One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Another insurrection
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jan 1, 2024 23:55:46   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
bggamers wrote:
They've been making threats to stack the deck IN THE SUPREME COURT to watch their every move dictate how they live ,shit load of you cant do and on and on that while they do they same thing. this playing king of the hill with our government is getting really old. WHEN Trump get's back in the white house he needs to purge the government of pretty much anybody that doesnt like this country help them move their butts to a blue state and then divorce these people. They want a liberal shit hole fine let them have one just not in our country let them have one of their own (NO MORE ARGUING)
They've been making threats to stack the deck IN T... (show quote)


Give em west of I-5, making sure they take all of frisco and the La basin

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 07:22:40   #
Big dog
 
bggamers wrote:
They've been making threats to stack the deck IN THE SUPREME COURT to watch their every move dictate how they live ,shit load of you cant do and on and on that while they do they same thing. this playing king of the hill with our government is getting really old. WHEN Trump get's back in the white house he needs to purge the government of pretty much anybody that doesnt like this country help them move their butts to a blue state and then divorce these people. They want a liberal shit hole fine let them have one just not in our country let them have one of their own (NO MORE ARGUING)
They've been making threats to stack the deck IN T... (show quote)


Amen

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 08:10:12   #
kittibob
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
When will they ask for liberal judges with a conflict of interest to recuse themselves?


When they have a conflict of interest

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2024 09:25:03   #
Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA
 
Milosia2 wrote:
We do have an Ethics Committee .
Sadly it is staffed by so called republicans who really have No Ethics ,
Nor even where to look for them .
Thomas and his wife should be in JAIL !
For ethics violations.
Grift , theft , and overall Slimeyness !!!!!!
Who should be going into Court already knowing the outcome ?????
This goes against the purpose of having
a “supreme” court .
Is this Supreme Court itself
Above The Law ?


Methinks thou art a RACIST!
You dislike SCOTUS Justice Thomas because he is black!

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 09:25:54   #
Jim0001 Loc: originally from Tennessee, now Virginia, USA
 
Marty 2020 wrote:
Give em west of I-5, making sure they take all of frisco and the La basin


Give them everything west of the San Andreas fault line!!!!!

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 09:37:22   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Jim0001 wrote:
Give them everything west of the San Andreas fault line!!!!!


👍👍👍

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 12:59:20   #
F.D.R.
 
Big dog wrote:
This time it’s strictly a Democrat affair.
Dem Rep Jamie Raskin says that Supreme Court Judge Clarence Thomas “Absolutely should recuse himself” in regards to Donald Trump. Then he made this statement, “The question is what should we do if he doesn’t “.
That sure sounds like a threat against the Supreme Court, The final word in everything in regards to our nation.
Who is this jerk to suggest that he and/or his ilk have ANYTHING to say against the Supreme Court and its Justices ? Sounds like he wants to usurp the authority of our government.
This time it’s strictly a Democrat affair. br Dem ... (show quote)


They'll blame the remarks as harmless due to the fact that Rep Raskin is stupid. And they'll get away with it.

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2024 13:35:04   #
Fedup Veteran Loc: Bushnell, FL
 
pegw wrote:
Thomas's wife participated in Trump's effort to stay in power after he lost. Thomas is married to her, and should recuse himself in regards to Trump if he was honest. However, Thomas is on the take and is not honest. We really need to do something about his digressions. His behavior is unacceptable. If he served in a lower court, he would be in prison. Not a threat. What about all the people who Trump got into the Supreme Court? They should recuse themselves too, if they are honest.


Because he appointed them is NOT a reason to recuse, however everyone has an opinion even if they are partisan. So tired of the lies and disinformation that continues to come from the left. I wonder if the ordinary people supporting the left will ever wake up?

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 14:42:58   #
LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)
 
Fedup Veteran wrote:
Because he appointed them is NOT a reason to recuse, however everyone has an opinion even if they are partisan. So tired of the lies and disinformation that continues to come from the left. I wonder if the ordinary people supporting the left will ever wake up?


