The only way to take back your country (any country) begins and ends with reclaiming your own hometown by running your own candidates for mayors, councillors and school board trustees in the very next e******n.

It’s an idea for a Counter Revolution, whose time came a long time ago but has been virtually ignored until now.

It is not at the federal level of government where the shift to socialism can be stopped in its tracks, but at the largely ignored civic or municipal level.
.

Progressives are in the process of turning America into a socialist state in E******n 2020. Towns and cities—long ago hijacked by the United Nations Agenda 21/2030—have already completed the process and are now owned lock, stock and barrel by the UN without their citizens even being aware of it.

Although it’s now a worldwide trend, the list of ICLEI-controlled cities in the U.S. and Canada is stupendous. here

“You can’t fight City Hall and Win"has been drilled into the public conscience for decades, making it seem that everything proclaimed by fat-cat Mayor Butter-pants is inevitable. But you CAN fight City Hall and Win by v****g them out of office and replacing them in the very next local e******n.

While the mayor is out cutting ribbons,or catching catnaps during council meetings, you can be out there papering the ‘hood. getting the message out to friends and neighbors.

It’s easier than you think because not only v**ers but the mainstream and social media tend to ignore most civic e******ns.

Municipal governments include thousands of wayward school boards, which are responsible for setting policies that indoctrinate rather than educate children in taxpayer-subsidized public schools, where now male perverts have full access to girls’ washrooms.

E******n statistics prove that apathy gets most mayors, councillors and school board trustees elected, many of them already well schooled in Saul Aliinsky-style Social Engineering.

Mayors of the present day only end up in headlines when they are outrageous (New York’s City’s C*******t-crazed Mayor Bill de Blasio) or the creators of gargantuan publicity stunts (London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s ‘Baby Trump’ Balloon).

Most other mayors, seen as ribbon-cutters at new bank and restaurant openings, are either totally ignored or ridiculed as vexatious but harmless clowns and goofs.

Long lost from public view is that the mayors often make the stink bombs—later thrown at the masses by members of senior level of governments.

Remember, It is mayors elected by public apathy who get away with declaring cities “sanctuary cities"and not the feds.

Here’s the latest sign of city mayors at work:

‘Mayors of major US cities say they will not cooperate with planned ICE raids of i*****l a***ns’
—(The Blaze, June 22, 2019)

“Several leaders of major U.S. cities have reacted to reports of planned Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, and they say they will not cooperate with the federal action.

“Mark Morgan, the acting director of ICE, told reporters that the raids would target families that have received a deportation order.

“If you’re here illegally, then you should be removed,” he said. “And in this case, that includes families.”

“Some mayors are responding to the report with anger and int***sigence.

Chicago

“Chicago’s Mayor Lori Lightfoot said that she had cancelled access to ICE of their police databases, and sounded off to the department about her opposition to the raids.

“I have also personally spoken with ICE leadership in Chicago and voiced my strong objection to any such raids,” Lightfoot said.

“Further, I reiterated that CPD will not cooperate with or facilitate any ICE enforcement actions,” she added.



Los Angeles

“Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti made no distinction between legal and i*****l i*******ts in his statement that rejected the planned raids.

“Los Angeles will always stand with our immigrant brothers and sisters, and our law enforcement officers will never participate in these actions,” Garcetti said. “No Angeleno should ever have to fear being snatched from their home or separated from their loved ones—and we are doing everything we can to provide immigrant families with the information and support they need.”

Houston

“Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner released a statement citing the “rich cultural contributions” of immigrants to his city.

“The city does not try to do ICE’s job, nor does it try to impede ICE,” he added.

“Turner, however, noted that ICE had not notified Houston of increased ICE activity in the same way they had other cities.

“It doesn’t what your ethnicity is, your religion, whether your (sic) documented or undocumented,” Turner added. “If you’re in the city of Houston, I’m your mayor.”



“ICE is expected to target 2,000 families in ten cities including Miami, Houston, Los Angeles and Chicago.

“The president tweeted on Monday about the raids.

“Next week ICE will begin the process of removing the millions of i*****l a***ns who have illicitly found their way into the United States,” he said.

Here’s a report about the impending ICE raids:

ICE set to begin immigration raids in 10 cities www.youtube.com

Only honest townsfolk and city dwellers can turn back the socialist tide.

But they can’t wait “to get the UN out of America and America out of the UN”, which has turned out to be all talk and no action.

The UN wants all cities and towns populated with “global citizens"when their populations see themselves as ordinary patriotic citizens.

Townsfolk and the citizens of cities can turn the table on encroaching socialism and take their country back.

