One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Keystone Pipeline
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Nov 12, 2014 21:48:04   #
Airforceone
 
vernon wrote:
i have never heard that number.the biggest number ive heard is 20k.and that includes the port operations and every thing.


Are you kidding me Boehner said it 2 days ago. And besides 20,000 temporary jobs and no oil for the US how does it help the US and is it worth the risk

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 21:49:24   #
Airforceone
 
vernon wrote:
just where did you get these (facts) or is this something you copied from some demorat stratigst.


Ya I made it up tell me where 575,000 jobs are and how much of that oil do we get

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 21:53:32   #
Airforceone
 
son of witless wrote:
It will create 4 million jobs. Wait, no it won't. I got it mixed up with green jobs. Never mind.

Anyway there you go again asking questions when you never answer any yourself.


I did answer u just don't want to except facts. You keep saying job creation where are those jobs I can't find it anywhere the best I could find was TransCanada quote of anywhere from 1,500 to 4,650 temporary jobs. That was quoted from the people that are building it.

Reply
 
 
Nov 12, 2014 22:09:30   #
Airforceone
 
I guess you guys don't listen to Boehners press conference or Mitch McConnell are they lying about the Keystone jobs numbers why won't just one of you explain to me how it creates 575,000 jobs, how much of that oil do we get, and is it worth the risk of leaks and blowouts to supple Canadian oil to the international market.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 22:20:36   #
son of witless
 
tdsrnest wrote:
I did answer u just don't want to except facts. You keep saying job creation where are those jobs I can't find it anywhere the best I could find was TransCanada quote of anywhere from 1,500 to 4,650 temporary jobs. That was quoted from the people that are building it.


I will always beat you obamabot loyalists over the head with one fact and that is hypocrisy. You guys always use different standards to judge what your side does as opposed to what our side does.

We who are right do not play the hypocrite game. We use the same high standards for ourselves as we do for you. Why do you dare use the term temporary jobs for the Keystone pipeline, when you guys bragged about all of the infrastructure jobs you were going to create, which by definition are TEMPORARY? And by the way very few of those TEMPORARY infrastructure jobs appeared.

Anyway your figures are pure Obama sh*t. That means false.

According to http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/02/07/the-keystone-pipeline-would-create-thousands-of-jobs/

Obama's own State Dept estimates 42,000 Temporary construction jobs. Temporary is better than NONE, which is what we got now!!!!!!!!!!

Then you got the manufacturing jobs that making hundreds of miles of pipe will produce. I wonder how many steel workers will find work producing the 400,000 tons of steel? What doncha get about that ?????

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 22:23:47   #
theoldguy44
 
Every time I see a comment that includes GOPTP I realize that the contributor is a resolute moron. But then again he's most likely a Democrat which definitely has that market cornered. With a sterling intelligent lineup like Pelosi, Reid, Barbara Jordan, Shiela Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters, Alan Grayson and Debbie the Ditz any other prognosis would be bereft of content.

Reply
Nov 12, 2014 22:27:20   #
son of witless
 
theoldguy44 wrote:
Every time I see a comment that includes GOPTP I realize that the contributor is a resolute moron. But then again he's most likely a Democrat which definitely has that market cornered. With a sterling intelligent lineup like Pelosi, Reid, Barbara Jordan, Shiela Jackson Lee, Maxine Waters, Alan Grayson and Debbie the Ditz any other prognosis would be bereft of content.



They know what they know and they will never let facts dissuade them.

Reply
 
 
Nov 13, 2014 07:05:07   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
tdsrnest wrote:
No tell me how this pipeline creates 575,000 jobs

Thats 575,000 "saved or created" jobs.

There. That proves it using Obama standards.

Reply
Nov 13, 2014 07:11:32   #
1henry
 
Lets just cut to the chase. This pipelines intent is to reduce or eliminate or need for foreign oil, and the dipstick has halted it, 1 he hates America, and 2 he hates white people. Sorry to resort to the race card, but I believe in calling a spade a spade. Fact; economy is in the toilet. Fact; gas is at an all time high. Fact; the unemployment rate is near an all time high. Fact; this pipeline would put thousands of Americans to work. Fact; the damn dems have blocked it's construction. So this goes out to our newly elected officials, if you compromise your job will be at steak, and I am speaking for hundreds of thousands of legal American citizens. Fact.

Reply
Nov 13, 2014 07:14:16   #
1henry
 
My location is not anyone's concern, just know this I am an American and love this country, a hell of a lot more than those phony flag waving dem's.

Reply
Nov 13, 2014 07:14:23   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
tdsrnest wrote:
As reported by TransCanada at the senate committee meetings could generate somewhere from 2,500 jobs to 4,650 temporary jobs for 2 years. This was reported by the company building the pipeline. They have since generated some very wild numbers since that hearing in the senate that was televised on CSPAN which I watched. And none of this garbage being posted by Boehner or McConnell comes even close to what these people testified to.

Rather than bringing us energy security it will transport dirty Canadian oil through Americas Heartland's, for delivery to China and other countries. Rather than oil independence it will leave a legacy of poisoned lands and water all for at most 100 permanent jobs and a few billion $ in tax revenue.

Besides the Nebraska court ruling on eminent Domain ruling the governor did not have the right to approve such a project on his own. For congress to bypass this ruling is against the constitution. But what happen to the GOPTP agenda on states rights. ????????

So let's look at a few things and let's start with leaks. Do these pipelines leak yes all the time. They leak because of rust from the water in the oil. Tar sands oil contains a lot more water than most oils, because of the way it is extracted with super heated water and chemicals. The water mixes with the dirt which forms a sludge in the bottom of the pipe which breeds bacteria that will produce sulfur and the process of corrosion from inside speeds up.

The first symptom of corrosion is what's called pinhole leaks. A pinhole leak of 2% is not detectable by keystone instruments of leak detection. So if a leak accrues it may not be noticed for months. So if a 2% leak of 485,000 barrels per day leaks for 90 days or before it comes to the surface or someone does not notice it over 400 acres could be contaminated with flooded oil. This floode oil could reach our rivers and steams with rain runoff and fall runoff. You could go a full winter from snow cover and frozen ground before anybody notices it.

A pinhole leak under water in a wetlands will not get noticed unless there is an actual burst in the line. And keystone passes over countless wetlands that drain into lake Ashtabula and the Cheyenne. Pipelines also split along there seams and will fracture under high pressure and this causes high levels of spill. And Keystone oil needs very high pressures to pipe this heavy oil.

Also the keystone pipe thickness is going to be a lot less thinner that what was used in Alaska. So it will take less time to corrode and run a risk of a seam burst.

Let's talk leak detections it offers real time , non stop monitoring along the lines route. When the sensor detects a sharp change in pressure or flow rate it sets off an alarm. Then company personnel conduct additional tests to determine if there actually is a leak.

Alarms can be triggered by non- threatening activities for example buildup in bubbles which generates alarms constantly. What happens in fact some operators get use to constant false alarms, and many times they become dismissive of real leaks. I found a number of examples but just to verify I looked up the Enbrige leak in July of 2010 which discharged more than 1 million gallons of oil into Michigan's Kalamazoo river. They estimated up to 1000 false alarms per month. But keep in mode that leak detection will not send an alarm for a 2% leak.

(If you get 1000 false alarms per month, what happens when you get a real alarm. How do you know the difference). (YOU DON'T)

Although leak detection does work the overwhelming majority of pipeline leaks , spills, ruptures, were discovered by someone near the leaks. Now what does disturb me the most is leak detection through deregulation is not required throughout the pipeline only in environmental areas. This regulation was supported by the GOPTP at the Senate hearings. So leak detection cannot always distinguish between leaks and normal fluctuations.

Now the pipeline is projected to carry 830,000 barrels per day through a 36 inch pipeline. Estimates depending on who you want to listen to varies from 1,500 to 7,000 temporary jobs and up to 100 per infant jobs.

The pipeline will crossover rivers wider than 100 feet. Such as the Missouri, Platte, Niobrara, and 11 others. Can anybody understand what a 2% leak undetected for any amount of time the amount of pollutants will be in these rivers.