Fedup there is a small group of us that already are awake. If ethics violations have occurred by any member of SCOTUS then they should be investigated and appropriate action taken regardless of whether they are conservative or liberal. SCOTUS is supposed to be the arbitrators of last resort. Did Democratic presidents make mistakes in choosing justices in recent years? I don't know. Did Republican presidents make mistakes in their SCOTUS Choices again I don't know. Right now the court is strongly conservative and finds for recent cases 6-3 I think. I don't know if expanding the court is a good idea at present. I do think there should be term limits for both SCOTUS and Congress besides elections but that is just my opinion.

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 16:39:24   #
Cornflakes Loc: Texas
 
LostAggie66 wrote:
Fedup there is a small group of us that already are awake. If ethics violations have occurred by any member of SCOTUS then they should be investigated and appropriate action taken regardless of whether they are conservative or liberal. SCOTUS is supposed to be the arbitrators of last resort. Did Democratic presidents make mistakes in choosing justices in recent years? I don't know. Did Republican presidents make mistakes in their SCOTUS Choices again I don't know. Right now the court is strongly conservative and finds for recent cases 6-3 I think. I don't know if expanding the court is a good idea at present. I do think there should be term limits for both SCOTUS and Congress besides elections but that is just my opinion.
Fedup there is a small group of us that already ar... (show quote)


Here’s how to get parity in the Supreme Court, every six years have a special election of six justices (include all the sitting judges plus six new faces from each established party including the independents) when there is a consensus on the top six, the remaining 3 justices will vet the candidates and then decide if they’re qualified for the position-their findings would be sent to a select panel of the Senate with the Vice President as the chairman who will then allow the President to make appointments. This would take an amendment to the constitution, but it’s worth the trouble as it would build a stronger court that is above reproach and develop a pool of well qualified justices 🤠

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 17:01:06   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Cornflakes wrote:
Here’s how to get parity in the Supreme Court, every six years have a special election of six justices (include all the sitting judges plus six new faces from each established party including the independents) when there is a consensus on the top six, the remaining 3 justices will vet the candidates and then decide if they’re qualified for the position-their findings would be sent to a select panel of the Senate with the Vice President as the chairman who will then allow the President to make appointments. This would take an amendment to the constitution, but it’s worth the trouble as it would build a stronger court that is above reproach and develop a pool of well qualified justices 🤠
Here’s how to get parity in the Supreme Court, eve... (show quote)

Too much power to 3 people, reduced to 3 every 6 would make more people accountable 🤷‍♂️

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2024 17:08:03   #
ed4short Loc: New Hampshire
 
Milosia is not real, her name is actually George Soros

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 17:22:41   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
ed4short wrote:
Milosia is not real, her name is actually George Soros


Makes perfect sense 🤔

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 18:25:51   #
Fedup Veteran Loc: Bushnell, FL
 
LostAggie66 wrote:
Fedup there is a small group of us that already are awake. If ethics violations have occurred by any member of SCOTUS then they should be investigated and appropriate action taken regardless of whether they are conservative or liberal. SCOTUS is supposed to be the arbitrators of last resort. Did Democratic presidents make mistakes in choosing justices in recent years? I don't know. Did Republican presidents make mistakes in their SCOTUS Choices again I don't know. Right now the court is strongly conservative and finds for recent cases 6-3 I think. I don't know if expanding the court is a good idea at present. I do think there should be term limits for both SCOTUS and Congress besides elections but that is just my opinion.
Fedup there is a small group of us that already ar... (show quote)


I have been advocating for years that people NOT VOTE FOR ANY INCUMBENT, want to join in the crusade? It is the only way we will ever get term limits.

Reply
Jan 2, 2024 18:42:24   #
Marty 2020 Loc: Banana Republic of Kalifornia
 
Fedup Veteran wrote:
I have been advocating for years that people NOT VOTE FOR ANY INCUMBENT, want to join in the crusade? It is the only way we will ever get term limits.


Count me in!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.