One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Fit2BTied
Page: <<prev 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ... 173 next>>
Nov 9, 2018 16:47:42   #
archie bunker wrote:
Ever had a lap dance from a necked midgit?

You mean like Billy Barty??
Go to
Nov 9, 2018 16:13:03   #
Lonewolf wrote:
China exports up 15% and they no longer need our soybeans or lobsters from main these markets took years to develop and won't return!
Trump's tariffs are k*****g our farmers and business all across the country!
And don't forget our automakers
And I believe this is exactly what he intended all along anything to hurt America
OK, this looks like your source
https://www.axios.com/china-lobster-soy-trade-war-8cd315a2-678a-4d0e-930a-03ca7b36ed16.html
But even in your article we find:
And the farming community has ways of seeking recourse, he says. Many American farmers stopped growing corn and wheat in favor of soybeans as the Chinese market grew, and they have the option of switching back.
Farmers are also protected by price floors on agricultural goods — a market advantage industrial workers don't have. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue tweeted: "The president has assured me he won't let our farmers bear the brunt of China's retaliation."

As for lobster, there will be other markets.

An article I found that showed similar points with a bit different slant.
https://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-is-boosting-exports-to-us-before-new-trade-war-tariffs-2018-11
The fact that China front-loaded exports in order to beat the next round of tariffs, makes me think your source is bending the facts a bit to suit a particular argument.

Maybe this next article will help flesh out the true picture.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-us-china-trade-war-results-imports-from-china-fall-2018-11.
Based on what happened to Chinese exports of the $30 billion in items covered by the initial round of tariffs, they were encouraged to pull out the stops to beat the next round affecting $200 billion in products. I'm not an expert at economics, but it seems that what is happening is what is to be expected.
Go to
Nov 9, 2018 13:00:03   #
archie bunker wrote:
I am tired of hearing about gerrymandering.
Both parties have, and do do it, but it only seems to become a major issue when democrats lose e******ns.
I would rather do away with parties, pacs, corporate money, media bias, and just have people, supported by people running on their own ideas, qualifications, and merits. A pipe dream, I know.
I go on what I observe, and experience in life, not what I'm told is true. And from my observations, and experiences, I truly believe that American politics, and possibly America herself is fkd.
It's the money, plain , and simple. And I see it worse from the left, who wants complete control. I don't know anyone on the right who wants to dictate, or censor speech, or thought. Or wants to tell you what your kids should be forced to learn at school, or what they can eat, say, do, or think to be accepted.
I'm damn sick, and tired of being told that I don't have American values, and that I'm not a patriotic American because I don't want your 30 year old boy who thinks he's a girl in the bathroom with my wife, daughter, or granddaughters, or that wetbacks bringing drugs across the border that can k**l the if they make a bad choice, or not believing everybody should get a trophy makes me against a strong America.

I am a Texan, and you "patriots" can kiss my ass if you think you can dictate to me what my values will be!!
I am tired of hearing about gerrymandering. br Bo... (show quote)
Caroll O'Conner could not have said it better, my Friend.
Go to
Nov 9, 2018 11:44:26   #
Trooper745 wrote:
Guns are k*****g an average of 96 people per day, and that includes suicides, justified shootings, etc. Democrats find that unacceptable????

On the other hand, about 125,000 murders of unborn babies are carried out by being torn apart with forceps, or having their heads crushed by forceps. Democrats find that completely acceptable!!!!!!

As long as someone is getting paid to murder humans, and might contribute some of that money to democrats to keep the laws that allow their getting paid big bucks for murder, .... democrats will fight for the right of doctors to k**l the innocent unborn humans for money, and thereby get some of the blood money for their next e******n. Hypocrites? Definitely!!!
Guns are k*****g an average of 96 people per day, ... (show quote)
You speak t***h Trooper745. Your 125,000 number came from somewhere, but it's actually much worse than what you cite. Or so says the CDC.

FBI Records (2012-2014 averaged) Show (per day)
Gun Suicides - nearly 58
Gun Homicides - about 32
Accidental Gun Death - about 1.5
Total Gun Deaths - about 90 per day

Babies Murdered - nearly 1790 per day (the CDC reported there were 652,639 legal a******ns in 2014).


https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/gun-deaths/
https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/data_stats/a******n.htm

We all know that a number of the a******ns may have been "necessary", but the lion's share were performed as a choice by the mother.

