rumitoid wrote:
I do not have the exact figure about how many threads here have noted at least twenty impeachable offenses by the president but it has been quite a bit; over a hundred does not seem farfetched. From what I gathered to be the sole reason these proceedings have been delayed was the Democrat held Senate, which would never indict. That obstacle is gone. If Obama's crimes are so patently egregious and numerous, as Republicans for years have complained about his birth certificate and the many "scandals," impeachment proceedings should surely start at the first session, right?
And of course it is not just OPP that has been extremely vocal but prominent members of Congress, Fox News, and other Conservative voices. These proceedings against Obama, by all accounts on the Right, should be a given, especially with the only obstacle removed to success. I can imagine that salivating over this "done deal" has begun for many. But what if it doesn't happen?
Like Blacks "droning on and on about racism" in America, the Right has droned on and on about the president's actions in office. All the dragged out and harped upon "scandals," none the less of which are his "imperial" executive orders (less than Bush) and his expensive vacations (less than Bush), has made him out to be as sinister as Mao. If Congress does not look to impeach, what could possibly be the reason? Could it be one of these two things: much ado about nothing or a tempest in a teacup?
I do not have the exact figure about how many thre... (
show quote)
Our "dear" leader has gone well beyond "Impeachable offenses," and has crossed the line into "mass murder." Fast and Furious is still killing people on both sides of the border; and Benghazi is still being "stonewalled," due to the long deadly battle, the deaths of 4 great Americans' and a "stand-down" order that could only be legitimate coming from the most senior, "in-the-loop." "Book 'em Danno!!!" In [this] case, book 'em "Sheriff Joe."