stymie wrote:
Second we have the right to practice religion anywhere we like and you have the option of sticking a finger in your ear or leaving.
Stymie, you seem to forget that Liberals believe they have a "right" to be free from being offended, all the while making every effort to offend others. They do not believe in changing the channel or station, they do not believe it is they who should have to leave as they have just as much right to be there as you.
Their "right" to not be offended, which is not granted by any Constitutional Law, Natural Law, Written Law or Implied Law of which I know, trumps all other rights. They should not be offended, and they who offend them should be made to leave or stop practicing what they are doing until THEY, the Liberals, leave in due time. Censorship should exist to prevent that possibility of being offended. Remember Howard Stern? I loath the man and pretty much for all which stands and represents. I have two choices, listen to him or not listen to him. As I believe in his Freedom of Speech right, while I find his speech offensive, is all encompassing, I choose not to listen. It was Liberals succeeding in censorship that forced him off public radio airwaves and into the satellite radio network. What is worse, even when you have to pay a fee to listen to the man, Liberals want him off those airwaves as well.
Liberal logic states if it is offensive, censor it.
A Liberal has no problem with someone in a high school wearing an Obama T-shirt, but suspends a kid for wearing an NRA T-shirt.
Who really cares more about First Amendment Rights?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.For that matter, who cares more for INDIVIDUAL rights? From what I can see, it sure as hell is not a Liberal.
By the way, see the second phrase? "prohibiting the free exercise thereof". That phrase directly references the first phrase "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". When the Catholic Church says they do not want to have to pay for abortions or birth control, because they go against their religious principles, and ACA forces them to pay for both, does that not violate the Catholic Church's right to "free exercise" of their religion?