straightUp wrote:
She doesn't care for the term "butt fucking" but she has no problem calling someone a prick - LOL
Steve - I'm glad you don't have any animosity toward gays... I don't either, but your opinion on marriage is a personal one and it really doesn't mean anything to people like me. Now... why would I want to add more authoritarian laws to the government based on your personal opinions?
My wife and I have been married for 31 years and I'm sorry but gay people getting married isn't taking anything away from us. I pity the marriage that is so weak that it can be threatened by gay people you don't even know getting married. I can't even imagine.
She doesn't care for the term "butt fucking&q... (
show quote)
Perhaps a wider outlook on history might help
"Most societies throughout history, even the wealthiest and mightiest, have eventually collapsed and died. Why
Why don't they just continue to evolve and flourish as their knowledge and technology grow? What allows some cultures to continually bloom, and others to wither?
This question-normally one of mere historical and academic concern-is increasingly relevant to to millions of Americans as they behold their beloved nation struggling in the grip of unprecedented financial, political, cultural and moral conflict. Indeed, many are warning that American is not immune to the forces and influences that have caused other great empires to self destruct.
In particular, traditional-minded voices point to America's rapid growth of homosexuality- not only in its prevalence, but in its virtual celebration-as eerily reminiscent of Sodom and Gomorrah, the ancient cities whose destruction due to rampant immorality is described in the Old Testament of the Bible.
From the time of this nation's founding all the way up until the current era, mainstream Americans held the Bible to be their ultimate guidebook, and the "Judeo-Christian values" it espoused as their highest principles.
Today, however, especially throughout the elite realms of academia, science, government and the news and entertainment media- the Bible on longer retains the stature and universal credibility it once did. In its place we listen to sociologists, scientists and other "experts"
Sex and Culture
Perhaps the definitive work on the rise and fall of civilizations was published in 1934 by Oxford anthropologist .D. Unwin. In "sex and culture" Unwin studied 86 human civilizations ranging from the tiny South Seas island principalities to mighty Rome. He found a society's destiny is linked inseparably to the limits it imposes on sexual expression and that those sexual constraints correlate directly to its theological sophistication and religious commitment.
Unwin noted that the most primitive societies had only rudimentary spiritual beliefs and virtually no restrictions on sexual expression, whereas societies with more sophisticated theologies placed higher restrictions on sexual expression and achieved greater social development.
In particular cultures that adopt what Unwin dubbed "absolute monogamy" proved to be the most vigorous, economically productive, artistically creative, scientifically innovative and geographically expansive societies on earth.
Absolute monogamy is a very strict moral code. Under absolute monogamy, sex can occur only within one man-one woman marriage' Premarital and extramarital sex are not tolerated, and divorce is prohibited.
Understandably, the only societies that practice absolute monogamy are the ones that take their religion very seriously Whether monotheistic or polytheistic, they believe devoutly in God or gods, and they order their society according to divine moral laws.
Unwin's contemporary Arnold Toynbee, was much more explicit bout the centrality of religion in history Toynbee's masterpiece, his 12 volume "study of history" charted the rise and fall of 26 civilizations. In Toynbee's view "the course of human history consists of a series of encounters...in which each man, woman or child... is challenged by God to make the free choice between God's will and refusing to do it."
Why exactly does absolute monogamy bring vitality to a society? According to anthropologist Margaret Mead the central problem of every society is the appropriate roles for men. Monogamous societies require men to choose either lifelong celibacy or responsibilities of a family, fidelity, bread winning and fatherhood" these are stablising choices.
Heyak in his Why Nations Fail said the two main forces toward decline were collectivist governments and unstable family and community groups. (primary article by Brian Fitzpatrick November 2010)
So when you state that what people do in their personal lives is none of your business, think again. It most assuredly does in significant ways that you are not even aware of.