How was it an excuse it was true she didn't listen to experenice. Being smart isn't a indication of good judgement. Judgement is gathered by a number of items that person goes through.

Right the ethics part is not included in the reasons for impreachment. But when your performance is questioned what do you think is used to gauge your preformance? There is a certain expectation of your actions which is lead by a set of rules which is called ethics. The polls say good but the polls aren't involved here. The reason it took so long for the impeachment to start was because of the polls , the public was not ready for impeachment.The only thing that the public is able to effect are the seats in congress. The Dems were concerned that a repeat of Clinton's impeachment was going to happen if they pushed for impeachment. If the public was not ready, as it stands now the public is tired of the whole thing. In regards to polls you can quote any one you want someone can come up with one that says different.

Have to disagree, maybe bad judgement if she had listened to experience instead of feel good judgement she could have won. Bill told her she had to fight for the smaller states and not coast on feel good judgement. Can't verify the next just remember a v**er who v**ed Trump who stated that she knew he was lying to her but just the fact that he was listening help her make the decsion. Ether way whenever you v**e you usually v**e for the promise not just the person.

Dosen't have to be proven to the point of law , impeachment is not criminal but based on Ethics all it has to be done is convince the persons in the Senate that it has happened and let the persons decide whether the articles have been committed.It is more of a debate then a trial.

He maybe trying to do what JFK did with the Green Beret. The legend states that JFK asked a select few to help the country if the military were ever used against civilians.

Well if you consider the statement that he has made about his staying in office. Even if they are made in jest. By giving the pardon he will get some of the military to support him and disregard the chain of command because they are seen to be unimportant.

H****r B***n was paid for the use of his name , his fame came from his father being the vice president. As long as you have name recognition that is the only requirement. Example you have Trebek who hosts Jeopardy, he's helping sell insurance , does he know anything about insurance? The stories that are around about Trump you can say the same about him. People have him just as rotten. About his money being dirty that is matter of opinion. The Bursima thing, the investigation was before H****r was hired. Yes he may have been involved but very unlikely the investigation was in 2012 he was hired 2014.

New York post and cnn reported on the twentyeighth the closest I've seen.

Well who had control while Obama was in office? Apparently no one really cared what Obama did while he was in office. Of course congress on both sides weren't really doing their expected job. Since he is no longer in office congress won't be able to do anything anywhy. Reports have gone out that spy gate doesn’t exist. On H****r B***n the results came out he didn’t do anything.

What is baloney? That people who have name recognition won't sell the use of their name. Trump does it the only difference is Trump sold his name in an area that he has experience in.While H****r did in an area he doesn't. Which is questionable but not illegal.

Last statement I heard that the removal isn't going to happen because 20 reps were needed , also with the massive spins people are getting tired of the drama. So the people have slowly lost intrest. So the dems have lowered their sights and are willing for censure. So it has to pass in the house for censure to happen. One thing you can say for sure the dems found something it was figured that it was worth the chance. True or not it was more for ethical standards.

The sense is there, but if it does go into the trial phase the statement made about the witnesses is a double edged sword. The subpoena's will also open up the chance to bring others to the table. Which will lead to possible damage to both sides. As for the Republicans in the house they can try to v**e on approval of the articles, all it would require is a simple majority. If it was planned that the whole show was to be cancelled the majority may not be there. Either way it was going to be easlier to get the articles approved then get a removal because of the Senate being controlled by the Republicans.

It was a program that showed a CIA, secret agent actions in real time. Each episode was a hour long and on the hour. Prior episode started at 6 am played until 7 am the following episode started at 7 am to 8 am and so on until the 24 hours period ended. Which was if I remember correctly was the complete story of the episode. Unless it was a continued story line.

What the link leads to is a stage performance. There has been at least one other attempt at singing the song by someone other then the actor.This is not part of the movie.

For the same reason that the Republicans had closed hearing on B******i.
There was possible sensitive infomation being discussed, two
according to the house rules that were approved by the Republicans when they changed the subpoena requirements in 2015. This below came from page 18 of the House Rules document when Republicans v**ed a change to subpoena requirements. Pease note what is in parentheses. All meetings other than committee on Ethics are to be in the open. Since the impeachment is based on presumed ethical practices the meetings can be held in private. Then the other option for closed meeting is when the infomation that comes out may endanger national security, would compromise sensitive law enforcement information, would tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person, or otherwise would violate a law or rule of the House.

Open meetings and hearings
(g)(1) Each meeting for the t***saction of business, including the mark-
up of legislation, by a standing committee or subcommittee thereof (other
than the Committee on Ethics or its subcommittees) shall be open to the
public, including to radio, television, and still photography coverage, except
when the committee or subcommittee, in open session and with a majority
present, determines by record v**e that all or part of the remainder of the
meeting on that day shall be in executive session because disclosure of mat-
ters to be considered would endanger national security, would compromise
sensitive law enforcement information, would tend to defame, degrade, or in-
criminate any person, or otherwise would violate a law or rule of the
House. Persons, other than members of the committee and such noncommittee Members, Delegates, Resident Commis-
sioner, congressional staff, or departmental representatives as the com-
mittee may authorize, may not be present at a business or markup ses-
sion that is held in executive session. This subparagraph does not apply to
open committee hearings, which are governed by clause 4(a)(1) of rule X or
by subparagraph (2). (2)(A) Each hearing conducted by a committee or subcommittee (other than the Committee on Ethics or its
subcommittees) shall be open to the public, including to radio, television,
and still photography coverage, except when the committee or subcommittee, in open session and with a majority present, determines by record v**e that all or part of the remainder of that hearing on that day shall be closed to the public because disclosure sensitive law enforcement information, or would violate a clause
clause 2(k)(5); or
(ii) agree to close the hearing as
provided in clause 2(k)(5).
(C)