One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: maximus
Page: <<prev 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ... 237 next>>
Jul 6, 2019 00:22:04   #
woodguru wrote:
Don't even go there on the concept of this being muslims, wealthy white men used to getting what they want are a huge part of the problem, its a problem, address it as such and leave the demographics of race and ethnicity out. If wealthy white men were treated like they should be there would be a boatload of them in prison.


Seems that you are the one throwing race around. Just 'cause it's against w****s doesn't make it not r****t.
Go to
Jul 6, 2019 00:18:36   #
Rose42 wrote:
Continued...

Call on your city councils, elected officials and police departments to make the battle against sex trafficking a top priority, more so even than the so-called war on terror and drugs and the militarization of law enforcement.

Stop prosecuting adults for victimless “crimes” such as growing lettuce in their front yard and focus on putting away the pimps and buyers who victimize these young women.

Finally, the police need to do a better job of training, identifying and responding to these issues; communities and social services need to do a better job of protecting runaways, who are the primary targets of traffickers; legislators need to pass legislation aimed at prosecuting traffickers and “johns,” the buyers who drive the demand for sex s***es; and hotels need to stop enabling these traffickers, by providing them with rooms and cover for their dirty deeds.

That so many women and children continue to be victimized, brutalized and treated like human cargo is due to three things: one, a consumer demand that is increasingly lucrative for everyone involved—except the victims; two, a level of corruption so invasive on both a local and international scale that there is little hope of working through established channels for change; and three, an eerie silence from individuals who fail to speak out against such atrocities.

But the t***h is that we are all guilty of contributing to this human suffering. The traffickers are guilty. The consumers are guilty. The corrupt law enforcement officials are guilty. The women’s groups who do nothing are guilty. The foreign peacekeepers and aid workers who contribute to the demand for sex s***es are guilty. Most of all, every individual who does not raise a hue and cry over the atrocities being committed against women and children in almost every nation around the globe—including the United States—is guilty.

https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_essence_of_evil_sex_with_children_has_become_big_business_in_america?fbclid=IwAR2N-YGrqNBX91M0ULXiiMQ25lr6tIKg2uGOhOU6cLvfC2T9qyK1lkBxUOA
Continued... br br Call on your city councils, el... (show quote)



Along with everything else you recommended, we need to pray nightly for all of these helpless children. As for the traffickers....no mercy...k**l every one of them.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 23:59:08   #
kemmer wrote:
Trump isn't light years ahead of Howdy Doody.


Then why can't all of you intelligently superior dems catch Trump at anything? I don't p[lay the insult game but I'll tell you this...the dems are inferior, NOT superior. Evidence, not me, says this quite loudly.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 23:48:47   #
kemmer wrote:
That’s a pile of horsepuckey. And God has absolutely nothing to do with Trump or his actions. His supporting evangelicals are prostituting themselves by giving him pass after pass.


God said that whoever befriended Israel would be blessed. Trump...israel...America doing great...duh!
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 23:35:25   #
factnotfiction wrote:
The pseudo "economist" and father of "trickle-down", now wants the fed to be controlled by the administration. what a dunce, but he is potatoheads main guy.

And the potatohead march to trumpism/c*******m continues


http://www.newsmax.com/politics/arthurlaffer-economist-medaloffreedom/2019/06/30/id/922693/


So, what are you complaining about? Did you pay attention to the part where Powell raised rates to slow Trump's exploding economy? I'll ask the question since you didn't..Do ya' think that Powell did that JUST to make Trump look bad? Probably so.
Do ya' think the media is biased for not televising something as newsworthy as the 4thy of July celebration at the Lincoln Memorial? Trump never one time took credit for anything, he gave it all to the people he recognized and to all of the branches of the military. Did ya' ever think the tanks and the planes were for Kim Jong Un's benefit? Trump was just there ya know....
In fact, what were you even thinking when you posted this?
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 14:03:40   #
son of witless wrote:
It is easy for a Conservative like me to just condemn out of hand these two debates. Everyone on stage is an insult to everything I believe in, but after listening to the Liberal commentators I decided to try to look at it from a Liberal's viewpoint. You might think it to be impossible, but it is in reality easy.

So what are the candidates seeking to accomplish ? Well they are in actuality not very different from a bunch of puppies in a pet store. They are all competing to see who will get adopted. They were all barking, yelping, trying to look cuter than the other mutts, and also trying to figure what qualities their new owners might be seeking. In the end only one puppy can go home with the family. The rest will go back to the puppy mills.