The absurdity of these numbers boggles the mind. By all means, progressives, let's argue about loss of innocent life!
Go to
Nov 9, 2018 11:20:06   #
PeterS wrote:
Well, the only thing I've heard from the right in terms of solutions is that everyone should carry guns and if you don't have a gun then you should charge the shooter--apparently, that was Fox's brilliant observation today. The problem with everyone packing is that there are simply too many nuts out there so putting a gun in their hand and have them look out for trouble is inviting trouble to happen. Now, suppose you don't ask everyone to carry a gun and it's just 'designated' individuals who will be armed--such as with our school system. So how do you establish uniform procedures to weed out the quacks from those who should be carrying a weapon without running the risk of putting a gun in the wrong person's hands who may well become the one causing the trouble and not protecting the children? And if luck holds and everyone who is carrying a gun checks out then the police are still going to have to weed out who is and isn't the shooter. So if nothing else, by having armed civilian you are slowing down the response time that the police and giving a shooter more time to k**l or to escape.

As for the second amendment--it was written because the founders saw one of the greatest dangers to our democracy a free standing army and a despots ability to use it against the citizenry. That was what King George used to suppress the colonialists which is why we were to have a system of states m*****a that could be called up by the governor at the first sign of danger but otherwise could present no danger to the citizenry. This is why they were to be well regulated because a system of m*****a governed by themselves might or might not come to the aid of their government when they were called. But you guys have pissed all over the meaning of the second amendment. Not only do you love a free standing army, you conservatives only complaint is that the military isn't large enough, big enough, or bad enough.

What you guys don't seem to understand though, and what the founders did, was that if there was no military to threaten you then no despot that could possibly suppress you. But we do have a free standing army, plus a US Marshal, the FBI, the ATF, HLS, the national guard, the state police, local police, and any number of private security organizations. Which begs the question of why you need military style weapons? It's not because of the constitution because you've surrendered the original function to the military. So what purpose do you have for military-style weapons--so you can pretend that you are protected from an Obama wannabe? That would seem so...
Well, the only thing I've heard from the right in ... (show quote)
It never ceases to amaze me how misinformed the anti-gun folks are. Just a couple of points.
- You spoke at length about "weeding out" those who should not have guns, which is sensible, but then you say "having armed civilian you are slowing down the response time that the police and giving a shooter more time to k**l or to escape". Think about things from the innocent target's point of view. Law enforcement response time is what it is. In that interim the active shooter is unimpeded. If a "good guy (or gal) with a gun" intervenes, the shooter will be forced to shift focus. So how many lives are saved from that time until the cops arrive? And if the shooter doesn't shift focus they do so at their own peril.
- Arguing about the meaning of the 2nd amendment with gun grabbers is a total waste of time, so I'm not going there.
- The biggest misinformation here is your "why you need military style weapons" rant. First off, you show you know nothing about the military (or firearms in general) and I can only imagine all the grimaces in the OPP veteran community when you say something as foolish as that. Style doesn't k**l anyone. "Fully semi-automatic" isn't a thing! The government very strictly regulates "military grade weapons", and that scary-looking, black, semi-automatic, rifle does not fit into that category - so get over it.
- I think those of us who own firearms would be willing to work with you for honest to God intelligent ways of keeping guns out of the hands of people without the mental capacity to properly handle them - but we'll never get to that point if you continue to spout such i***tic drivel. Got it? Good!
Go to
Nov 9, 2018 10:55:17   #
Kevyn wrote:
A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Bazookas, grenades, machine guns poison gas, nerve agents anti aircraft missiles and any other weapon no matter how deadly and unnecessary, shall not be infringed
As usual, Kevyn, you contribute such measured and logical thought. Bless your heart.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 20:00:01   #
nwtk2007 wrote:
All awesome! And Young Frankenstein!
oh it's twue, it's twue!
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 17:41:19   #
Pennylynn wrote:
I think there is much we could learn from this e******n. First, we are US Citizens and we v**ed.... our system works! Now it is time to pray for those elected, even if you did not v**e for them.... pray that Our Father will bless them with wisdom, patience, and they may find within themselves to do the right thing for us, the US citizens, that they become mute when they open their mouths to lie or abuse the position we entrusted to them. Pray also for our President so he can continue making our nation great.
I think there is much we could learn from this e**... (show quote)
Sanity...such a precious and scarce commodity. Hey, I don't regret praying for President Obama during his time in office.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 17:39:21   #
maximus wrote:
A quickie...not responding to anyone in particular.

Does anyone remember the movie Airplane. The bit where the two black men were trying to order their dinner and the stewardess couldn't understand the slang. Beaver's mom, Barbara Billingsly stepped in and said, 'I speak jive'. And proceeded to t***slate. Very funny hearing Beaver's mom speaking jive.
Anyway, I worked with hundreds of black people for about three years on my job, and was friends with a lot of them. When it was just them and me, one on one, I could understand them pretty well. But when one or two more b****s joined us, suddenly I could hardy understand a word. To me, that was their way of being 'kept' in the black race, of saying,'Yo, I is a black mayn.' Thing was, if they wanted to borrow money, I could understand them perfectly. LOL I still see some of them occasionally and I always get a hug from them.
A quickie...not responding to anyone in particular... (show quote)
Airplane. It's a classic - right up there with Blazing Saddles. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzIcec_bQss ... Barbara Billingsly "Chump don't want no help, chump don't get no help".
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 17:33:29   #
moldyoldy wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=21&v=V0n5jHqxT6g
Fu knee!
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 17:26:14   #
Weasel wrote:
SAD. But that's Hollywood.
We will see what Saturday Night Live Has To Say.
So I played a game where I took a drink every time someone on SNL bashed conservatives. The last thing I remember was someone hollered "It's Saturday Night!".
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 17:14:23   #
Seth wrote:
You mean, it will take years to run jobs back out of the country, put millions of people back on unemployment, utterly redestroy consumer confidence and make the border a veritable Autoban of foreigners racing into the country to drop anchor babies, sell narcotics, rape, steal, k**l, drain the social services system, create mayhem, steal jobs (under the table), sending more hundreds of millions of dollars out of our economy via remittance incomes to the "folks back home" and commit terrorist acts?

What patriots you people are. You should really be proud to call yourselves Americans with a straight face.
You mean, it will take years to run jobs back out ... (show quote)
Well stated, and you about covered it. I'd add putting us back on the pathway to losing our status as the preeminent military/national power able to face down any country or "Union" on the planet.


Go to
Nov 8, 2018 17:06:55   #
Capt-jack wrote:
http://www.visualcapitalist.com/animation-the-worlds-10-largest-economies-by-gdp-1960-today/

Animation: The World’s 10 Largest Economies by GDP

Here is a colorful visualization that breaks down the $80 trillion global economy.

While such a view provides useful context on the relative size of national economies, it’s also a static snapshot that doesn’t show any movement over time. In other words, we can see the size of any given economy today, but not how it got there.

Today’s animation comes to us from Jaime Albella and it charts how GDP has changed over the last 57 years for the world’s 10 largest economies.
It provides us with a lens through time, that helps show the rapid ascent of certain countries and the stagnation of others – and while there are many noteworthy changes that occur in the animation, the two most noticeable ones have been described as “economic miracles”.

Japan’s Economic Miracle

You may have heard of the “Japanese economic miracle”, a term that is used to describe the record-setting GDP growth in Japan between the end of World War II and the end of the Cold War.
Well, the above animation shows this event better than pretty much anything else.

In 1960, Japan had an economy that was only 10% of the size of the United States. But in just a decade, Japan would see sustained real GDP growth – often in the double digits each year – that allowed the country to rocket past both the United Kingdom and France to become the world’s second-largest economy.

It would hold this title consecutively between 1972 and 2010, until it was supplanted by another Asian economic miracle.

Economic Miracle, Part Deux

The other rapid ascent in this animation that can be obviously seen is that of China.
Despite falling off the top 10 list completely by 1980, new economic reforms in the 1980s and 1990s helped pave the way to the massive economy in China we know today, including the lifting of hundreds of millions of people out of extreme poverty.

By 1993, China was once again one of the world’s largest economies, just squeezing onto the above list.
By 2010 – just 17 years later – the country had surpassed titans like the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and even Japan to secure the second spot on the list, which it continues to hold today in nominal terms.

http://www.visualcapitalist.com/animation-the-worlds-10-largest-economies-by-gdp-1960-today/

http://www.visualcapitalist.com/80-trillion-world-economy-one-chart/
http://www.visualcapitalist.com/animation-the-worl... (show quote)
The animated one is fascinating, but requires you to watch several times to see how different countries have gone boom/bust. Japan vs China is indeed eye-opening.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 17:00:30   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Mueller already has a report ready to turn in, knowing what trump would try to do.
but his dog ate it. Dang!
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 16:57:58   #
proud republican wrote:
85 year old RBG is recovering in the hospital after she fell yesterday at work and broke 3 ribs.....She is doing ok this morning and should be back to work soon.......I think her time at Supreme Court is coming to an end....We WILL have another Conservative Justice next year.....Tic Toc...Tic Toc......I do wish her well though.....But it is time to retire,Justice Ginsburg....
What's hilarious is that I just saw this on Breitbart. It's amazing that the brain Hollywood keeps passing around among them hasn't burned out yet - or then again, maybe it has. For sure the "check engine light" has been on for awhile...


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ... 173 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.