One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: stymie
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 42 next>>
Aug 4, 2014 13:34:58   #
Alicia wrote:
*********************
stymie (interesting name - do you live up to it)?

I never fall for anything hook, line and/or sinker. and I also do not base my decision/opinion on just one article. Isn't it nice of you to admit that there are "some" t***hs in this article. These t***hs coincide with other literature I've read as well as my own observations. You've admitted that at least "some" of the references are, in fact true. What leads you to believe your mind works better than mine? Evidently you feel the need to talk down to someone not having the same political outlook as yourself. I believe that shows insecurity.
********************* br stymie (interesting name ... (show quote)


You have again made a decision based on speculation with no facts meaning there is no insecurity here. I indicated that some of what was said was in-part t***hs meaning half t***hs or worse. Never said my mind worked better just indicated that perhaps my research was deeper. The primary objection to the referenced link was what I initially said in that all of the articles were opinions not fact based and you can not argue that point maintaining any sense of credibility. Sorry you took my comments as a affront; was not intended as such just simply pointing out what appeared obvious to me.
Go to
Aug 4, 2014 05:18:00   #
Alicia wrote:
********************
Here you go AuntiE.

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/03/29/republican-led-southern-states-d**gging-america-l***hing-tax-dollars.html


Alicia, one must be able to distinguish fact from fiction before stating opinion and having read all of the articles in the link you provided there was not one reference to a single fact. Only opinion, plain and simple; a lot of words designed to confuse the uninformed liberals. You ate it up because you wished it to be fact. Some of the information was in part true and I know this from my personal research and knowledge, not from facts provided by the articles. The scattering of partial t***hs only undermines the credibility of the writer as is the case here. Pure dribble written to confuse and BTW you swallowed it hook, line and sinker. Poor child, you have my sympathy along with your cohorts assembled here. However, enjoy yourselves your time is running short.
Go to
Aug 4, 2014 03:50:44   #
Kay Littrell wrote:
You forget that the goal of all so called environmentalists is not the protection of the Earth's environment but the punishment and eventual extermination of the human population to protect the environment.

This video is gripping but it will not do one iota to warm up an Environmentalists heart to emphasize with the plight of the coal miners or of anyone else whose job environmentalism has k**led.

Maybe Environmentalists are like the Tin Man in the Wizard of Oz, they never had a heart or else they couldn't recognize a heart if it jumped out of the coal miner's chest that the Environmentalists were kicking while he was down and bit the Environmentalist on her A$$.
You forget that the goal of all so called environm... (show quote)


Kay, you will not win the argument with these two nitwits for two simple reasons. One is the fact they do not understand logic but more importantly the second reason being is you can't fix stupid. Last but not least they really do not care if their cost of energy doubles since they still live in their mothers basement. The miner made a impassioned plea that fell on deft ears and all the nitwits can do is repeat Obama's creed of Corporate greed. Sure there are other means of producing energy but you don't destroy one that is economically sound at everyone expense before you bring the other sources on line. Well, a reasonable individual would not do that but does the EPA really care about being reasonable. I think not. Sad, Sad situation for all.
Go to
Jul 11, 2014 00:45:03   #
ginger wrote:
So, Hobby Lobby is allowed to have "religious freedom" but none of their female workers are? How is that right?


Ginger, It is really quite simple; the female employee may protect herself at the cost of a contraceptive of her choice or find herself another job that supplies her needs. BTW she may also go to the church of her choice so where is the infringement on her Religious Freedoms.
Go to
Jul 3, 2014 03:47:27   #
rumitoid wrote:
The heavy bias of four justices in favor of Big Business has been obvious throughout their tenure, such as going away for a weekend with the Koch brothers before that week's hearing on Super Pacts. Coincidence, I know. We all know who lawyers, and apparently judges, can twist and distort the law or facts to favor their view (OJ Simpson, the Twinkie defense, McDonald's hot coffee to name a fraction of a fraction). The Justices are not above being tricked by their passions or causes into distorting the Constitution, were interpretation has a fairly wide range. They are not seeing clearly. Corporations are not people but SCOTUS just granted them First Class citizenship over their Second Class employees.
The heavy bias of four justices in favor of Big Bu... (show quote)


Rumy, you force me to break my vow of silence concerning you. However, in the attempt to put your wellbeing before my personal feelings I beg that you check your medications more closely; something is bad out of balance. This may be fact checked by the fact that Nickolai has agreed with you and I have never known of him being right on anything. Good luck on your recovery.
Go to
Jul 3, 2014 03:33:55   #
Super Dave wrote:
I thought it was Cheney...


Cheney is to them as Obama is to us . The Antichrist, the purveyor of all that is evil.
Go to
Jul 3, 2014 03:27:08   #
Ricktloml wrote:
Isn't it funny how when a 5-4 decision, like Roberts rewriting Obamacare is dandy, when the Constitution is actually followed all of a sudden it's a travesty. I'm so sick and tired of listening to this bleating about the Koch brothers. Obama started his political career in the home of an unrepentant d******c t*******t, has told calculated lies repeatedly, arrogantly and blatantly proclaims he fully intends to ignore the Constitution and his oath of office, while engaging in power grabs that are unprecedented and the Koch brothers are the problem?! No an imperial power hungry president and the f*****t Democrat party that are attacking all our liberties, including religious ones are the huge problem
Isn't it funny how when a 5-4 decision, like Rober... (show quote)


AMEN !! Brother. :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 23:39:25   #
tom1942 wrote:
All this is being done to protect those in power. They are running scared. Washington doesn't understand the threat of radical Islam, and what is needed to fight it. The invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a limited engagement meant to remove a dictator, and establish a democracy. It missed the point entirely on both counts. When dealing with a threat that radical Islam presents would require the call-up of 2-3 million recruits and the manufacture of aircraft, and tanks similar to WWII. It would require the invasion of every Islamic nation on a friend or foe basis. It would need to be strategic. The war would end when radical Islam (I am forbidden to identify them any other way) as a way of life would be suppressed for a hundred years. To wipe the threat out entirely would require utter genocide, which for us would be repugnant; although a radical Islamic conquest would result in our utter destruction. There are those who seek safety in trying to deal politically and diplomatically with this threat; which in the end only increases the threat. Radical Islam smells blood. And until we realize the scope of this threat, the sooner the better.
All this is being done to protect those in power. ... (show quote)


Tom, I will pass the torch to you. I agree totally with what your saying and believe we ,you and I, are on the same page. I have been attempting to communicate my concerns of radical Islam for over a year now her on this site but failed. Therefore the passing of the torch. Good Luck. BTW, If you care to see what I said about this subject just go back to my previous posts.
Go to
Jun 12, 2014 22:35:27   #
squirrelmender wrote:
Already been to the website and am getting involved. Will send letter to my editor tomorrow.


Really appreciate your interest and involvement. I had hoped for more people from OPP getting involved in this project. If we had more people like you that will jump in and attempt to do something rather than sitting back and complaining about things we would be in a much better position all around. Again, I appreciate you getting involved and if I can be of any assistance please let me know.
Returning the power to the States to me is the single most important issue we are facing. Sure we have a multitude of problems on the table at present and that will only grow under the present administration but most of said problems could be resolved almost overnight with the right leadership. The Article Five issue is a long term fix for what has ailed us for a long time on a multitude of issues so it won't be easy and the grassroots movement push is a must for this to happen. The power brokers will fight this all the way to the Statehouse steps so we must be vigilant. THANKS! :thumbup:
Go to
Jun 5, 2014 22:45:50   #
J Anthony wrote:
I'm all for a broad coalition that transcends the current party system and challenges the insatiable power-lust of the plutocratic establishment. What is it that you think would help to get started, specifically?


As I said in the beginning this idea transcends party lines; its about curtailing the power brokers in Washington on both sides and returning the power and decisions to the States as originally intended. The grassroots movement must generate enough noise in our local statehouses, i.e. letters, faxes to local representatives, letter to local newspaper editors etc. to get the necessary attention.
Go to "conventionofstates.com" and follow the different links for a plethora of information. Thanks for the interest and let me know if I can help.
Go to
Jun 5, 2014 19:57:12   #
J Anthony wrote:
We should all be for a less bloated federal government that actually is of, by, and for all it's people. But first we have to get to the root-cause of what the problems are. Taking our government back would have to involve taking back money-issuing powers from private international bankers, who for a century straight have had the authority to create our money-supply as a debt to them. As the monetary-system is the system on which all other systems turn, we'd have to start there.


Anthony, I respectfully disagree not with your premise of the monetary issue and all things turning on same but as the point of where to start. We have a vehicle for change given us within our existing Constitution. The means of how to accomplish said change is explained very clearly. However, we must have a Grassroots movement pushing our elected representatives to favor the will of the people and not concentrating on their own individual best interest. Once we have the powers relocated within arms length meaning close-in so they may be monitored closely and not located in Washington where we only see them every two or six years we will attack the monetary issue. The root of the problem you refer to was caused by two wars, the Revolution and the Civil meaning this is not a problem that will go away overnight. The root of the other problem is greed by the elected officials in Washington and I see that as a much easier albeit not easy problem to solve.
Now, can we count on you to help or just disagree on where to start. I hope it is the first.
Go to
Jun 5, 2014 19:10:33   #
Don't know how it happened but the post above should take you to the new link I was referring to but somehow it switched back to the previous link so I ask you to read the post above and apply the statement to the attached link. Sorry about that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=CS0L09tcsas#t=323
Go to
Jun 5, 2014 17:59:22   #
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVQH0JbwIgA&feature=player_embedded

Activate the same way as above. Right click and go to copied address.
O.K. I know the graphics are distracting but listen to the message. Lets try a different approach since I'm not getting a lot of response the other way. Do we need to make a change in the status quo?
Go to
Jun 5, 2014 17:32:47   #
stymie wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVQH0JbwIgA&feature=player_embedded

Watch and take action if you like what you see!!
Please people, get involved.


To activate link just right click and go to copied address.
Go to
Jun 5, 2014 17:28:13   #
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVQH0JbwIgA&feature=player_embedded

Watch and take action if you like what you see!!
Please people, get involved.

To activate just right click on link and go to copied address.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 42 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.