Glaucon wrote:
It seems you want some kind of conflict with me. I wrote a lengthy response and answered all the questions. Your response didn't mention any of the points I made and you did respond to one I didn't make. I don't care if you are snarky. If that gets you a peak experience, I think you should get it anyway you can. What difference does it make to you what I publish or how? The kinds of issues I write about do not lend themselves to self publishing so, if that is a question, the answer is, no. Why do you need to be snarky?
It seems you want some kind of conflict with me. ... (
show quote)
I don't like you and what you claim you stand for that is why I was snaky.
Here is the questions in the thread you did not answer.
Such as: define and show your source to prove the slanderous points you bring up about me and others stupid, bigot,
Vrooman, You are one determined bigot and num num's like you are destroying my country. Your supply of misinformation and your defective thinking skills make you one very dangerous head case.
Glaucon, it seems that you must slander instead of refute item by item as I asked. What in particular can you identify as bigotry please be specific.
Numnums like me are destroying your country. Again I find that personal and slanderous. Nothing factual.
Please identify the misinformation. Specifically. I would also like to have you identify defective thinking skills then you become slanderous again.
Again you go for slander. You asked the questions. Tassine answered in detail and supported her thought with well thought out words. You did not need to do anything, The effective communication had happened in writing. this was not a verbal "tell" situation. Many of the statement you wrote had no basis in fact as you can not identify what you wrote in what Tassine said.
Please identify the 'Hate Juices" I demonstrated. Tassine is not on line to challenge you. I'm sure it is not intelligence or courage that Tassine is lacking.
PM's are the place to address an individual. If you put it out there publicly, I may answer.
You bring up anger (unable to identify the specifics) courage, genitalia and slander two people.
I didn't set the rules for this thread. You did and are not keeping them
Dear stupid black people was the term I copied I did not originate it. You however, left off the Dear. Out of context again. I did however point out several issues that indicate the lack of the use their intelligence. As every item is a product of some research by responsible agencies I repeated them. Therefore, it does not indicate either of your allegations of racist/bigoted are my personal beliefs.
We are in different time zones. This is another attempt to discredit me. Stay on task. I have no conflict with you. I take exception to the things you say that are unsupported by facts.
Then your refusal to defend your allegations item by item and attempt to put the responsibility onto me to cover your inability to defend or debate your irresponsible posts when challenged.
Again stay on task; this has nothing to do with flapping my arms to fly. I'm sure there is a true conservative that could address you statement about my part in the thread we are contesting.
I am an independent, so I do not adhere to a part line.
Glaucon wrote:
"Stupid black people" would lead some liberals to believe you are racist/bigoted.
Your being up at 3:30 am suggests you have some personal problems and that all this conflict you are trying to have with me is merely a distraction from them.
I cannot prove you are unable to wave your arms and fly, that you are not a child molester, that you are a right wing head case. It is very difficult and sometimes impossible to prove a negative. I think true conservatives would see clearly that you have some thinking deficits implicit in your comments and that you rely on many factoids to support your thinking deficits.
How is that? Is that your opinion? Can you substantiate your assertion?
I find you never seem to reply when asked to do so item for item. When I challenge you your replies do not address the challenge.
What make Loki and I bigoted. Please be factual.
Glaucon wrote:
I am not sure you and Locus are unaware of your bigotry, but bigotry it is.
It is not good to challenge people, it is much more productive to merely ask them. Are you able to see that using the word, challenge, is what one would do if they were being bigoted.
You need to know what the meanings of the words you use. Look up the word, slander.
You say you chose (close?) love, peace, harmony and prayer and turned immediately to suggestions of violence. That seems like a very mixed message or expression of your feelings. Praise the lord and pass the ammunition is a prayer and song from WWII.
No, a challenge has nothing to do with bigotry.
As is the case with this post you state Loki and I are bigoted because we post information that is true and negative about "black or people of color".
When a group of people do something that is proven to be of that group then that is not racist or bigotry.
When I challenge you to answer my responses to your slanderous and erroneous posts. That is not bigoted. I have Wikipedia's response to my interrogation regarding your statement.
So, respond to the challenge item by item or you have accepted defeat by being unable, not wanting to because of many reasons such as cowardice (I am not accusing you), intimidated by a superior intellect, there could be many reasons.
Not answering a challenge that you instigated.
You wrote it, I read it, it stimulated a response. So, who is the original challenger? Wikipedia says it is you.
GLAUCON'S RESOPNSE
You obviously had no interest whatsoever in even trying to understand what I commented and what I intended. Your obvious reason in responding to me was to attempt to prove your views and opinions are right and true and to prove that mine were wrong and untrue and that there is no middle ground to even be sought. If your overwhelming need is to prove yourself right and a purveyor of the truth, lets say you have done that and that you have won the game. It is impossible to learn anything when you believe you already know everything.
You are the word smith. Dont write ambiguous phrases and sentences and you wont be misunderstood. You were not. You slander, lie, refuse to answer, obfuscate, so when you challenge me that I dont understand slander, bigotry. I look them up and again prove you the critic of everyone elses spelling, language, usage. You place the bar high and cant get over it.