So I think there are two qualities they are all trying to show. First they must prove they are the biggest Left wing Santa Claus on the stage. If it's free, it's for me, was the first theme. Free Health care, free college, free money. Free, free, free.

Now for the second quality the pups need to sell. The ability to fight. Democrats believe that Hillary lost to Donald J. Trump because he bullied her on stage and she being such a nice girl did not fight back strong enough. In this quality Kamala Harris seems to have come up larger than life because of the way she viciously attacked poor old Joe Biden. Poor Joe, poor old old Joe did not have a good anwser. Like an ancient canine warrior, he was left in bloody tatters by this faster, meaner young wipper snapper.

While my money is still on Senator Warren who thinks she is Native American, Kamala Harris might just be the fighter the Democrats believe they need to go up on stage and kick Donald Trump in the groin and win back the White House. Warren can only get so far with her class warfare schtick. Bernie is still the crabby " get off my lawn " old guy and just doesn't have the juice anymore.

None of the other four legged friends stood out to me. They were all just background noise.
It is easy for a Conservative like me to just cond... (show quote)



What I took away was that they insulted every English speaking citizen in America. The rest of their garbage I already knew.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 11:22:04   #
no propaganda please wrote:
by Dr. Leonard Sax

Distrust of authority is now the American norm. In 1964, 77 percent of Americans said that they trusted the government to do the right thing most of the time or all of the time. In 2012, only 22 percent of Americans agreed that the government could be trusted. When I was growing up in the 1960s, if a priest came into a crowded restaurant, he was often ushered to the front of the line. If you watch a press conference with President Eisenhower or President Kennedy, you will be struck by the respect and deference shown by reporters in that era, quite different from what President Trump now routinely encounters, and Barack Obama, and George W. Bush before him.

In the Ohio public schools I attended, it was customary for students to address teachers as “Sir” and “Ma’am.” If a teacher accused a child of wrongdoing, the parents typically accepted the teacher’s verdict without question and were likely to impose a punishment at home more severe than any imposed by the school. Today, if a teacher accuses a child of wrongdoing, the parents are likely to swoop in like attorneys, demanding evidence and mounting a defense.

This mistrust of authority, and the corresponding unwillingness to exercise authority, now pervades almost every sphere of American life, including the home. As recently as forty years ago, most American parents told their kids how to dress, what to eat, how to behave. Today, American parents typically ask. The very notion of commanding rather than asking seems old-fashioned or just downright wrong.

I am a practicing physician. I earned my medical degree from the University of Pennsylvania, graduating in 1986. Over the past three decades, in more than 90,000 office visits, I have seen children, teenagers, and their parents from a wide variety of backgrounds and circumstances. I have observed, from the intimate yet objective perspective of the family physician, profound changes in American life over the years. I have witnessed firsthand the collapse of parenting.

For example: A mother and father recently brought their six-year-old daughter to see me. The child had a fever and a sore throat. I examined the ears, which were fine. I said, “Next I’m going to take a look at your throat.” But before I could proceed, mom asked, “Do you mind if the doctor looks in your throat for just a second, honey? Afterward we’ll go and get some ice cream.”

This mother thought she was doing the right thing, being sensitive and caring, but her intervention derailed the visit. The little girl paused and then burst into tears, wailing, “I don’t want to!” What should have been a two-second exam became an ordeal lasting several minutes, requiring an assistant to restrain the child. The mother’s goal may have been to ease the girl’s discomfort, but in fact she made it worse.

Don’t negotiate with a six-year-old - that’s my rule. In a quarter century of clinical practice, I have learned that the key to effective examination of a sick child is simply to do the exam. If a child has a fever and a sore throat, then I’m going to do a Strep test. The child doesn’t get a v**e. Here, the mother burdened the child with the illusion that the child had a decision to make. Her intervention changed my command into a negotiable request and turned the negotiation into a bribe.

The authority of the grownups was undermined. When asked “Do you mind if the doctor looks in your throat?,” the six-year-old heard a bona fide question, and the answer to the question was I do mind and I won’t let him. This sort of episode just did not occur when I began my medical career thirty years ago.

Why are we now so uncomfortable with the notion of authority? Part of the answer, I think, lies in the infiltration of political sensibilities into family relationships. Politically, the story of the past fifty years can be summarized as the empowerment of the previously disenfranchised. People of color were promised equal rights under the law. Women gained wider ­access to the workplace and protection from overt sexism. Institutionalized discrimination was lifted, public accommodations were opened to all, women poured into universities, and welfare programs were expanded.