Somebody needs to explain to me how a 36 inch pipeline run over 890 miles is going to create 575,000 jobs as John Boehner and Mich McConnell keep telling us. TransCanada the people building this pipeline say a maximum of 4,650 and 100 permanent jobs. Some say in the area of 7,000 temporary jobs. Now originally TransCanada said that all pipe fittings and steel would be manufactured in this country that would have created an additional 2,000 temporary jobs is now going to be imported from Korea. So just using a little common sense 890 miles of 36 inch pipe will take 646 men per mile.

So we build this pipeline across rivers streams, environmental sensitive areas pump it to the Koch Brothers refinery in Texas load it on a barge and sell it on the international market. This has no benefit to this country it makes no sense.

So if the GOPTP is concerned about a few temporary jobs which is stunning to say the least. Why are they blocking the American jobs act and we have tons of roads and bridges in need of repairs that would actually create thousands and thousands of actual good paying jobs. But let's not stand in the way of Boehners stock portfolio and the Koch Brothers machine. This is propaganda at its best. And the Koch brothers are great at fooling the American people after all you don't become one of the richest guys in the world by telling the truth all the time. They are very bright but also very slick.

But it appears that the democrats are going to cave in on this issue and when the OPP bloggers realize the issues around this pipeline was a pipe dream it will be t late. But let's give the GOPTP what they want the voters have told us to back off and give them what they want.
As reported by TransCanada at the senate committee... (show quote)




None of that really matters. Should this pipeline be built, it will be to nowhere. Those tar sands have already been sold and alternate delivery strategies are already in place. Did they really think that the Canadian business venture would WAIT for the Americans?

The GOP really has no choice but to continue championing this useless pipeline, because they promised it as a "prize" for the heavy investments they received during the 2012 elections. The companies building the pipeline don't care that it's now a worthless project, they were going to make their money off of it's construction alone. The fact that the pipeline will, once constructed, remain empty - doesn't faze them a bit.

Reply
 
 
Nov 13, 2014 08:22:53   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Thanks for your research and posting. I believe the thing will be built.The construction jobs will provide a temporary boost. The pipe being made in Korea is a slap in the face to American steel companys. The Canadian oil goes to export.Some one is going to make Billions and it won't be us.The risk to American water and soil is high. Time will tell.
tdsrnest wrote:
As reported by TransCanada at the senate committee meetings could generate somewhere from 2,500 jobs to 4,650 temporary jobs for 2 years. This was reported by the company building the pipeline. They have since generated some very wild numbers since that hearing in the senate that was televised on CSPAN which I watched. And none of this garbage being posted by Boehner or McConnell comes even close to what these people testified to.

Rather than bringing us energy security it will transport dirty Canadian oil through Americas Heartland's, for delivery to China and other countries. Rather than oil independence it will leave a legacy of poisoned lands and water all for at most 100 permanent jobs and a few billion $ in tax revenue.

Besides the Nebraska court ruling on eminent Domain ruling the governor did not have the right to approve such a project on his own. For congress to bypass this ruling is against the constitution. But what happen to the GOPTP agenda on states rights. ????????

So let's look at a few things and let's start with leaks. Do these pipelines leak yes all the time. They leak because of rust from the water in the oil. Tar sands oil contains a lot more water than most oils, because of the way it is extracted with super heated water and chemicals. The water mixes with the dirt which forms a sludge in the bottom of the pipe which breeds bacteria that will produce sulfur and the process of corrosion from inside speeds up.

The first symptom of corrosion is what's called pinhole leaks. A pinhole leak of 2% is not detectable by keystone instruments of leak detection. So if a leak accrues it may not be noticed for months. So if a 2% leak of 485,000 barrels per day leaks for 90 days or before it comes to the surface or someone does not notice it over 400 acres could be contaminated with flooded oil. This floode oil could reach our rivers and steams with rain runoff and fall runoff. You could go a full winter from snow cover and frozen ground before anybody notices it.

A pinhole leak under water in a wetlands will not get noticed unless there is an actual burst in the line. And keystone passes over countless wetlands that drain into lake Ashtabula and the Cheyenne. Pipelines also split along there seams and will fracture under high pressure and this causes high levels of spill. And Keystone oil needs very high pressures to pipe this heavy oil.

