This is crazy
Aug 31, 2013 15:00:25 #
Lou
Loc: Florida
stovepipe wrote:
Why do you doubt that it could happen
Because as we speak there are at minimum 195millions guns in the hands of American Citizens . To date there has been no threat t remove them .
Rumors and wild claims like yours are the reason ammo flew off the shelves TWICE in the past 5 years , out of sheer unfounded paranoia .
Universal background checks are common sense , I see no threat to the 2nd amendment there . As for hi-capacity clips , this is no new legislation , and it doesn't threaten second Amendment rights .
Aug 31, 2013 15:14:01 #
You doubt? Think at one time someone doubted the world was anything but flat.
stovepipe wrote:
Why do you doubt that it could happen
Aug 31, 2013 15:38:37 #
rumitoid wrote:
Maybe I am dense or a wishful thinker but I have re-read this Treaty 3xs and find nothing that even hints at what you say, banjojack. The dire warnings by conservatives about other UN treaties we agreed to never came to pass. Santorum has been quite vocal in damning this treaty and the previous one that was simply copying our evolved standards for the handicapped. Either he is the most duplicitous person on the planet or scarily dumb.
Why should we get involved in a treaty with the UN? this worthless POS organization is supposed to be a police organization for all it's members but in reality is nothing more than socially controlling these members.
Check and see how many member countries have committed genocide against it's people while the UN stood by and did not do a damned thing. Is this an organization we want to grant any type of partnership with? What I can't agree with is getting involved with any worthless world organization that has been proven to be nothing but a corrupt cesspool.
Check out topic: The End of the World, but with USSR National Anthem
Aug 31, 2013 15:45:44 #
Lou wrote:
Just a point of information . When you buy a gun i... (show quote)
You poor poor poor baby. Try seven to eight weeks in the 44th Least Free State!
:!: :hunf:
Aug 31, 2013 15:47:14 #
Correct me if im wrong...but dont guns protect the worthless hides of politcians? Just like obamacare...gun control is not meant for them.Its truly disgusting!!!
Aug 31, 2013 15:51:53 #
.
A few years ago Dianne Feinstein authored a bill that would have taken a large percentage of our guns, but was beat by a narrow margin in the senate. After the vote, she is on record as saying that if she had had the vote, she would have said ,"Mr. and Mrs. gun owner, turn all in.
Now does that sound like we have nothing to worry about?
bmac32 wrote:
You doubt? Think at one time someone doubted the world was anything but flat.
A few years ago Dianne Feinstein authored a bill that would have taken a large percentage of our guns, but was beat by a narrow margin in the senate. After the vote, she is on record as saying that if she had had the vote, she would have said ,"Mr. and Mrs. gun owner, turn all in.
Now does that sound like we have nothing to worry about?
Aug 31, 2013 15:53:46 #
It's not about guns, it's about control, from birth to death.
charger1 wrote:
Correct me if im wrong...but dont guns protect the worthless hides of politcians? Just like obamacare...gun control is not meant for them.Its truly disgusting!!!
Check out topic: What so many do not know....
Aug 31, 2013 16:22:42 #
carolyn wrote:
.
A few years ago Dianne Feinstein authored a bill that would have taken a large percentage of our guns, but was beat by a narrow margin in the senate. After the vote, she is on record as saying that if she had had the vote, she would have said ,"Mr. and Mrs. gun owner, turn all in.
Now does that sound like we have nothing to worry about?
A few years ago Dianne Feinstein authored a bill that would have taken a large percentage of our guns, but was beat by a narrow margin in the senate. After the vote, she is on record as saying that if she had had the vote, she would have said ,"Mr. and Mrs. gun owner, turn all in.
Now does that sound like we have nothing to worry about?
carolyn, please refer to an answer I gave to another of your posts, regarding the Feinstein Bill and my grandpa's old shotgun.
Aug 31, 2013 16:57:58 #
Boo_Boo
Loc: Jellystone
banjojack wrote:
carolyn, please refer to an answer I gave to another of your posts, regarding the Feinstein Bill and my grandpa's old shotgun.
The debate over gun control may soon be a mute point. Obama has two Executive Orders he will sign within the next 10 days addressing gun control. Biden made the announcement on 29 Aug. I can not locate, yet, a copy of the EO. Right now people are saying that import of weapons only pertain to antiques. But, you know as well as I that hidden within EOs are measures that expand control.
Aug 31, 2013 16:58:09 #
Lou
Loc: Florida
carolyn wrote:
Why should we get involved in a treaty with the UN... (show quote)
I can agree with you on that Carolyn , that is your opinion .And if indeed THAT is the reason that you oppose this resolution , which most likely won't get passed anyway as far as the US is concerned , THEN GIVE THAT AS YOUR DAMN REASON INSTEAD OF CREATING A BULLSHIT STORY , OR SPOUTING A BULLSHIT STORY THAT IT THREATENS OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS BECAUSE IT DOES NOT -READ THE DAMN THING.
Aug 31, 2013 17:00:29 #
Lou wrote:
I can agree with you on that Carolyn , that is your opinion .And if indeed THAT is the reason that you oppose this resolution , which most likely won't get passed anyway as far as the US is concerned , THEN GIVE THAT AS YOUR DAMN REASON INSTEAD OF CREATING A BULLSHIT STORY , OR SPOUTING A BULLSHIT STORY THAT IT THREATENS OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS BECAUSE IT DOES NOT -READ THE DAMN THING.
Baby steps, buddy, baby steps.
Aug 31, 2013 17:01:45 #
Boo_Boo
Loc: Jellystone
Lou, I have been trying to get a copy of this, can you give me a link to the UN resolution (proposal). All the places I search are biased (on either direction) and I would like to read it for myself. Many thanks
Lou wrote:
I can agree with you on that Carolyn , that is your opinion .And if indeed THAT is the reason that you oppose this resolution , which most likely won't get passed anyway as far as the US is concerned , THEN GIVE THAT AS YOUR DAMN REASON INSTEAD OF CREATING A BULLSHIT STORY , OR SPOUTING A BULLSHIT STORY THAT IT THREATENS OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS BECAUSE IT DOES NOT -READ THE DAMN THING.
Aug 31, 2013 17:05:05 #
carolyn wrote:
And how many of the 100 permit holders were on the list that committed these violent crimes while standing their ground? There have been many cases that the government has added them to their lists, when in fact they are exempt. That is the whole concept of carrying concealed. If someone comes up to you and tries to take your wallet by force, or threatens you or your family,then you blow his arse away. PERIOD!
nd how many of the 100 permit holders were on the list that committed these violent crimes while standing their ground?
I would have to guess 99, or maybe even 100. Because if you are going to commit a crime, would you have a permit to do it.
Aug 31, 2013 17:08:37 #
Lou
Loc: Florida
No problem ginnyt here is the full text .
http://www.scribd.com/doc/145792803/UN-Small-Arms-Treaty-Text-As-Adopted
Please read the preamble as it qualifies all statements that follow .
http://www.scribd.com/doc/145792803/UN-Small-Arms-Treaty-Text-As-Adopted
Please read the preamble as it qualifies all statements that follow .
Aug 31, 2013 17:13:13 #
Old_Gringo wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.