The concepts of hierarchy and authority ­became suspect, politically incorrect. Nobody stopped to say: “Yes, it is right that women, people of color, etc., should have equal rights relative to white males. But what is true for adults in their relations with other adults may not be true for parents in their relations with children.” Empower everybody! Why not ­children, too?

Because the first job of the parent is to teach the children, not to consult them. When the doctor says that you have to get a Strep test, then you get a Strep test. You have to eat your vegetables before you eat dessert. School is a place to learn, not a fashion show or a social club, and you must dress and behave accordingly. These are essential lessons.

Parents must also teach their children right from wrong. No child is born knowing right from wrong. Children have to be taught the difference, which means (in this context) accepting instruction as authoritative t***h. And authoritative teaching requires authority.

When parents abdicate their authority, they set their children adrift. Kids need firm guidance. When their parents don’t provide it, they look to peers or social media or the Internet. What they find is Miley Cyrus, Justin Bieber, Akon, Eminem, Nicki Minaj, Kim Kardashian, and Lady Gaga. It’s a confusing mélange of sex, selfies, and the endless striving for popularity and attention. What really counts in that world is who’s sexy and who has the most followers on Twitter and the best photos on Instagram.

Legitimate authority establishes a stable moral universe for children. It provides an alternative to the popular culture that has become a culture of disrespect: disrespect for parents, for teachers, for one another. This culture of disrespect leads young people even to disrespect themselves: hence the growing propensity of American teens to post photos on social media of themselves in various states of undress.

This new norm—the casual obscenity of sexting—would have been unthinkable even twenty years ago. “Everybody does it” is what kids tell me, with a shrug. “It’s no big deal.” Without clear adult authority to guide them, they live in an unstable moral universe in which everything is relative, in which self-worth is contingent on the opinions of same-age peers.

American parents are vaguely aware of these problems, but they usually blame surface culprits: Too much sugar in the diet. Too much time online. Too many video games. Too little sleep. Those factors, important as they are, nevertheless are symptoms of a bigger and deeper problem, which is: We’re raising our children wrong. Parents don’t exercise authority, and so they allow their young to absorb the ambient American culture of disrespect. Instead of instructing kids in the Golden Rule, parents ask their kids, “How would you feel if someone did that to you?” And parents don’t know what to say when their son answers, “If someone did that to me, I’d kick him in the nuts.”

Diana Baumrind, a psychologist, has been studying parenting in the United States for more than forty years now. She has found that the most effective parents, as measured by long-term outcomes, are those who are both strict and loving. She has also found that many of today’s parents don’t understand that pairing. They don’t believe that “strict” and “loving” can go together. They think you can be either strict or loving, but not both. They opt for loving and shirk their duty to be strict.

The results are not good. Children are more likely to become defiant and disrespectful. And that’s not healthy. Children who are defiant and disrespectful are three times more likely to become obese compared with the children of authoritative parents. The children of permissive parents are more likely to c***t in school. They are less resilient and more fragile. To fail to be strict, to refrain from exercising parental authority, turns out to be a most unloving thing for a parent to do.

Over my three decades as an American physician, I have been involved professionally in a handful of cases of sexual assault, each with a girl or young woman as the victim. In one instance, as I sat with the mother after the fact, she said, “I knew I shouldn’t have let her go. She’s just fifteen years old. It was a party at the college. I knew I shouldn’t have let her go.”

One part of me wanted to shake her and yell, “Then why did you let her go?” But of course I didn’t do that. I already knew the answer. This mom wanted her daughter to like her. She didn’t want her daughter to be upset with her. She was uncomfortable exercising parental authority.

I am not suggesting a return to the 1950s. Every era has its shortcomings. But we need to recognize that the collapse of American parenting has had unhappy consequences for American kids.

What to do? I have several recommendations, based on my observations of healthy families. Here are a few:

In scheduling your child’s time, make the family the highest priority. In many American families, playdates and soccer practice now routinely take precedence over the family meal together. The family meal at home is more important than piling on afterschool and social activities.

Participate in a church or synagogue that teaches respect for authority.

Model a culture of respect within the home.

Instead of boosting self-esteem, teach humility. Fight the contemporary cultural imperative to be “awesome.”

Reduce or eliminate screens when you are with your child. Put your cell phone away. No devices at the dinner table. Teach the art of face-to-face conversation.