Also the keystone pipe thickness is going to be a lot less thinner that what was used in Alaska. So it will take less time to corrode and run a risk of a seam burst.

Let's talk leak detections it offers real time , non stop monitoring along the lines route. When the sensor detects a sharp change in pressure or flow rate it sets off an alarm. Then company personnel conduct additional tests to determine if there actually is a leak.

Alarms can be triggered by non- threatening activities for example buildup in bubbles which generates alarms constantly. What happens in fact some operators get use to constant false alarms, and many times they become dismissive of real leaks. I found a number of examples but just to verify I looked up the Enbrige leak in July of 2010 which discharged more than 1 million gallons of oil into Michigan's Kalamazoo river. They estimated up to 1000 false alarms per month. But keep in mode that leak detection will not send an alarm for a 2% leak.

(If you get 1000 false alarms per month, what happens when you get a real alarm. How do you know the difference). (YOU DON'T)

Although leak detection does work the overwhelming majority of pipeline leaks , spills, ruptures, were discovered by someone near the leaks. Now what does disturb me the most is leak detection through deregulation is not required throughout the pipeline only in environmental areas. This regulation was supported by the GOPTP at the Senate hearings. So leak detection cannot always distinguish between leaks and normal fluctuations.

Now the pipeline is projected to carry 830,000 barrels per day through a 36 inch pipeline. Estimates depending on who you want to listen to varies from 1,500 to 7,000 temporary jobs and up to 100 per infant jobs.

The pipeline will crossover rivers wider than 100 feet. Such as the Missouri, Platte, Niobrara, and 11 others. Can anybody understand what a 2% leak undetected for any amount of time the amount of pollutants will be in these rivers.

Somebody needs to explain to me how a 36 inch pipeline run over 890 miles is going to create 575,000 jobs as John Boehner and Mich McConnell keep telling us. TransCanada the people building this pipeline say a maximum of 4,650 and 100 permanent jobs. Some say in the area of 7,000 temporary jobs. Now originally TransCanada said that all pipe fittings and steel would be manufactured in this country that would have created an additional 2,000 temporary jobs is now going to be imported from Korea. So just using a little common sense 890 miles of 36 inch pipe will take 646 men per mile.

So we build this pipeline across rivers streams, environmental sensitive areas pump it to the Koch Brothers refinery in Texas load it on a barge and sell it on the international market. This has no benefit to this country it makes no sense.

So if the GOPTP is concerned about a few temporary jobs which is stunning to say the least. Why are they blocking the American jobs act and we have tons of roads and bridges in need of repairs that would actually create thousands and thousands of actual good paying jobs. But let's not stand in the way of Boehners stock portfolio and the Koch Brothers machine. This is propaganda at its best. And the Koch brothers are great at fooling the American people after all you don't become one of the richest guys in the world by telling the truth all the time. They are very bright but also very slick.

But it appears that the democrats are going to cave in on this issue and when the OPP bloggers realize the issues around this pipeline was a pipe dream it will be t late. But let's give the GOPTP what they want the voters have told us to back off and give them what they want.
As reported by TransCanada at the senate committee... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 13, 2014 10:24:06   #
vernon
 
tdsrnest wrote:
When will one of you explain how that pipeline will create 575,000 jobs and what is the benifits to this country



where did you come up with that number?
WHERE DID YOU COME UP WITH THAT NUMBER???

Reply
Nov 13, 2014 12:03:17   #
MiamiPhil77
 
Enjoy your $5.00 per gallon gasoline. OK, say your right, please explain to me how wind mills, which have data that supports 500% increase to the consumer for energy( which does not include transportaion, installation nor maintainance) is a viable alternative to oil? Who pays for this? You do as I do. Energy demand is a complecated issue. Your President has made it very difficult for coal fired plants...because....because,,,um...he hates the Koch Brothers and wants us to,lead a world in alternate energy execution at the cost of the consumer. Other high energy use countries think we are stupid and they are right.

Reply
Nov 13, 2014 12:54:09   #
wallstreetgypsy Loc: The Ruins of Troy
 
Do us all a favor: stay "In Hiding"!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.