My fact checkers say your fact checker is a scam.

It has been criticised for its methodology and accuracy.
According to Daniel Funke and Alexios Mantzarlis of the Poynter Institute, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[8] In 2018, the Columbia Journalism Review identified Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis."[9] Additionally, the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

Palmer Report exclusive: “Media Bias Fact Check” is a malicious scam site
One look at the “Media Bias Fact Check” website reveals it to be something that looks like it was created in 1995. Despite claiming in its tag line to be “The most comprehensive media bias resource,” the site turns out to simply be one guy named Dave Van Zandt who posts whatever he feels like. He claims to use a “strict methodology” for assigning bias ratings to various news outlets, but his “ratings” typically read like the gibberish one might find in an unmoderated comment section in the lowest corners of the internet.
https://www.palmerreport.com/politics/palmer-report-exclusive-media-bias-fact-check/2115/

I'm sorry you can't take the facts. But the public schools are falling behind religious schools and charter schools and private schools in the success of their students. Facts. And for less money. In most cases this is the fault of the unions who only pretend to be for the kids. They use that terminology as a useful tool. They are in fact there for and existing for the benefits of the teachers over anything else. More pay, less hours, shorter seasons, more security and all at the expense of the students.

Logically Right

How about we first get a real report from an unbiased entity, other then FOX. Here's what I'm for, consequences of actions, therefore if they go out and get arrested again, the penalties and times served will be doubled, also not to sit in jail but on some kind of hard labor work detail, along with community service, maybe they should go back to their home town and help fix it up, clean it up, not to mention some kind of self-improvement class to learn a laboring skill. This cost can be offset by their labor. They are criminals because they know no other way.

My fact checkers say your fact checker is a scam.

It has been criticised for its methodology and accuracy.
According to Daniel Funke and Alexios Mantzarlis of the Poynter Institute, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[8] In 2018, the Columbia Journalism Review identified Media Bias/Fact Check as "an armchair media analysis."[9] Additionally, the Columbia Journalism Review described Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and characterized their assessments as "subjective assessments [that] leave room for human biases, or even simple inconsistencies, to creep in".[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

Palmer Report exclusive: “Media Bias Fact Check” is a malicious scam site
One look at the “Media Bias Fact Check” website reveals it to be something that looks like it was created in 1995. Despite claiming in its tag line to be “The most comprehensive media bias resource,” the site turns out to simply be one guy named Dave Van Zandt who posts whatever he feels like. He claims to use a “strict methodology” for assigning bias ratings to various news outlets, but his “ratings” typically read like the gibberish one might find in an unmoderated comment section in the lowest corners of the internet.
https://www.palmerreport.com/politics/palmer-report-exclusive-media-bias-fact-check/2115/