Aren't you the one who insulted someone earlier for parroting? You said, "but all he ever does is parrot what he reads." So, in your very next post, you wind up doing the same thing. Actually it's worse, you don't even write the words you just post links, as if that means something.
Let me explain how stupid it is to simply post links. For one, I can't even read the Bloomberg article because there's a pay wall and I'm not going to pay for yet another subscription just to read something you linked to.
Secondly, you fail to point out any smoking guns in either article. The Washington Times article says the main culprit of inflation is government spending, but it doesn't explain how. Just that it is. And to enforce this baseless assumption, the author states that this is the opinion of economists, but when I look for sources, I noticed the isn't any. He doesn't actually mention ANY economists at all. He simply says that "many economists say".
Well there are thousands and thousands of economists who all disagree with each other and most of them are idiots anyway.
So where does that leave us?
I know where it leaves me... brimming with confidence that government spending is NOT the main culprit and that Biden is correct in blaming corporate greed for at least some of it and that the Washington Times is a hack.
All you have to do is look at the total sum of public debt (often referred to as the national debt) and compare that to the total sum of private debt because both these sources of debt pump money into our economy, thereby affecting inflation.
In 2022 the national debt was at $31.42 trillion but private debt added up to $62.08 trillion, about twice as much. So we can already debunk the claim that government spending is "the main culprit" with very simple math.
"some economists say"... lol -what a hack.
Even if it were... the national debt is the accumulation of deficits concurrent with many presidents including Trump. Have a look at this jelly bean...
Nevermind the future years... this chart was used to support a forecast of the effects of extending Trump's tax cuts. But the years leading up to now show us that the biggest deficit was in 2020, during the pandemic and it was the result of record government spending that year and guess who was still in office?
So, unless you want me to keep shooting holes through your narrative, I would either come up with a real solid argument or just stop. And don't just pull headlines out of the box either, obviously, I can shoot holes through crackpot journalism too.