ers in that age group have no idea of who McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover are. I guarantee you that the young do not provide many visitors to the CPUSA site. I suspect it is mostly visited by paranoid right-wingers, like yourself.
There are very few c*******ts in America. C*******... (
show quote)
lightfoot wrote:
Iam glad to hear that Snoopy ..However i got some unpleasant comments about OPERATION AMERICAN SPRING..So i figured that i was wasting my time on this site..
Do not let people force you to do anything! So ignore the ignorance, and press on. Their opinions are just that, their opinions! Your opinions are just as important as everyone else and do not allow ignorant remarks silence you.
Depends. We have lots of rules........But, we do like to ski and pay with toys such as dirt bikes, boats, snow boards, we also go fishing and camp out. We also have pets. So, you decide.
How can they not call this a h**e crime? How can they go further and say it was not the knock out game? What would the news be saying if roles were reversed? All white teenagers would be in jail, just because they might pay such a stupid game!
oldroy wrote:
He wants us all to think he is an old man but some here think he still lives with his parents. Yes he is hopeless about politics.
The pure progressives here want to believe that they aren't c*******ts but they are the same thing except that many of them are not dues paying members.
Well he could be still living at home. I have not thought about it, now I have to go and read all his posts and run it through a program we built to determine the mental age of writers. Results should be interesting.
Agree most with your second paragraph. As I said, they may not have signed a formal document, but the belief systems are consistent with c*******t philosophies. Not even socialist, but hard core c*******t! And should I be making a list................
emarine wrote:
Ok lets talk bunkers... how many have one or are in the process of building one? Now don't be shy speak up :thumbup:
No bunker, but I own an earthship. Solar with all of the trimmings. I had it built a few years ago, it is now used as a vacation spot for my family. It is pretty much isolated, self sustaining, with clean water. The place is rather small, only 4,000 sq ft, a greenhouse, pool, and 3 car garage. The majority of the house is inside of a mountain (natural cave) and it is quite bright inside. Not dim and dank. There is an entrance into the cave, we use it right now to store wine and such. Close enough to a bunker?
There are some useful things on this link, thank you. I went to the actual auction site and found things like utility trailers for hauling off road bikes, along with the things you mentioned.
saveamerica wrote:
I don't understand why Obama poll numbers are not lower, like 10% or 5% that's where they should be.
It is the way the questions are presented. I think the questions should be standardized and I think it should be computerized. In this way, the same question is presented to each person polled exactly the same way without voice inflections.
So the US Census is from the far right. And all the government sources are right wing. Gee, do they know that? admit it, you will not accept any information that might show fraud, in your political affiliations and your king.
WHO ARE YOU QUOTING AT THE END OF YOUR........comment? Name please, because I do not think that the quote is accurate.
Hungry Freaks wrote:
Purging v**er rolls is a matter of routine. And it's state law, not federal law (unless you want to count the Supreme Court decision halting Florida's 2000 recount.)
It would be nice for someone to give me some reliable source talking about anything approaching fair-to-middlin' v***r f***d. Most stories cut-and-pasted here are mostly from extreme right blogs that have to credibility.
I spent 11 years watching the process on the county level and another 8 watching it on the state level. It's not an easy system to game. there are safeguards, checks and plenty of access to observing the process for all sides.
I don't know why some people have a hard time accepting the fact that Barack Obama won the presidency fair and square-twice. And instead of taking an inward look at the shortcomings of the GOP's candidate, a segment of the far right fringe is convinced that 1-both e******ns were won only by "massive v***r f***d. and 2-Barack Obama wasn't born in the US and therefore is not a US citizens. This despite not an ounce of credible evidence to either charge, a minority of the right continues to believe what are basically fairytales.
I'm not going to say these folks ware mentally deficit as others have said of me. I'm just going to say they're wrong. And that they're tearing the country apart by continuing on this now-five year rant against the duly elected president of the United States.
And I'll make a prediction-no matter what Democrat gets elected to the White House in the future, the ultra-right fringe will continue on this attack mode regardless of what Democrat makes it into the White House. It was done on Carter to a very minor degree, fine-tuned with Bill Clinton and attacked in force with Barack Obama. Why rule when you can just rant about how bad the person with the job of president actually is?
They've got their game plan down. "Attack, attack attack. Don't let your opponent to be heard. Don't allow them to considered be human."
A quote from another far right fanatic who ended up on the wrong side of history.
Purging v**er rolls is a matter of routine. And it... (
show quote)