One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: acknowledgeurma
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 77 next>>
Aug 5, 2019 18:43:52   #
woodguru wrote:
You don't have a clue what socialism is except the right wing rhetorical way it's being used

You might find informative, Richard D. Wolff's 3 Basic Kinds of Socialism:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7x7oVwhHok
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 18:37:23   #
Fit2BTied wrote:
The NYC Police Commissioner at the time, Bernard Kerik, would refute a lot of that article, but wh**ever. Since you're using that bastion of t***hiness, Politifact, it must be the t***h #sarc.

Do you mean the felon Bernard Kerik?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Kerik
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 15:59:49   #
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
Chinese are thieves. They had been stealing our Intellectual Properties for years. China has encroached all over the Pacific and have built military base at the Spratly Islands that they don't own. Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and others own these islands.

China's trade war with US. China devalued their yuan currency so low, so that they manipulate trades with all other countries. Their biggest market is the US.

Therefore values of their exports to US and other countries are so low that will attract foreign buyer to buy more of their exports. On the other hand US exports get higher so that will minimize our sales to China and others. This will hurt our economy.

I am not sure how else to rectify this problem at the moment. Stocks are doing down so much right now.
My investments go down also.
=============== br Chinese are thieves. They had b... (show quote)

Some might say these are the results of China's embrace of Capitalism.
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 15:50:05   #
byronglimish wrote:
And unfortunately, some minorities are degraded by Democratic's into believing they can't be self supporting.

In the form of phony handouts. The whole Democratic socialist s**m is for control of the citizens.

Richard D. Wolff has some interesting things to say about "3 Basic Kinds of Socialism":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7x7oVwhHok
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 15:45:51   #
America 1 wrote:
"The USA Is So Slanted Towards Liberals"

They prefer someone that kisses ass rather than kicking ass.

So you would prefer your ass kicked over kissed?
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 15:44:05   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
We really haven't been able to trust the media since the '80s. I have a partial list that Nixon gave Walter Cronkite is on t along with a few other deceased ones. One of my buds thinks we've found the underbelly of the nwo these are all p*******es. The media's bald-faced lying started this year, it kind of makes sense in a perverse way. After all we are in a civil war with no shots fired, the left refuses to accept Trump. That is what is called a civil war. So we may as well get rid of the s*******s Congress.
We really haven't been able to trust the media sin... (show quote)

If you think criticizing someone you don't agree with is "war", then what would you call shooting and k*****g? [Sexist Remark Warning] Is your uterus disordered?
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 15:35:23   #
Blade_Runner wrote:
What the hell is wrong with that? There are a lot of Trump defenders in this country. And there are a lot of subhuman assholes who attack him. In America a man or a woman has the God given right to defend themselves and anyone else, including the POTUS, against the assaults of the devil.

And what would you recommend be done with the "lot of subhuman assholes"?
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 15:22:29   #
son of witless wrote:
C*******ts generally use force and oppression to control their fellow citizens and keep power. The problem is, as the Soviets found out, over the long term you simply cannot match your Capitalist competitors. Stalin used force and murder to get what he could out of his s***es. His successors by not being as blood thirsty gradually got less and less. Whenever leaders like Khrushchev and Gorbachev tried to reform C*******m their efforts only made it even less efficient because they could not ever go far enough in allowing the incentives for the people to want to produce more.

China was the only C*******t nation to figure out a way to allow capitalistic reforms in and still maintain political control. Somehow the Chinese reformers were not blocked by the bureaucratic power centers that always frustrated Soviet reformers. However, the Chinese model requires high economic growth. There has to be at least the perception of the Chinese people improving economically. If they have a prolonged period of stagnation, their only fallback is harsh repression.

They can get away with Repression with isolated regions that have minorities like the Uyghurs who can be isolated. They are trying to wipe out the cultural identity of the Uyghurs and make them thoroughly Chinese. They have many in detention camps.

My point is that China would prefer using prosperity to govern rather that naked force. China is described as very strong, but brittle. There are divisions within the C*******t Party. If they use force because they have a period of low growth, then cracks in their facade of control will form. They also have a potential rival political class that North Korea does not have to worry about. They have a rich entrepreneurial group who might become active.

When the Soviet Union collapsed there was a small group of Oligarchs who eventually Putin had to crush. The Chinese C*******t Party has to be aware that it has that same problem, only much bigger.
C*******ts generally use force and oppression to c... (show quote)

Richard D. Wolff has an interesting video: Rise and Fall of the USSR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Y-TWFKw4tU

In the last minute, he describes a fundamental difference between the USSR and the PRC (i.e., the USSR was not able to cut the deals with the West that the PRC did.

Wolff also has an interesting video: 3 Basic Kinds of Socialism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7x7oVwhHok
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 12:35:21   #
proud republican wrote:
As horrible as it sounds,i think they are...because in their minds it shows how evil President Trump is and in the words of Kevyn needs to be removed...This is just mine opinion...

So let's ask the question, "Are Republicans secretly happy to find out that the Dayton shooter (Connor Betts) was a registered Democrat who "On a Twitter account believed to be registered to Betts, he described himself as a l*****t, anime fan, and metalhead, with posts that opposed Donald Trump and supported Elizabeth Warren, gun control and socialism"?

For quote, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Dayton_shooting
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 12:29:26   #
Rose42 wrote:
We are all sickened by what happened. The father of lies is working hard and there is only one way this can all be stopped.

Well don't keep us in suspense. What is the one way?
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 00:53:38   #
emarine wrote:
I think a little manual labor never hurt anyone... carrying your own golf bag is like basic training for spoon fed plutocrats who inherited wealth like trump... how can you champion the working man if you never had to work hard your entire life... America needs a working President that has crapped over the rail or in the wild not gold toilets... man EmilyD talk about a pawn of the plutocracy ...

I can testify that even a little manual labor can hurt someone if someone is not wearing proper safety gear.

emarine's "how can you champion the working man if you never had to work hard your entire life" seems to imply that the only way one can become a champion for an other is to have been the other. Is this really true?
Go to
Aug 5, 2019 00:27:34   #
byronglimish wrote:
"You people"...You people who are trying to stir racial hatred in America..thats who foo!

Just how am I trying to stir racial hatred in America?
Go to
Aug 4, 2019 23:09:21   #
DogLover99 wrote:
It's all Trumps fault, right?????????

Although President Trump might disagree, I don't think he is God.
Go to
Aug 4, 2019 22:59:18   #
Crayons wrote:
I know where you're goin with this, But Cornhead has been a thorn in our side
for almost 2o years...His emails are now flowin nonstop on a daily basis...a fast sign of desperation


Go to
Aug 4, 2019 22:55:32   #
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
Without Hongkong, the economic policy of China could not compete with president Trump. China has 1.4 billion people to take care of.

The British took over Hongkong in 1898 with a lease for 99 years under Queen Victoria. British had made Hongkong prosperous with democratic controlled under capitalism.

GDP of US in 2018 was $20.5 trillion versus China was $14.2 trillion.

President Trump impost a 10% tariff to China imports worth about $300 billion.
Chinese retaliated to impost 25% tariffs to US imports about $16 billion.

US depends so much on cheap quality Chinese products, made by Chinese cheap labor. I think US must discipline ourselves buy our own which is more durable and better quality though a little bit more expensive due to our higher standards and high labor cost.

In 1997, the British PM Margaret Thatcher, signed and ended the 99-year lease. Hongkong was ceded back to China, with the condition that Hongkong remains democratically controlled governance under capitalism for 50 years.

The return of Hongkong to China made China prosperous and gradually got world dominance in commerce in the Far East. It used to be Japan was the main country that controlled economic dominance in the Far East.

The people in Hongkong have been used to democratic control via the Parliamentary system of England.
That has slowly changed, and the mainland China is beginning to take away that freedom, thus people of Hongkong resist. They want more freedom away from the mainland.

Hongkong has a 426 miles of territory and the most densely populated and economically independent in all parts of the world. Hongkong is now revolting against the mainland for power control. The people of Hongkong grew up in freedom under the British rule.
I hope the people of Hongkong continue to live freely under capitalism to pursue its destiny.

https://www.thoughtco.com/china-lease-hong-kong-to-britain-195153
=============== br Without Hongkong, the economic ... (show quote)

I think it is a stretch to say Hong Kong was democratically controlled under the British. It was only after Chris Patten became governor in 1992 that he made moves to democratize Hong Kong. See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_development_in_Hong_Kong
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 77 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.