Look up the dates of your next municipal e******n and get out and run against your mayor, council members and school board trustees.

If you don’t win this time, get out and take them on a second time, and keep running against them until you take over their seats.

Start the Counter Revolution that will take your country back and start it today.

Is Anyone else Homo-Nauseous?
By Dave Daubenmire - June 22, 2019

Author note: This commentary was originally written in 2007. Last week I attended the homo parade in Columbus, Ohio and felt it was appropriate to republish it. These d*****ts are on the verge of ruling America.

Warning: Commentary is not politically correct.

I’m s**k of it. I really am.

I’m not homo-phobic. I’m not homo-h**eful. I’m not homo-latent. I’m homo-nauseous. I really couldn’t care less where a man desires to put his sexual appendage.

But I’m s**k of hearing about it. I’m s**k of talking about it. I’m s**k of it being force fed to me on TV.

Check out these pictures.

In all of my life I have never seen such deviancy so openly celebrated. They are d*****t, you know? No matter how many names they will try and call me, no matter how many sensitivity classes they try and send me to, no matter how much tolerance they try and cram down my throat (sorry), the fact remains homosexuals are d*****t.

D*****t—One that differs from a norm, especially a person whose behavior and attitudes differ from accepted social standards.

Homosexual behavior is a d*****t lifestyle. Everyone knows that. So in order to make themselves look normal the homosexual movement is doing everything that it can to change social standards. They can’t feel good about themselves, so they must make sure WE feel good about them.

Well, I’m s**k of it. I’m homo-nauseous. The homo-sexual movement is making me sick.

I understand what I am opening up myself to. It happens every time I take on this subject. My emails will be flooded by those who are concerned that I must secretly be battling homo-feelings, that I need to get-over my homo-phobia, and that Jesus would not be so judgmental. And that is just from the Christians. You couldn’t stomach what the sodomites say about me. Hey, I’m used to it. It comes with the turf.

But I thought the homosexuals were just like everyone else and that all they wanted was to be free to live their lives in peace. If that is the case, why won’t they stop identifying themselves by what they do in the privacy of their bedroom? Why are they so intent on making me accept their deviancy? Why are they trying to indoctrinate 6-year-olds into their perversion?

I’m s**k of it. Take your behavior into your house and leave us alone.

They’re everywhere, these norm changers. They are perverted. (I’m sure that makes all of you nervous as well.) But interestingly enough, perverted shows up in the dictionary as a synonym for d*****t.

Perversion—a person whose behavior deviates from what is acceptable especially in sexual behavior.

That is straight out of the dictionary. It is not a right-wing, fundamentalist version of the word. It is what the word “perverted” means. The homosexual lives a d*****t, perverted lifestyle. The dictionary says so. Don’t blame me. Words have meaning.

Here is what their godfather Alfred Kinsey wrote:

“Perversions are defined as unnatural acts, acts contrary to nature, bestial, abominable, and detestable. Such laws are interpretable only in accordance with the ancient tradition of the English common law which … is committed to the doctrine that no sexual activity is justifiable unless its objective is procreation.“ [A.C. Kinsey, et.al., “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,” 1948]
Their behavior and actions are perverted and d*****t. Go ahead, call me h**eful. I’m only defining the words. What they do can never be normal,so they must change the meaning of normal. They must alter societal standards.

Have you been watching?

They take their lifestyleï to the streets to celebrateï their debauchery (which I suppose is a harsh word too unless you read the definition.) Excessive indulgence in sensual pleasures; intemperance.

Look at these pictures (Warning: Graphic debauchery. May make you homo-nauseous) of the normal gay lifestyle.

Their behavior is costing billions in medical care.

Look at this educational material they are force-feeding public-school kids. They attack anyone who disagrees with their debauchery. Remember, they must change societal standards to accept their debaucherous, perverted, d*****t, lifestyle. They can’t change their behavior so they must force you to change yours.

The government promotes it. The schools promote it. TV and films are awash with homo-stars. Churches are embracing it.

Homosexual activists are the real f*****ts. They are determined to control what you think, believe, and say. They h**e free speech. They will do all they can to silence men like me.

Well, I’m s**k of it. Leave me alone. Leave our children alone, leave our schools alone, and leave our culture alone.

What is wrong with the Church? Can’t they see what is happening to America? Can’t they see what is happening to our children? Can’t they see that the rug is being pulled out from under them?

Isaiah 1:4 Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward.
Why should ye be stricken any more? ye will revolt more and more: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint.
From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores: they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with ointment.
Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as o*******wn by strangers.
And the daughter of Zion is left as a cottage in a vineyard, as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a besieged city.
Except the LORD of hosts had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been as Sodom, and we should have been like unto Gomorrah.
…but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores. Putrifying refers to the decay of the body of a formerly living organism into simpler forms of matter.

