It's usually/generally said that infinitesimal evidence may be found - but not enough to alter the outcomes.

Yea, yea, Heritage foundation can't be trusted. As the following excerpt from that particular link explains...

"The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has been monitoring e******n f***d cases state by state. E******n f***d covers a range of activities — such as registering someone to v**e and forging their signature, filling out an absentee b****t for someone who has died or moved away, v****g while ineligible, or pretending to be someone else at the polling place and v****g. They find that there have been 1,465 proven cases of e******n f***d — 1,264 of these resulted in criminal prosecutions and the remainder resulted in civil prosecutions, diversion programs, judicial findings, or official findings.

These may sound like big numbers, however, they must be examined in context. The findings encompass more than a decade of data during which, nationally, hundreds of millions of v**es have been cast. For instance, in Texas, Heritage found 103 cases of confirmed e******n f***d. However, those 103 ranged from 2005 to 2022 during which time over 107 million b****ts were cast. There were 11 million b****ts cast in the 2020 p**********l e******n alone. The fraud in Texas amounted to 0.000096% of all b****ts cast — hardly evidence of a fundamentally corrupt system."

https://www.google.com/search?q=kimberlyzapata&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS1017US1017&oq=kimberlyzapata&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBggAEEUYOzIGCAAQRRg7Mg8IARAuGA0YgwEYsQMYgAQyBggCEEUYQDIJCAMQABgNGIAEMgkIBBAAGA0YgAQyCggFEAAYCBgNGB7SAQkxODExN2owajSoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Zapata will pay the penalty for her crime. But.....

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/widespread-e******n-f***d-claims-by-republicans-dont-match-the-evidence/

[quote=AuntiE] .....it is about policy, not personality.

Policies, eh

https://www.epi.org/publication/50-reasons/

Excerpt..."President Trump has said he would ‘protect’ and ‘fight for’ workers. Instead, his administration has systematically done the opposite."

The Economic Policy Institute is a 501 non-profit American think tank based in Washington, D.C., that carries out economic research and analyzes the economic impact of policies and proposals.

https://www.cato.org/commentary/grading-trumps-economic-policies

Excerpt...."For the last four (Trump) years, formal U.S. economic policy has all too often resulted from frantic, messy attempts by beleaguered government officials to 'backfill' disconnected policy trenches dug by p**********l tweets. That’s no way to run economic policy, and it shows."

The Cato Institute is an American libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 1977 by Ed Crane, Murray Rothbard, and Charles Koch, chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Koch Industries.

Actually, we all get along just fine. In 2020, my yard had 'Biden/Harris' signs and a few of my neighbors had Trump signs. We had no problems.

Nobody has signs up yet for 2024.

I have not heard of any assassination talk and would be unequivocally opposed to such.

President Abraham Lincoln once said, “The b****t is stronger than the bullet." This is a very significant quote because it helps us realize how important our v**e really is. I believe he was also quoted as saying that "b****ts are the rightful and peaceful successors to bullets". Sadly, John Wilkes Booth thought otherwise, and the nation suffered as a result.

Again, I agree with the rail-splitter.

You're welcome Most of my days are damn good

What you state above is obvious only in some people's minds.

“It's easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.” - Mark Twain

I'm quite sure Twain knew that all would/could take this same attitude towards others.

One thing is certain: I wish no harm or bad things to happen to anybody opposing my political position(s). That pertains especially to members of my Family or friends who happen to support Trump. C'est la vie: To each their own.

Think so, huh

https://www.npr.org/2022/03/07/1084510375/ag-bill-barr-book-trump-2024

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/14/us/politics/mike-pompeo-president-2024.html

Come on, LT...I knew you'd cover that slant.

Could you give us a list of Biden administrative officials that want The President out

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2021/10/14/military-bases-swung-hard-away-from-republicans-in-2020

On the other hand, anybody reading the thread title and OP could only picture TFG as Donald Trump. What does that say about your reading comprehension and thinking sk**ls, Dear Lady

Better call 911

Or, play Nurse Nancy.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-administration-endorsements-mike-pence-b2514445.html

The easiest way to assess what support may have been lost by Trump and Biden over the past four years might be to look at the people who worked for them in the White House. The people that were right there as they governed, who saw first hand how well they did the job.

We know that Mike Pence isn’t supporting Trump. That’s the Vice President.

Bill Barr, Trump’s Attorney General - not supporting Trump.

John Bolton, Trump’s National Security Advisor - not supporting Trump.

General McMaster, Trump’s other National Security Advisor - not supporting Trump.

Mark Esper, Trump’s Defense Secretary - not supporting Trump.

General Mattis, Trump’s other Defense Secretary - not supporting Trump.

Tom Bossert, Trump’s Homeland Security Advisor - not supporting Trump.

Miles Taylor, DHS Chief of Staff - not supporting Trump.

Rex Tillerson, Trump’s Secretary of State - not supporting Trump.

Mike Pompeo, Trump’s other Secretary of State - not supporting Trump.

Ty Cobb, Trump’s White House lawyer - not supporting Trump.

Alex Azar, Trump’s Secretary of Health - not supporting Trump.

General Kelly, Trump’s Chief of Staff - not supporting Trump.

Betsy DeVos, Trump’s Secretary of Education - supported DeSantis.

Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s other Chief of Staff - not supporting Trump.

General Milley, Trump’s Chairman of the Joint Chiefs - not supporting Trump.

Dan Coats, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence - Not supporting Trump

Trump’s Press Secretaries, Sarah Matthews and Stephanie Grisham, and his Communications Directors Anthony Scaramucci and Alyssa Farah Griffin - not supporting Trump.

In fact, out of 44 people asked, who served in Trump’s cabinet, just 4 have endorsed him. 90% of them are not supporting Trump for re-e******n.

If you find any members of Biden’s cabinet that do not support his re-e******n, let us all know know. Because as far as I know, there aren’t any.

Maybe somebody could explain why any ordinary America v**er would support Donald Trump’s re-e******n bid when most of the people who served in his last government job won't.

Did you not read the title or the article in the thread to which you responded