One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Hello, Marie Harf, anybody home?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Feb 19, 2015 18:33:43   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
oldroy wrote:
Has anyone heard about the promotion of Jen Psaki? Room for Harf to move up in the State Department. She lies at least as well as Psaki does.


Yep....

State Dept Spox Jen Psaki Made White House Comms Director
by Brendan Bordelon February 19, 2015 1:08 PM

After a rocky two-year tenure as State Department spokeswoman, Jen Psaki is getting a promotion.

The top P.R. flack for Secretary of State John Kerry is headed back to the White House, where she will replace communications director Jennifer Palmieri as she leaves to join Hillary Clinton’s burgeoning presidential campaign.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/414076/state-dept-spox-jen-psaki-made-white-house-comms-director-brendan-bordelon

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 18:34:13   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
bdamage wrote:
Not that this has anything to do with this thread....or does it?

State Dept. Deputy Spokeswoman Marie Harf Was Once Hospitalized For A Toxic Tampon
Posted: 18 Feb 2015 05:21 PM PST
http://gotnews.com/state-dept-deputy-spokeswoman-marie-harf-was-once-hospitalized-for-a-toxic-tampon/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gotnewsdotcom+%28Got+News%29
It may have a lot to do with it. The toxicity probably affected her brain.

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 18:36:21   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
oldroy wrote:
Has anyone heard about the promotion of Jen Psaki? Room for Harf to move up in the State Department. She lies at least as well as Psaki does.
Have you ever heard of the Peter Principle, which is that one rises to one's level of incompetence? This must mean Psaki wasn't considered incompetent enough where she is.

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2015 18:38:47   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
LAPhil wrote:
It may have a lot to do with it. The toxicity probably affected her brain.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 18:42:43   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
robert66 wrote:
"Join ISIS and you join Islam , Join Islam and you ISIS " This was on your post. Since you posted it I get the idea you agree with it. Therefore if ISIS and Islam are the same , and you want to kill ISIS , you are advocating killing all Muslims. You appear to believe there is no difference between Islam and ISIS. You can deem yourself the victor of your losing argument and try to mince words all you want but apparently you now want to deny the ignorant implications you have made.
Are you aware of just how illogical your argument is?

Does the name Islamic State of Iraq and Syria bear any implication that the terrorists are devotees of the Islamic faith?

When the ISIS killers recite suras from the Qu'ran as they stand with a knife over a bound, kneeling victim and then repeatedly shout "Allahu Ackbar" as they cut off his head, do you think they could be devotees of Islam?

There may be some on this board who advocate "killing all Muslims", but that is totally irrational thinking. Primarily because such a thing would be impractical, if not impossible.

A doctor does not kill the host of a malignant tumor in order to defeat the cancer.

The military solution to a problem like Islamic terrorism has been established for centuries. In 500 BC, Sun Tsu set down the principles for victory over an enemy and those principles have been taught in war colleges and military academies since. Every war captain worthy of the name has applied them.

Sun Tsu's first principle is to "break the enemy's will to fight WITHOUT FIGHTING." How is that accomplished? You simply build a military force of such strength that no enemy would dare fight you. And, you make it clear to the enemy that if they are foolish enough to try, you will hold nothing back and they will pay dearly.

However, Islamic Jihad, as with the Japanese near the end of the Second World War, are suicidal--kamikazes--their commitment to their objective of world domination under Sharia transcends any earthly concerns. They place little or no value on human life on earth.

So, the second principle comes into play. As with the Japanese in the Second World War (who, by the way, were preparing the entire population to fight to the death), you hurt the enemy so badly that they no longer have the will to fight. By the middle of 1945, it was clear to the allies that the Japanese Military Command had bastardized the Bushido code and demanded that every citizen glorify themselves in the name of the Emporer by sacrificing their lives. So, in order to prevent that, Truman made the decision to use the new weapon on the scene. In mid-August, 1945, folowing the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Emporer Hirohito had had enough, he ordered his military to surrender. As terrible as was the use of Atomic weapons, many lives on both sides were spared.

I am not, in any way, advocating the use of nuclear weapons in defeating Islamic Jihad, however, that option should never have been taken off the table. Nor, am I advocating "killing all Muslims". ALL Muslims is 1.6 billion people, bob, and not all of them are Jihadis. Whatever the number is of Muslims who want no part of Islamic Jihad, they are not the problem, are they? Nor, are the Jihadis themselves the real problem. The real problem is the nearly absolute failure of the leaders of the civilized nations who are the targets of the Jihad to even acknowledge that such an impacable enemy is a mortal threat to civilization.

The responses from Obama, and other national leaders, to the threat of Islamic Jihad is unconscionable, unforgivable, and shameful, and as is the case with Obama, all indications, all evidence--from the man's own mouth--is that in his rhetoric is hidden either a pathological denial that a threat exists or that he harbors a desire for an Islamic victory. He has effectively broken the back of our armed forces. He has reduced the defense budget to the level of a Banana republic, he has replaced our warriors at the top with politically correct "yes men", he has curbed weapons development and production, and virtually destroyed our troop morale--it is lower now than at any time in our history. Moreover, Obama's open border "come one, come all" policy has opened the door wide to an attack, be it chemical, biological, or even nuclear. It will not take an army of Jihadis to poison our water and food supplies, spread a lethal disease, knock out major power grids, or even, God forbid, detonate a dirty bomb or a tactical nuke in one of our major cities.

The bottom line, bob, is that ISIS is leading the Islamic Jihad and we, of sane mind and firm conviction, who recognize the threat for what it is and truly want to see an end to this insanity see no leaders willing to do whatever it takes to destroy it before it is too late.

The Islamic Regime in Iran is going to get their nuclear weapons, no one is stopping them, and there are maybe two or three national leaders who are trying desperately to sound the alarm. The military solution is simply to unleash overwhelming firepower and hammer ISIS so hard, make them pay such a dear price that that their backs are broken, economically and militarily. Sadly, that should have been done a long time ago. And, there is no indication whatsoever that it will be done now or in the near future. All I can see at this juncture is that, since leadership has failed us, we, as Individual Americans, should pray for the best and prepare for the worst. I am, for sure.

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 18:51:14   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Are you aware of just how illogical your argument is?

Does the name Islamic State of Iraq and Syria bear any implication that the terrorists are devotees of the Islamic faith?

When the ISIS killers recite suras from the Qu'ran as they stand with a knife over a bound, kneeling victim and then repeatedly shout "Allahu Ackbar" as they cut off his head, do you think they could be devotees of Islam?

There may be some on this board who advocate "killing all Muslims", but that is totally irrational thinking. Primarily because such a thing would be impractical, if not impossible.

A doctor does not kill the host of a malignant tumor in order to defeat the cancer.

The military solution to a problem like Islamic terrorism has been established for centuries. In 500 BC, Sun Tsu set down the principles for victory over an enemy and those principles have been taught in war colleges and military academies since. Every war captain worthy of the name has applied them.

Sun Tsu's first principle is to "break the enemy's will to fight WITHOUT FIGHTING." How is that accomplished? You simply build a military force of such strength that no enemy would dare fight you. And, you make it clear to the enemy that if they are foolish enough to try, you will hold nothing back and they will pay dearly.

However, Islamic Jihad, as with the Japanese near the end of the Second World War, are suicidal--kamikazes--their commitment to their objective of world domination under Sharia transcends any earthly concerns. They place little or no value on human life on earth.

So, the second principle comes into play. As with the Japanese in the Second World War (who, by the way, were preparing the entire population to fight to the death), you hurt the enemy so badly that they no longer have the will to fight. By the middle of 1945, it was clear to the allies that the Japanese Military Command had bastardized the Bushido code and demanded that every citizen glorify themselves in the name of the Emporer by sacrificing their lives. So, in order to prevent that, Truman made the decision to use the new weapon on the scene. In mid-August, 1945, folowing the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Emporer Hirohito had had enough, he ordered his military to surrender. As terrible as was the use of Atomic weapons, many lives on both sides were spared.

I am not, in any way, advocating the use of nuclear weapons in defeating Islamic Jihad, however, that option should never have been taken off the table. Nor, am I advocating "killing all Muslims". ALL Muslims is 1.6 billion people, bob, and not all of them are Jihadis. Whatever the number is of Muslims who want no part of Islamic Jihad, they are not the problem, are they? Nor, are the Jihadis themselves the real problem. The real problem is the nearly absolute failure of the leaders of the civilized nations who are the targets of the Jihad to even acknowledge that such an impacable enemy is a mortal threat to civilization.

The responses from Obama, and other national leaders, to the threat of Islamic Jihad is unconscionable, unforgivable, and shameful, and as is the case with Obama, all indications, all evidence--from the man's own mouth--is that in his rhetoric is hidden either a pathological denial that a threat exists or that he harbors a desire for an Islamic victory. He has effectively broken the back of our armed forces. He has reduced the defense budget to the level of a Banana republic, he has replaced our warriors at the top with politically correct "yes men", he has curbed weapons development and production, and virtually destroyed our troop morale--it is lower now than at any time in our history. Moreover, Obama's open border "come one, come all" policy has opened the door wide to an attack, be it chemical, biological, or even nuclear. It will not take an army of Jihadis to poison our water and food supplies, spread a lethal disease, knock out major power grids, or even, God forbid, detonate a dirty bomb or a tactical nuke in one of our major cities.

