permafrost wrote:
It is a difficult concept, a law is passed, signed, upheld by the SC...But by god we don`t like it. Must be a violation of the constitution somehow.. No, well we will take the money and go home..The pity is the ACA will get started even without immediate funding. Changes are possible by the legislative process but they seem to not want to do that..Obstructionist must be the correct term for them, no solutions only impediment.
Exactly where in the US Constitution does it say that the federal government has the authorization to tell individuals and businesses what and how our health care will be? Do you believe the US Constitution implies that the US Congress can meddle in every, and I emphasize EVERY, aspect of our lives? Does the Constitution state anywhere within it that your property can be confiscated by the government in order to give it to someone who has less than you?