If you follow this tack, your neighbors or your child may not consider you to be a “nice” parent. But we now know that the children of “nice” American parents are more likely to grow up anxious and depressed, to be more fragile, less healthy, less creative, and more disrespectful compared with the children of authoritative parents. There’s nothing nice about that.

Fifty years ago, Americans trusted the public schools, the government, and the president to an extent that seems naive to us today. Every era has its flaws and injustices. But one element of that now long-past culture of authority needs to be recovered. Children must accept the authority of their parents, and parents must humbly assert and exercise that authority - for the sake of their children.

Leonard Sax is a practicing physician and the author of The Collapse of Parenting.
by Dr. Leonard Sax br br Distrust of authority is... (show quote)



You are so correct! Parents are supposed to be the boss, not the negotiator.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 11:13:43   #
factnotfiction wrote:
potatohead is deaf and dumb when it comes to Americans who need healthcare.

Wonder if any potatohead supporters will join that caravan


Please see my post to the originator of this thread.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 11:09:44   #
factnotfiction wrote:
Thanks to the complete ineptitude of potatohead and his brainless conservative republican in the senate and house, the usual trump lies about controlling medical costs are once again proven to be just that...lies.

No wonder democrats are making significant gains promoting a medicare for all plan.

Why is potatohead and conservatives so against American citizens with severe, chronic medical conditions?
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-160523-1.html
Greed



http://www.politicususa.com/2019/06/29/canada-invaded-by-caravan-of-desperate-americans-looking-for-cheap-insulin.html
Thanks to the complete ineptitude of potatohead an... (show quote)




I think it's because the Democrats are trying to win the next e******n because there is no way to pay for the free health care they promise. But I DO agree that medicines cost too much in America. My wife has a terminal disease and MUST have 2 infusions each week for the rest of her life to live. One costs $5,000 each month, and the other is $18,000 each month. That's $23,000 for just 2 medicines...EVERY MONTH! However, in the UK where healthcare is universal, these medicines are not paid for and the people who had the same disease have died or will die.
My wife has a severe, chronic, and terminal medical condition, but IS able to live in this country but would die in the UK. If fact, she would already be dead. With these 2 medicines, she may be able to live a normal lifespan.
So, how do you justify saying that the president is against people with severe chronic medical conditions?
Canada has the same problems.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 10:54:44   #
Airforceone wrote:
Your just in denial.

She came here to this country illegally and posses nude and you love her. Your ignorance and hypocrisy is clear. Keep reading the daily caller Tucker Carlson (F**E NEWS)


Hillary got a man off who raped a 12 year old girl and laughed about it, and you love her. Which is worse?
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 10:49:21   #
Kevyn wrote:
I posted published photographs of Melania Trump and this site removed them because they deemed them to be pornographic. It is difficult to get your head around the fact that the presidents wife posed nude for lesbian pornography and yet is heralded by people who claim to be conservative Christians.


Kevyn, it's so surprising that you support and celebrate men dressing like women, having breast implants, men having sex with men, women having sex with women, and every kind of sexual deviation, and yet you don't see Melania as a modern liberated first lady, bravely posing nude in a repressive Republican society. It's a bit disappointing.
Quote:
people who claim to be conservative Christians
are forgiving. People who claim to be forgiving Democrats are not.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 10:38:29   #
Gatsby wrote:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shoot%20the%20bull

Is "Shooting the Bull" an impeachable offense?


According to Democrats...yes. But then, according to Democrats, ANYTHING that Trump does is an impeachable offense. To them, just that he got elected is automatically an impeachable offense.
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 10:34:23   #
kemmer wrote:
I am a believer and follower of Jesus and his teachings. At the same time I do not believe good people who do not believe or know the Christian message have forfeited what Christ has promised.


kemmer,
Good morning. Your statement brings several questions to mind. Jesus died for our sins, so if there's any other way to get to heaven, then why did he die? You said "good people", so why does the Bible say in
Romans 3:23 King James Version (KJV) 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Can being a good person and doing good things override this verse Ephesians 2:9 “Not of works, lest any man should boast.” ?
Keep in mind, Jesus said in John 14:6 “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the t***h, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” This statement rules out being good, being baptised, speaking in tongues, good works, or anything else besides Jesus.
As for people that don't know the Christian way, if you believe the Bible, everybody today came from 2 people, and then later from 8 (after the flood). That is to say that at 2 different times, everybody on earth knew God. That the message got lost is man's fault, not God's.
Please know that I am not getting on to you and that I say these things with love in my heart.
Have a beautiful day!
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 01:08:05   #
2bltap wrote:
With the PLAN! Short video of what personally believe.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/NGuyUyRBsA4


