oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

You do know that Trey will get to use his tough questions on Hillary Clinton, sooner or later, don't you? Yep, he has the power of subpoena and she can't avoid that when it comes up. She didn't appear on but one committee hearing, and that was with the Senate where the Dems determined what could be asked and about all she said there was, "At this point, what difference does it make". She tried to hide behind those words and got by with it but Gowdy won't allow crap like that.

You really don't realize the difference in this hearing and the ones that have taken place prior to it, do you?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I've seen Hillary's comment "At this point, what difference does it make" taken out of context so much, like Obamas "you didn't build that" comment. It cost the republicans the election. Do you know what she meant by it? And yes, its pretty clear the difference in this hearing and the last one. Gowdy will get to lecture Clinton adn don't you know she'll be ready for it? But hey, it should be entertaining.

Retired669

Good question that I have asked a number of times. When you start pissing people off by trying to force them to another goddamn waste of time hearing your not likely to get any cooperation from them. There isn't a question about Benghazi that has been answered a number of times. Some idiots refuse to listen unless you tell them what they want to hear. I believe everyone that is subpoenaed should ignore it and send them a F**k you note....:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

I certainly couldn't blame them if they did.

3jack

Unlike you and the rest of your back slapping buddies, I am not seeking the approval of anyone. I speak my mind, I am my own person and I don't need to be reassured of my beliefs or my thinking. It is idiots like you who need to hear the praise or see the "thumbs up" signs of like minded mental midgets just to think you might have a purpose on this earth. Actually, the only purpose that you and your ilk have is to validate the fact that hate and stupidity is alive and well in the USA.

RETW Loc: Washington

Oh, did the little girly-man get his dander up.
“Actually, the only purpose that you and your ilk have is to validate the fact that hate and stupidity is alive and well in the USA”.

That statement, you stupid ass, fits around your neck, very well.

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

RETW Loc: Washington

It is for certain, something went wrong. Four good men lost there life.

You say there have been many hearings.
Your right of course, so why is it no one has come up with the reason it went wrong? Why is it no one has been found to be responsible for what happened?
Is it your answer, the bad guys?

Who was supposed to keep that Embassy safe? Who’s job was it to make sure our Embassy Had sufficient protection?

Who gave the order to stand down when some of our troops wanted to go to the aid of the Embassy? Because we now all know, there was an order to stand down.

If all the questions have been answered, then way hasn’t some one been found to be the blame for this disaster?


Who ignored the suggestions of the Innman Commission, that sets clear goals on how to, and what to do, to protect our Embassy’s ?

The same Commission that flatly states. It is the direct responsibility of the Secretary Of State that has the full and
complete responsibility to protect and defend our Embassy’s around the world.

That would be your girl Clinton.



Have any of these questions been answered? (( NOPE ))

And than there is you. Talking points in hand, following along with the sheep.

So tell me. If you believe all has been answered, who was responsible for this
Disaster?

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Wasnt the Inmann commision statement made in 1990?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Wasnt the Inmann commision statement made in 1990?

3jack

it seems that I struck a nerve with you, which doesn't surprise me, in that you validate my post.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

By the way, we know of an alleged order to "stand down" from some guy known as "Bob", I think it was, alleged by some dudes who have waited until now to use the publicity to promote a book about it where they allege the "stand down" order from "Bob". This is even worse than politicizing the attack and the deaths; they are going to profit from it. And Fox is just lapping it up as are the ultraconservative anti-Obamites.

And actually, the Inmann report was from all the way back dto the 1980's. If that's taken to be the authority, then lets take these attacks in chronological order and get the Sec of States from the Bush regime to answer for their crimes first. And I'll bet not a single democrat will flinch about it nor will they profit by it.

RETW Loc: Washington

Yes it was. And the recommendations made by the ARB
then. Are the mirror image of what they are now. So there were guide lines to follow.

Near 25 years of them. Clinton new this.

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

RETW Loc: Washington

Hey jack ass. That statement comes frome you, a post or two back. Those are your own words fool. Hows that for validation.

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

3jack

My post stated that the only purpose in this world for you and your ilk is to validate that hate and stupidity is alive and well in the USA.....again, you validate my post.

Retired669

Yes him and the rest prove it all the time Jack...Eager little beavers ain't they? :lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup: