One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Will Elections Finally Be Secure and Honest in 2024?
Page <<first <prev 9 of 15 next> last>>
Apr 5, 2024 18:27:36   #
Lily
 
AuntiE wrote:
Your cult is so threatened by the most watched news media in the US. One wonders if you have the cognitive ability to understand there is a difference between their news division and opinion division.

I, actually, pity your mother-in-law having to live with you and your possible attempted brain washing of an elder.


Why do you waste your time on someone so gutless and full of Trump hate he won’t say Rick Wilson’s call for Trump’s murder is wrong?

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 18:29:34   #
2quick4u Loc: Somewhere in central Tx...
 
padremike wrote:
We currently have a government controlled by Democrats who have no fear of the people and does anything they want. If you have any brains you know where that's going.


I think there is a better way describe our adversaries. The cesspool we used to call washington is currently controlled by a bunch of swamp rats.. which obviously includes most all dimocrats reps, quite a few rinos [reps], and all their crooked friends/associates (who they have appointed to run all govt agencies and bureaus).. who have no fear of the people and does anything they want.

LGB

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 18:30:36   #
Radiance3
 
billlingle wrote:
Faux Snooze said that they held the same position that you are now spouting. It cost them $787,500,000 because with all their money and all their lawyers they were completely unable to convince a court that it was true. They are currently fighting a similar battle with Smartmatic, another voting machine that they slandered. Fat Donny lost by 7,000,000+ votes. It's a shame that you don't have huge amounts of money to give away on court settlements. Otherwise you could make your same nonsensical arguments and actually claim to be the loser yourself.
Faux Snooze said that they held the same position ... (show quote)

=================
You are so dumb, and not worth of my response!

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2024 18:33:31   #
Lily
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
You are so dumb, and not worth of my response!


I think dumb is to generous an adjective.

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 18:50:50   #
PeterS
 
delete

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:00:31   #
PeterS
 
AuntiE wrote:
His Assistant Secretary of Defense has clearly stated Trump brought up the use of the National Guard. Even the WaPo posted that story.

Then why wasn't it called in long before it was? If you opened the Knightlady's link it gave a true accounting of what happened and who was in charge. Pelosi is only in charge of the House...not both sides. She's not even in charge of security but this is done by a board comprised of both sides Only the President can authorize the use of the Guard or delegate its use and no such delegation was ever given to Nancy Pelosi.

If one of your peers gives you a link that they verify as true why wouldn't you read it?

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:01:46   #
Knightlady
 
billlingle wrote:
Are you actually trying to equate a book that was written to discuss/divulge what took place from the author's viewpoint with 61 court cases and a failed coup against the government of he United States and that was responsible for 5 deaths and over $1,000,000 in damages to the capital. If you recall, it also ended in a federal felony indictment with four charged felonies.

Quite a comparison.


No. It was just an article of some of the beefs Hillary had about her loss. I'm not all defending 1/6. It never should have happened. It's the Why the questions are now being answered. It's really a shame that those records from that committee can't be found.
Those that committed actual crimes, should be charged. Hell, they're still looking for a person to charge him with trespassing. Bring him to justice.

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2024 19:09:58   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
XXX wrote:
I don't see what others get out of fox. I don't use it unless I search for something and they have an article. NBC or NYT for me.


That makes you about as sharp as a marble.

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:19:56   #
LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
 
Knightlady wrote:
No. It was just an article of some of the beefs Hillary had about her loss. I'm not all defending 1/6. It never should have happened. It's the Why the questions are now being answered. It's really a shame that those records from that committee can't be found.
Those that committed actual crimes, should be charged. Hell, they're still looking for a person to charge him with trespassing. Bring him to justice.


I agree with you MsKnightLady Jan6 Should have never happened. Both sides did things that should not have been done and it was at least a riot that got out of control. As for it being an insurrection, falseflag or anyother description it was a Riot that got out of control. The rest we may never know the truth.

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:31:36   #
PeterS
 
AuntiE wrote:
Your cult is so threatened by the most watched news media in the US. One wonders if you have the cognitive ability to understand there is a difference between their news division and opinion division.

I, actually, pity your mother-in-law having to live with you and your possible attempted brain washing of an elder.

She was a guest in my house. Neither my wife nor I had a single conversation about politics. I was given a 5% chance to survive. We had more important things on our minds. And for that matter, I've never even talked politics with any of my relatives unless they were the ones who initiated it. My mother-in-law went home only after we hired a live-in nurse and she was satisfied with my care...she had been a nurse for a doctor for 20 years.

And this is something you need to understand. This is a political message board. This is a forum to speak about politics. This is where I talk politics except with my wife. I and non-violent, have no guns, and try to keep the peace with my neighbors, relatives, employees, business associates, clients, etc.

As for brainwashing in general. Fox came into being for the sole purpose of telling conservatives what they want to hear. Which side is going to be more prone to propaganda and brainwashing...news organization(s) dedicated to one ideology or those that rely on one or more ideologies for their customer base? Fox is dedicated to conservatives only and is therefore subjective. When you only hear a subjective point of view, yours, you will never know if something is true or false...unless you objectively dig and verify it yourself. And how can you be objective when you are used to only hearing views that agree with yours...

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:40:38   #
Knightlady
 
AuntiE wrote:
His Assistant Secretary of Defense has clearly stated Trump brought up the use of the National Guard. Even the WaPo posted that story.


I was just posting that I was incorrect in the statement I posted. I read a few articles regarding who did and could do what and found out a few things I didn't know or have forgotten.
I just posted one of the articles to show where I was incorrect in my statement.

I do believe that the NG was brought up, but that wasn't part of my statement, which was Pelosi, and what's his name turned down the NG. Did she dictate it to the powers that be to turn it down, (shrug).

Reply
 
 
Apr 5, 2024 19:47:15   #
XXX Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
 
padremike wrote:
That makes you about as sharp as a marble.


Newsmax is what I use the most.

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:47:20   #
Knightlady
 
LostAggie66 wrote:
I agree with you MsKnightLady Jan6 Should have never happened. Both sides did things that should not have been done and it was at least a riot that got out of control. As for it being an insurrection, falseflag or anyother description it was a Riot that got out of control. The rest we may never know the truth.



Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:51:17   #
PeterS
 
AuntiE wrote:
Your cult is so threatened by the most watched news media in the US. One wonders if you have the cognitive ability to understand there is a difference between their news division and opinion division.

I, actually, pity your mother-in-law having to live with you and your possible attempted brain washing of an elder.


1) If you don't watch Fox and only rely on the newspaper delivered to your door then how do you know how 'news' and 'opinion' are divided on Fox?
2) Since Fox settled a massive lawsuit with Dominion wouldn't it be safe to say that there is no separation between the two sides?
3) Fox is the largest newscast on cable but much smaller than the Big Three who tend to be objective.

Reply
Apr 5, 2024 19:53:35   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
PeterS wrote:
She was a guest in my house. Neither my wife nor I had a single conversation about politics. I was given a 5% chance to survive. We had more important things on our minds. And for that matter, I've never even talked politics with any of my relatives unless they were the ones who initiated it. My mother-in-law went home only after we hired a live-in nurse and she was satisfied with my care...she had been a nurse for a doctor for 20 years.


As in past years, we have dealt with multiple serious family illnesses I understand how much it takes to handle such matters. You and your wife are to be commended for opening your home as opposed to ‘dumping’ her, as many families do, into a facility. More and more they are nothing more than warehousing of the elderly.

Quote:
And this is something you need to understand. This is a political message board. This is a forum to speak about politics. This is where I talk politics except with my wife. I and non-violent, have no guns, and try to keep the peace with my neighbors, relatives, employees, business associates, clients, etc.


Thank you so much for explaining what this was. To think for 10 years I was unaware of such.

Quote:
As for brainwashing in general. Fox came into being for the sole purpose of telling conservatives what they want to hear. Which side is going to be more prone to propaganda and brainwashing...news organization(s) dedicated to one ideology or those that rely on one or more ideologies for their customer base? Fox is dedicated to conservatives only and is therefore subjective. When you only hear a subjective point of view, yours, you will never know if something is true or false...unless you objectively dig and verify it yourself. And how can you be objective when you are used to only hearing views that agree with yours...
As for brainwashing in general. Fox came into bein... (show quote)


One can hardly call Brett Baier and other news anchors conservative. My reading has shown he is very prone to calling out both sides.

If you think about it (ha ha), you would realize there have been no true “journalist” since Tim Russert’s passing. In the past, the standards for a report were; who, what, where and when. No where was the question why applicable unless the person reporting had directly spoken with the person committing an act. Nowadays, these teleprompter readers expound on the why when they know absolutely nothing about it. It is nothing but their opinion, which is not journalism. Anderson Cooper, Hannity, et al know absolutely nothing about the why. They need to shut the hades up. Basically, they are telling people what to think, and people are too bloody lazy to actually do their own research.

My best example of what I am saying is two examples. First, I copied exactly from the House Federal Register and was told I was wrong and MSNC opinion was provided. Next up was a direct copy of a SCOTUS decision. Again, I was wrong because MSNBC said something else. I am trying to determine when MSNBC became members of the House or SCOTUS. I do not do five minute sound bites. I slog through information.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.