The bottom line, bob, is that ISIS is leading the Islamic Jihad and we, of sane mind and firm conviction, who recognize the threat for what it is and truly want to see an end to this insanity see no leaders willing to do whatever it takes to destroy it before it is too late.

The Islamic Regime in Iran is going to get their nuclear weapons, no one is stopping them, and there are maybe two or three national leaders who are trying desperately to sound the alarm. The military solution is simply to unleash overwhelming firepower and hammer ISIS so hard, make them pay such a dear price that that their backs are broken, economically and militarily. Sadly, that should have been done a long time ago. And, there is no indication whatsoever that it will be done now or in the near future. All I can see at this juncture is that, since leadership has failed us, we, as Individual Americans, should pray for the best and prepare for the worst. I am, for sure.
Are you aware of just how illogical your argument ... (show quote)
Blade Runner, you're good! Thanks for another excellent post!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 19:06:06   #
DamnYANKEE
 
LAPhil wrote:
How do these airheads ever get to where they are?

"State Department Spokesperson Marie Harf told Chris Matthews tonight that we cannot win this war with ISIS by killing them. She said we have to get to the root cause of why people are attracted to Jihad — you know like poverty, jobs, etc…

'We’re killing a lot of them and we’re going to keep killing more of them. So are the Egyptians, so are the Jordanians. They’re in this fight with us. But we cannot win this war by killing them. We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it’s lack of opportunity for jobs…' "

Read more: http://therightscoop.com/state-dept-spox-on-isis-we-cannot-win-this-war-by-killing-them/#ixzz3S7C7xZSH
How do these airheads ever get to where they are? ... (show quote)


Home ??? NOPE . Lights aint on Either

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2015 19:09:04   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
LAPhil wrote:
Blade Runner, you're good! Thanks for another excellent post!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Thanks, Phil. I tell ya, it pains me to no end to know that there is a sizable number of so-called Americans whose devotion to Obama and his regime has completely confounded them. Their loyalty to and absolute faith in government rather than a genuine love of the nation as a whole is beyond the pale. I cannot abide such ignorance of America's greatness and such utter contempt for those of us who embrace the principles of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

"against all enemies, foreign and domestic", Phil, I swore the oath when I was 17, and I own it.

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 20:38:16   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
PoppaGringo wrote:
Killing IS the Islamist solution for every problem they face.


SO RIGHT POPPA
JOIN US OR DIE
THAT IS THEIR MOTTO
THEY FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT ISIS HAS BEEN CHOSEN BY ALLAH TO BRING THE WORLD TO ARMAGEDON
AND THEY ESPOUSE THAT KILLING INFIDELS PAVES THE WAY

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 20:40:15   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
robert66 wrote:
So you think killing all Muslims is the answer ?



no Robert
they think killing all of us is the answer

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 20:42:29   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
bdamage wrote:
Yeah...she did a great job and I would've given her an "A"....that is if she were in a high school sophomore class giving a report....because that's what it sounded like.



bd
you give her much too much credit

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2015 20:46:31   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Don't y'all get it yet? Marie Harf is an airhead. She is simply parroting the state dept narrative. Think John F -ing Kerry. Total disconnect from reality.

The ISIS killers have jobs, they are dedicated "workers" who are winning awards for their good work. They are well funded by some fat cats living in royal luxury in Syria. ISIS is now issuing its own driver's licenses, minting its own coins, has its own bank and media production company.

Coming to a neighborhood near you.

Unless someone grows the balls to stop them.
Don't y'all get it yet? Marie Harf is an airhead. ... (show quote)


ore than likely already here blade

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 20:49:27   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
robert66 wrote:
I wrote "like this". Meaning my interpretation of her statement. Who will be the one to try to kill all Muslims ? No wonder those people hate us.


wake up Robert
they hate us because we aren't muslim
its in their quran
either bring the unbelievers unto islam
or slay them

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 22:11:34   #
old roughneck
 
Madame Harf is another nut case in bozobamas` harem of fruitcakes. She needs to pull her socks up and realize what`s going on around her....time to face reality. However she`s probable too stupid to realize what is happening. Bozobama brainwashed. Like all the others in his pool of yes men. Ms.Harf may not realize it but the fact is the ISIS HEATHENS do have a job. Murdering,killing,raping and pillaging is their job. Send her smartass over there to negotiate jobs to those blood thirsty heathens. Adios Harf.

Reply
Feb 19, 2015 22:33:27   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
badbobby wrote:
ore than likely already here blade
No doubt in my mind.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.