Will Elections Finally Be Secure and Honest in 2024?
Apr 6, 2024 13:54:53 #
LostAggie66 wrote:
I only watch Fox for Sports and Sunday Night Cartoons on "Animation Domination". I watched Fox News one time and will NEVER AGain. Big3+ PBS are my news outlets on TV + local newspaper and maybe an occasional Sunday from San Antonio or Houston.
I only watch Fox for Sports and Sunday Night Cartoons on "Animation Domination". I watched Fox News one time and will NEVER AGain. Big3+ PBS are my news outlets on TV + local newspaper and maybe an occasional Sunday from San Antonio or Houston.LostAggie66; Dedicated ignorance is hard to overcome. But give information and facts a try!
Apr 6, 2024 14:26:41 #
padremike wrote:
So do I but I wouldn't even disrespect fish guts by wrapping them in the NY Times and tossing them in the garbage and NBC is just as much part of the DNC State Controlled Marxist Media Propaganda Bureau's as CNN & MSNBC. If you're not watching Mark Levine on FOX, Saturday & Sunday @ 8:00 PM Eastern, you're missing one of the most informative programs on TV.
I love his show. It repeats the show late at night so I get to watch it when I get home. I find out all sorts of stuff. Of course, there are some things I don't agree with but for the most part, it's pretty informative.
Editited to say, I like Bongino too
Apr 6, 2024 15:53:18 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
eagleye13 wrote:
LostAggie66; Dedicated ignorance is hard to overcome. But give information and facts a try!
Eagleye13; You should know it's hard to overcome. You have yet to do so. Give information and facts a try
Apr 6, 2024 18:30:41 #
microphor
Loc: Home is TN
slatten49 wrote:
Tom, I believe your 'gut' to be right. Too many on the right accept elections as being fair and secure only when they win. In their way of thinking, losing automatically has them assuming that the election was rigged. 
Democrats from Hillary Clinton to Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams and dozens of congressional lawmakers have a decadeslong history of objecting to state and federal election results and have attempted to block every Republican presidential winner since 2000.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2023/08/21/the_democrats_long_history_of_objecting_to_election_results_605910.html
Apr 6, 2024 18:33:47 #
microphor
Loc: Home is TN
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
All thanks to Donald Trump 
ahahahahaha, ahahahahaha, have you been dead the last quarter of a century. All kinds of election denying going on!
Apr 6, 2024 18:40:55 #
microphor
Loc: Home is TN
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
He was the very loudest and started calling fake election for months before hand knowing he was going to lose . That is why he is on the spot for it now . and why January 6th happened .
Was it Trumps fought when he had to be moved to a bunker in the whitehouse while in office. Was that the right tearing through the fences and security agents? ahahahahahah, I'll take you serious when you come to debate with clean hands.
Apr 6, 2024 18:42:34 #
microphor wrote:
Was it Trumps fought when he had to be moved to a bunker in the whitehouse while in office. Was that the right tearing through the fences and security agents? ahahahahahah, I'll take you serious when you come to debate with clean hands.
Was it conservative Trump supporters who attempted to burn down historic St. John’s Church? I think not,
Apr 6, 2024 19:38:46 #
XXX wrote:
The truth is out! They have been proven hackable.https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/halderman-hacked-a-dominion-tabulator-in-front-of-us-district-judge-using-only-a-pen/111972475/
This happened after fox payed up. Too bad you don't know the latest but they ARE hackable.
This happened after fox payed up. Too bad you don't know the latest but they ARE hackable.
Time is the ultimate arbiter.
Apr 6, 2024 19:43:19 #
Apr 6, 2024 19:48:54 #
AuntiE wrote:
I think the issue is the potential for misuse of a mail in ballot. It would be very easy to fill out a ballot, using the deceased name, and mailing it in. Even one fifth of 26,000 could alter the outcome of an election.
As you seem so gullible, why would the Secretary of State refuse to remove these names? What purpose does it serve her to retain the names in the voter rolls?
As you seem so gullible, why would the Secretary of State refuse to remove these names? What purpose does it serve her to retain the names in the voter rolls?
The voters who were caught voting for dead relatives were caught when the signatures on the mail in ballot were checked against those on record. No system is perfect but the one that we're using actually works quite well.
I can't imaging why the voter rolls weren't purged of dead people. It did not seem to have any affect on the vote, though.
Apr 6, 2024 19:50:34 #
AuntiE wrote:
His Assistant Secretary of Defense has clearly stated Trump brought up the use of the National Guard. Even the WaPo posted that story.
Then the Assistant Secretary of Defense is lying. He is, after all, an appointment of Fat Donny the Liar.
Apr 6, 2024 20:05:51 #
XXX wrote:
And don't forget the democrat in jail for voter fraud! https://www.wpr.org/news/jury-former-milwaukee-election-official-guilty-election-fraud-zapata
I read a number of articles on the case and judged her actions to be really stupid and showed a shameful lack of understanding of the workings of election law in Wisconsin. A five year sentence is a bit harsh in my opinion but it should not go unpunished. I was surprise to have not found any notes mentioning her political affiliation.
Apr 6, 2024 20:08:52 #
billlingle wrote:
Then the Assistant Secretary of Defense is lying. He is, after all, an appointment of Fat Donny the Liar.
You were present at the meeting and can attest to your statement?
FYI, he may have been the choice of the SecDef and not personally connected to Trump. It would behoove you to learn how such appointments may come about. I understand the word learn is an anathema to your ilk; however, maybe test it for a brief while.
Apr 6, 2024 20:09:19 #
AuntiE wrote:
I do not dismiss it.
On the face, it is accurate. What many ignore is he did, in fact, sit in the Pentagon and bring up the possibility of deploying the National Guard. There is a transcribed copy of that conversation. It is a fact someone, at the Pentagon, contacted the DC Mayor as to whether she wanted troops deployed and she declined.
On the face, it is accurate. What many ignore is he did, in fact, sit in the Pentagon and bring up the possibility of deploying the National Guard. There is a transcribed copy of that conversation. It is a fact someone, at the Pentagon, contacted the DC Mayor as to whether she wanted troops deployed and she declined.
Where is there a copy of the transcript that you describe?
Apr 6, 2024 20:10:36 #
billlingle wrote:
Where is there a copy of the transcript that you describe?
At one point, WaPo had it online.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.