America is dying. It makes me sick. It is time to stand up and fight against this deviancy.

Is anyone else homo-nauseous?

Oregon's Gov. Kate Brown (D.) instructed the state police Thursday afternoon to round up Republican state senators who fled the state capitol in anticipation of a v**e on cap-and-trade legislation they oppose.

"The Senate Democrats have requested the assistance of the Oregon State Police to bring back their colleagues to finish the work they committed to push forward for Oregonians," Brown said in a statement. "As the executive of the agency, I am authorizing the State Police to fulfill the Senate Democrats' request."

Democrats have an 18-member majority in the state Senate but need 20 of the 30 members present to have a quorum to v**e on legislation, hence their need for Republican members to be present to pass the legislation. The bill passed the state House earlier in the week with all Republicans and two Democrats v****g against it.

Reports indicate some Republican senators have left the state to avoid v****g on the legislation, which would raise utility costs and taxes on gasoline and diesel.


"Protesting cap-and-trade by walking out today represents our constituency and exactly how we should be doing our job," Senate Republican Leader Herman Baertschiger Jr. said in a statement early Thursday morning defending his caucus's decision to protest the v**e.

"We have endured threats of arrest, fines, and pulling community project funds from the governor, Senate president, and majority leader. We will not stand by and be bullied by the majority party any longer," he added.

Earlier in the week, Baertschiger noted the legislation would disproportionately affect rural Oregonians who travel farther distances than their urban counterparts and generally operate less fuel-efficient vehicles than those in urban or suburban areas.

"It is fundamentally inequitable to put the responsibility of cleaning up their pollution on the backs of rural Oregonians," he said.

It boggles my mind when I learn about programs and benefits that non-citizens get from our various forms of government that is not available to US citizens. Here is another example. Why should an employer get a tax subsidy from the US Government for hiring a foreign graduate from a US University, but not a US graduate? Doesn't tax preference for a foreign graduate equate to discrimination against US graduates?

Washington, D.C. (June 18, 2019) - The Center for Immigration Studies finds that two big newspapers, the New York Times and the San Jose Mercury, recently published articles on the controversial Optional Practical Training (OPT) program for foreign grads of U.S. universities without mentioning the t***h about the program — America's elderly and sick in effect pay $2 billion a year to employers who hire alien grads through OPT rather than American ones.

View the full post: https://cis.org/North/New-York-Times-San-Jose-MercuryNews-Hide-Subsidies-Alien-Grads-OPT-Articles

David North, fellow at the Center and the author of the piece, said, "Neither article mentioned the approximately 8 percent tax break that employers of foreign grads, but not of American grads, get under OPT. The program's dirty little secret is that it is subsidizing employers who choose to hire alien grads rather than American ones."

The New York Times article on Monday dealt with a slowdown within the Department of Homeland Security in the issuance of work permits for the foreign alumni bore this awkward headline: "Visa Delays at Backlogged Immigration Service Strand International Students".

The Times article focused on the new delays in the issuance of work permits for these jobs, which, indirectly, caused the loss of some of those jobs, and on an interesting set of "victims", all of whom are former or current students at Ivy League universities. This gives a lopsided view of the program that routinely provides subsidized jobs to more than 200,000 alumni of less highly regarded institutions.

For instance, one would not know from reading any of the rare media coverage of this program that OPT alumni have been hired, in subsidized jobs, as construction laborers.

Meanwhile, The San Jose Mercury News reported on an important event in the migration business - Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) will soon be introducing a bill terminating the OPT program; he has also written to the president urging him to end the program (which has no legislative basis) by issuing an executive order.

Gosar is aware of the subsidies in the program, and is opposed to them. The first report on his legislative proposal came from Bloomberg News, which also noted the subsidy element in OPT, but the Mercury-News account failed to mention the tax break.

That these trust funds are, in effect, sending money to employers who would rather hire alien graduates than American ones, remains, for all practical purposes, a dirty little secret.

Marguerite Telford
Director of Communications, Center for Immigration Studies
(202) 466-8185
mrt@cis.org

Former Vice President Joe Biden told a journalist in 1974 that “cruddy politicians” like himself could “take away” the First Amendment if they wanted.

The current 2020 Democrat frontrunner made the comments to Washingtonian magazine while being interviewed for a profile published in June 1974. Biden, then only 31-years-old, came to regret the interview, as his penchant for gaffes and insensitive remarks—traits defining later portions of his career—heavily colored the piece. At the time, however, Biden appeared eager to discuss his life as the nation’s youngest senator.

“I am proud to be a politician,” Biden told then-Washingtonian writer Kitty Kelley, who authored the profile. “There is no other walk of life which can do more good for mankind than politics. It influences everything that happens to the American people.”

Biden proceeded, according to Kelley, to lean “over his desk to shake his finger at me” while explaining elected officials like himself had the power to “take away” constitutionally protected rights if they saw fit.

“And, whether you like it or not, young lady,” he said. “Us cruddy politicians can take away that First Amendment of yours if we want to.”

Biden’s remarks to Washingtonian mirror those he made in an address to the City Club of Cleveland, Ohio in May 1973. Although that speech initially drew notice for comments Biden made likely to be offensive to women and his use of racially insensitive language —notably when he lectured about what “was good for the Negro,”– it also provided insight into his views on power and politics.

“We spend a lot of time talking about the United States being a melting pot, well that’s true, but quite frankly I think it’s overrated,” Biden told the City Club. “We’ve been able to move forward because of politics. In my opinion, politics need not necessarily be a dirty word.”

Biden expressed that despite the conventional feeling politics was “dirty,” politicians like him do more good for society than doctors or lawyers or “Indian chiefs.”

“Politics should be the most honorable of professions,” he said. “Those of you who are doctors and lawyers and Indian chiefs in the audience, how can any of you possibly do as much good, if you are very good at what you do, as I can do if I am very good at what I can do?”

‘You can’t,” Biden added. “So the point is, this is where the action is.”

[just the kind of men we want for President.]

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/10/joe-biden-1974-politicians-can-take-away-first-amendment-if-we-want/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20190610

Once again we had another mass shooting involving a semi-automatic weapon. So what's the solution? Well, we can start by banning the weapon of choice--the semi-automatic weapon. Do that, and we at least give people a chance. And notice, I am not saying ban all guns just the ones responsible for all the mass slayings. This leaves bolt actions, pumps, and revolvers to satisfy our second amendment requirement--all of which are better than when the second amendment was written.

This leaves the question of how we enforce such a law and as I stated before--a fine of 10,000 and a couple of years in jail will lend to them being turned in in droves. Of course, the most radical right wing nuts will hold out but there is no argument that outweighs the common good of our country and that's what it comes down to...the common good.

Pregnant Rep. Sets Pro-A******n Lawmakers Straight in Emotional Speech from Chamber Floor
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/watch-pregnant-rep-sets-pro-a******n-lawmakers-straight-emotional-speech-chamber-floor/?ff_source=push&ff_medium=conservativetribune&ff_campaign=pushtraffic&ff_content=2019-05-31

At the moment, it seems like there are two kinds of states: those that are trying to protect the unborn and those who want to remove literally any protection whatsoever.

In the latter category, few states are going quite so far as Illinois.

Illinois’ new a******n law passed the state House 64-50, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. The v**e came after a contentious debate, however, including a question over how far the new bill went.

Advertisement - story continues below


The Sun-Times said the Reproductive Health Act “would repeal the state’s current a******n law, adopted in 1975. In its place would be language in which certain elements are removed, such as: spousal consent; criminal penalties for doctors who perform a******ns; waiting periods; and other restrictions on facilities where a******ns are performed. The updated legislation, which passed a House committee on Sunday, also clarifies the definitions of viability and health.

“A new provision says a******ns can be performed after viability only if necessary to protect the health or life of the pregnant woman,” they said. “It also defines the viability as the fetus having a significant likelihood of survival outside the uterus without extraordinary medical measures.”

TRENDING: Bill O’Reilly Cuts Alyssa Milano Down to Size After Smug ‘F-Lister’ Comment

The bill’s sponsor, Democratic state Rep. Kelly Cassidy, said that criticism that the bill would allow a pregnancy to be terminated at any point was “medically and factually incorrect.”

However, the key Republican in the debate — Rep. Avery Bourne, who is pregnant herself — questioned Cassidy on key issues, like what a “fundamental right” to parental notification involved and what an “extraordinary medical measure” was.
In a passionate speech opposing the bill, Bourne made it clear this wasn’t just a minor redefinition of a******n law but something that could allow “perfectly healthy” babies to be aborted at any stage.

“This bill will mean that if a baby requires extraordinary medical measures after they’re born, doctors could determine up to the 40th week of pregnancy that that baby was never viable because it had to be flown to the NICU after it was born,” Bourne said.
“This bill means that if the baby is viable, a doctor can determine that the post-viable a******n can still take place based on a number of factors that include familial health and the age of the women.”

Watch her emotional speech below:
https://youtu.be/fKPfd_Sm734