Excellent!!!
Go to
Jul 5, 2019 01:00:57   #
bmac32 wrote:
Depending on the source, either 15 million or 18 million people watched the first Democrat debate. It had to be a spectacle. It’s not that often that we get too see so many rascals together, outside of Congress, with each of them pretending they are better than the others. In reality, there’s no reason for a Democrat debate because there’s no real difference between any of the Democrats. They all h**e America, and they are all pushing the same socialist agenda.
Democrats want all minorities to feel like victims, dependent on their Democrat masters

In fact, all Democrats hide behind a humanitarian mask and promise handouts from the public treasury. They are promising things like Medicare for all, free medical care for i*****l a***ns, guaranteed income and even r********ns for s***ery. As for r********ns, the word r********n carries the connotation of victim with it, and Democrats want all minorities to feel like victims, dependent on their Democrat masters.

Moreover, it’s difficult for Democrats to sustain a permanent underclass of victimized v**ers when most Americans are gainfully employed and enjoying the fruits of their labor. People are once again prospering from manufacturing jobs; jobs that, according to Obama and the Democrats, were never coming back. In response to candidate Trump’s promise to bring manufacturing jobs back to America, Obama made the condescending remark: “What’s he going to do, wave a magic wand?”

In reality, the Democrats didn’t want manufacturing jobs to come back because prosperity comes with good paying jobs and prosperity is detrimental to the Democrat’s c*******t agenda. Democrats will promise anything to regain power and put an end to prosperity because they know that it’s impossible to lead independent and prosperous people into socialist servitude.
Socialist utopia that Democrats envision for America

In addition, Democrat handouts are like deals with the devil because they all come with a hitch, a pitfall. For example, to receive government healthcare (Obamacare), we had to forfeit the freedom to choose our own coverage and healthcare provider. We had to give up control of our own healthcare. If we refused to pay for expensive healthcare coverage that we didn’t need, we were forced to pay fines and penalties. That’s another way to steal the fruits of an individual’s labor—through fines and penalties called taxes.

In fact, Obamacare was designed to steal the fruits of labor of one group, give to another, and lead all into state dependence, or as it was once called, s***ery. It’s s***ery to steal the fruits of labor of certain groups of people to redistribute to others. Justifying theft by calling it taxes doesn’t change the fact that it’s stealing. By the same token, calling servitude socialism doesn’t change the fact that it’s s***ery. Changing the word that describes the condition doesn’t change the condition. The best example of the socialist utopia that Democrats envision for America comes from the old south.

In the old south, Democrat plantation masters provided their s***es with food, clothing, housing and medical care. In return, the master stole the fruits of the s***e’s labor and used it as he saw fit. Does that sound familiar to anyone? S***es didn’t have the best of anything, but what they had was free. However, s***es paid a high price for everything the master provided through hard labor and the loss of freedom, liberty and independence.


S***ery and c*******m are exactly the same

Furthermore, s***es didn’t have to worry about anything except freedom, liberty and independence - everything else was provided by their Democrat masters. S***es couldn’t quit the plantation if they were unhappy, and they couldn’t improve their economic position or station in life no matter what they did. The master owned them and the fruits of their labor, and that’s the same system the Democrats want to create again, except this time, they want all races, not just b****s, under their tyrannical system of s***ery known as c*******m.

As a matter of fact, the Democrat’s cradle to grave utopia is no different from the old s***e plantations. The Democrat’s will once again steal the fruits of the people’s labor through exorbitant taxes and then use the stolen money as they see fit - just like the old plantation masters did. It’s s***ery just like it was back then, but it’s on a much larger scale, and it’s now disguised as humanitarianism. All the people have to do is surrender the fruits of their labor, give up their freedom, independence and liberty, and the Democrat party will provide them with basic subsistence from the cradle to the grave.

Finally, s***ery and c*******m are exactly the same. All we have to do is replace the plantation with the state and the master with the party to get the Democrat’s new c*******t utopia. It’s a system of s***ery disguised as humanitarianism, but make no mistake, what the Democrat socialists are really offering is state s***ery. In other words, what the Democrats are really promising the people is a s***e’s lifestyle because their promises require the masses to give up the fruits of their labor, as well as their freedom, liberty and independence. It’s another deal with the devils that we know as Democrats.
Depending on the source, either 15 million or 18 m... (show quote)




This is a well written and t***hful statement. It's one of the best I've seen in a while. Good work.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 ... 237 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.