Of The, By The For The (Page 3): sorry about that...

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

banjojack wrote:

I was referring to the Federal Reserve, not people with a lot of money. The Fed never had any morals to lose.

sorry about that

Loki Loc: Georgia

cesspool jones wrote:

sorry about that

I have no problem with rich people, as long as they are not bankers, lawyers, or politicians, or other two legged turds.

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

banjojack wrote:

I have no problem with rich people, as long as they are not bankers, lawyers, or politicians, or other two legged turds.

i have no qualm with rich folks...just what some become once they get rich.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

slatten49 wrote:

I can say that your example is the best kind of "grassroots" activism!

Will you join me in a "grassroots" attempt to appreciate the color, "burnt-orange". I see it as an attempt to more civilize our country. I see no reasonable argument against such a movement. :thumbup: :mrgreen:It would be "nice" if AuntiE saw her way to gin up support for this overdue idea. :lol:

I will most assuredly join in a "grassroots" activism. The color has great potential to be below the roots of grass. Was that what you thinking? :mrgreen: :-D :-D

Schuler Loc: Santa Fe NM

Very and most rich people are Republicans-government is owned and controlled by the rich -who are Republicans- who control the thing called 'big government'--who are the rich--who are Republicans--oh--I said that--so who is on first, last and always-the rich Republicans who are in control of 'big government-who 'own' the politicians who are wannabe rich people-is that clear enough??-now VOTE for Democrats --that is if the Republicans don't take it away!

cesspool jones Loc: atlanta

Schuler wrote:

Very and most rich people are Republicans-government is owned and controlled by the rich -who are Republicans- who control the thing called 'big government'--who are the rich--who are Republicans--oh--I said that--so who is on first, last and always-the rich Republicans who are in control of 'big government-who 'own' the politicians who are wannabe rich people-is that clear enough??-now VOTE for Democrats --that is if the Republicans don't take it away!

get back to yer drink

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Schuler wrote:

Very and most rich people are Republicans-government is owned and controlled by the rich -who are Republicans- who control the thing called 'big government'--who are the rich--who are Republicans--oh--I said that--so who is on first, last and always-the rich Republicans who are in control of 'big government-who 'own' the politicians who are wannabe rich people-is that clear enough??-now VOTE for Democrats --that is if the Republicans don't take it away!

Absolutely. We all know the Democrats never have $25,000 per plate fund raising dinners in Hollywood or New York. The Democrats never give special breaks to Hollywood or unions. Absolutely not. Only Republicans have big donors. I guess the study that was issued last year as to donations by big business showing substantially more to Democrats was just fiction. I am so pleased you have provided me with accurate information with no substantiation except your brain. :thumbdown:

Loki Loc: Georgia

AuntiE wrote:

Absolutely. We all know the Democrats never have $25,000 per plate fund raising dinners in Hollywood or New York. The Democrats never give special breaks to Hollywood or unions. Absolutely not. Only Republicans have big donors. I guess the study that was issued last year as to donations by big business showing substantially more to Democrats was just fiction. I am so pleased you have provided me with accurate information with no substantiation except your brain. :thumbdown:

Brain? I observed no evidence of any such thing, and you know my eyes are far better than yours.

Loki Loc: Georgia

AuntiE wrote:

Absolutely. We all know the Democrats never have $25,000 per plate fund raising dinners in Hollywood or New York. The Democrats never give special breaks to Hollywood or unions. Absolutely not. Only Republicans have big donors. I guess the study that was issued last year as to donations by big business showing substantially more to Democrats was just fiction. I am so pleased you have provided me with accurate information with no substantiation except your brain. :thumbdown:

Brain? I observed no evidence of any such thing, and you know my eyes are far better than yours.

Loki Loc: Georgia

AuntiE wrote:

Absolutely. We all know the Democrats never have $25,000 per plate fund raising dinners in Hollywood or New York. The Democrats never give special breaks to Hollywood or unions. Absolutely not. Only Republicans have big donors. I guess the study that was issued last year as to donations by big business showing substantially more to Democrats was just fiction. I am so pleased you have provided me with accurate information with no substantiation except your brain. :thumbdown:

Brain? I observed no evidence of any such thing, and you know my eyes are far better than yours.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

banjojack wrote:

I have no problem with rich people, as long as they are not bankers, lawyers, or politicians, or other two legged turds.

According to Schuler's post only Republicans receive big money donations from business. I am so glad he provided me that information. Obviously the $25,000 per plate event in Hollywood that the President attended was thrown by Republicans. Maybe it was McCain who set it up for him.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

banjojack wrote:

Brain? I observed no evidence of any such thing, and you know my eyes are far better than yours.

I HATE your eyesight! :!: :!: You know mine is abysmal.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

cesspool jones wrote:

get back to yer drink

Drink...did you not mean multiple drinks?

Comment Loc: California

octive9 wrote:

I don't like paying taxes any more than anyone else. However, there should be some concept of fairness. CEO's getting tens of millions of dollars to run companies into the ground while paying workers so little that the need government hand outs to survive is not "Fair and Balanced."

Workers can quit. They were not forced to take that job at $2 an hour. It's a free country. Wouldn't you say? If your answer is yes, then gov has no right to tell an employer how much he has to pay workers. Are you a Communist? I suggest that you get the education the CEO has and then you can give your millions to the workers. That should make you feel a lot better. You people are disgusting. You don't immerse yourself in education that would get you off the bottom. However, if you don't have the energy to educate yourself you don't have the energy to succeed. Due to your own inaptitude and failure, you get a welfare mindset that you and your colleagues should get all the profit made by your labor. That's Communist thinking. The Utopian form of government. Your Utopian gov doesn't work. The USSR proved that. To become a classless society w2herein all subjects are paid the same, the gov will assign it's subjects to work, not where you want too but, where it wants you. There is no incentive to become a doctor, or lawyer, or scientist, or any highly skilled workers when the uneducated, turned on ,drop our, lazy bums get the same pay. Your kind does not want to rise your self up,; you want to bring everyone down to your level. The USA tried that with LBJ's "Great Society." Trillions of dollars went into welfare and there are more people on welfare than ever before. It amazes me how persons on here have an opinion on subject that they know absolutely nothing about.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

AuntiE wrote:

I will most assuredly join in a "grassroots" activism. The color has great potential to be below the roots of grass. Was that what you thinking? :mrgreen: :-D :-D

You can probably imagine what I'm thinking right about now, my AuntiE. :shock: :hunf: :hunf: :hunf: :evil: