One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The difference betwen Democrats and Republicans
Page <<first <prev 10 of 32 next> last>>
Sep 4, 2013 15:08:24   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Flyinhoss wrote:
I enjoyed your post, Normsky. I would like the government to get out of administering welfare programs and allow local communities, starting with families, to care for their own. We could reduce the size and reach of government, by eliminating duplicate services, between federal, state, and local agencies, on every level. People need jobs that produce goods & services and it the cost of all the bloated bureaucracy is weighing us all down. Politicians and bureaucrats are all about empire building and enlarging their turf.... well, it's our money, isn't it?
I enjoyed your post, Normsky. I would like the gov... (show quote)


The Federal Bureaucracy, with it's overpaid, underbrained apparatchiks, who merrily churn out mountains of regulations of doubtful legality, but which have the force of law until a judge rules otherwise, is the problem. They are the real problem, with their insistence on "one size fits all (poorly) lame ass, dumb ass solutions.

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:13:15   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
rumitoid wrote:
Separation between church and state was to keep any Christian denomination from taking power. The experiences in Europe of theocracies warring and oppressing each other was to be avoided.


Hogwash

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:13:56   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
Yes there is separation,,, but the wall is toward the Government not the church...


Amen

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2013 15:17:04   #
John Deere
 
4430 wrote:
Hogwash


He also seems to forget that state run Muslim religions were also at war with state run Christian religions in Europe in places like Spain, The Balkins.

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:21:34   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
John Deere wrote:
The democrats came up with this separation of church and state from a letter that was written by Thomas Jefferson while he was president. It was rumored at the time that the US government might set up a state religion, like the British had. This letter was to put those rumors to rest and all it stated was that the US government had no intention of setting up a state religion.


I had to correct my Pastor last Sunday night and set him straight on this very thing !

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:25:47   #
badmikiev
 
MPLSMAN wrote:
Democrats the believers in the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Republicans followers of Ayn Rand.



Democrats = the believers in the Government will take care of you from cradle to grave. (A welfare state)

Republicans = believe if you don't work, you don't eat. The bible teaches this; the believers in the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:27:15   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
The original concept of this post started out with "the difference between democrats and republicans", before all the religious input. The biggest differences are the differences between "conservative" and "liberal" voters, the differences between democrat and republican politicians are minimal.

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2013 15:37:14   #
Ve'hoe
 
rumitoid wrote:
Separation between church and state was to keep any Christian denomination from taking power. The experiences in Europe of theocracies warring and oppressing each other was to be avoided.


No,,, it was to prevent the state from selecting a religion...

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:38:16   #
Ve'hoe
 
bahmer wrote:
But if you are of the communist "democrat" party then the wall is automatically turned against the church as we have seen time and again by the ACLU commonally called the atheist civil liberties union. OIllegal has become even more aggressive against the church in fact he is paralleling Hitler in his adamant disgust of religious people. You those people that cling to their God and their guns.


That's me!! Bibles and guns!!!

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:48:48   #
bahmer
 
Flyinhoss wrote:
I enjoyed your post, Normsky. I would like the government to get out of administering welfare programs and allow local communities, starting with families, to care for their own. We could reduce the size and reach of government, by eliminating duplicate services, between federal, state, and local agencies, on every level. People need jobs that produce goods & services and it the cost of all the bloated bureaucracy is weighing us all down. Politicians and bureaucrats are all about empire building and enlarging their turf.... well, it's our money, isn't it?
I enjoyed your post, Normsky. I would like the gov... (show quote)


Please use the "quote reply" tag under the post or quote that you are replying to as this will help the rest of us know to whom and what you are replying to. Most of us are smart enough to find the quote or at least make an educated guess as to who or what you are responding to be we sometimes get it wrong and embarrass both ourselves and the person we think you were writing to.

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 15:54:03   #
bahmer
 
banjojack wrote:
You realize, of course, that the government has stated they will guarantee loans to minorities for "equal housing" in predominantly white,(read that low crime) neighborhoods? I simply can't wait to see how that flies in lily white Martha's Vineyard.


I thought that program was already well under way in Detroit. We can all see how well that worked out for you boys. We gave you all those nice homes there and now we gotta go in and level them to the ground. What we will do in Martha's Vineyard is find you a high paying job in the local burger joint and put that money in a saving account for you until you can afford that house. Hows that sound black bread?

Reply
 
 
Sep 4, 2013 16:03:24   #
Flyinhoss Loc: Texas
 
bahmer wrote:
Please use the "quote reply" tag under the post or quote that you are replying to as this will help the rest of us know to whom and what you are replying to. Most of us are smart enough to find the quote or at least make an educated guess as to who or what you are responding to be we sometimes get it wrong and embarrass both ourselves and the person we think you were writing to.


Thank you bahmer! I read your same message to another poster, earlier today. I suppose reading instructions is not just for women, eh? ;)

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 16:34:05   #
bahmer
 
Flyinhoss wrote:
Thank you bahmer! I read your same message to another poster, earlier today. I suppose reading instructions is not just for women, eh? ;)


My late wife taught me that on a number of occasions. I was an engineer and I didn't need instructions until it wouldn't go together the way I thought it should but didn't. Then she would smile and hand me the instructions and say maybe the answer is in here. It usually was, just like not using a map and getting lost right?

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 16:42:05   #
Flyinhoss Loc: Texas
 
bahmer wrote:
My late wife taught me that on a number of occasions. I was an engineer and I didn't need instructions until it wouldn't go together the way I thought it should but didn't. Then she would smile and hand me the instructions and say maybe the answer is in here. It usually was, just like not using a map and getting lost right?


Do real men use maps?

Reply
Sep 4, 2013 16:45:29   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Nope! Ray, my husband never used a map but he owned dozens of them. Could never figure out why he had so many, perhaps he studied them in secret so I could not pick on him for being lost.

Flyinhoss wrote:
Do real men use maps?


:lol:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 32 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.