Just a little something for my buddies who are gun nuts. Why do some people defend semi automatic rifles in the hands of general public in the USA? You have it backwards. I don’t have...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Why do some people defend semi automatic rifles in the hands of general public in the USA?

You have it backwards. I don’t have to defend why I should be allowed to own a semi-automatic rifle. You have to demonstrate why I shouldn’t be allowed to. And “I hate guns” is not a reason.

By the way, do you have any idea how long semi-automatic rifles have been around? Of course you don’t. Facts confuse the issue. The first semi-automatic, rifle was introduced in 1885. Yep. 134 years ago. Winchester began making the excellent model 1905, semi-auto rifle in, as the name implies, 1905. It was magazine fed, and accepted “hi capacity” magazines.

**** But know this.. while I am not for gun confiscation, I remain adamant about gun regulation..

In all those years, countless civilians have owned semi-automatic rifle, and it never caused a problem. Which makes the idea that semi-automatic rifles are responsible for the events going on today even more ludicrous.

Attached file:
(Download)

American Vet

permafrost wrote:

Why do some people defend semi automatic rifles in... (show quote)

Yet you defend FJB and the leftists and their anti freedom, anti American agenda.

You are simply a stupid, lying, cowardly, hypocrite.

But that has already been well established.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

American Vet wrote:

Yet you defend FJB and the leftists and their anti freedom, anti American agenda.

You are simply a stupid, lying, cowardly, hypocrite.

But that has already been well established.

Lord have mercy.... how could such dumb replies be generated from a simple article on history of guns..

You guys truly are the problem America faces..

But I had decided to not post for a few days and this jumped out and bit me before I could dismiss it..

Now, what did you think of the gun itself.. revolutionary? adequate? not worth a look?

Do you any opinion at all other then stone the poster??

Attached file:
(Download)

Smedley_buzkill

permafrost wrote:

Lord have mercy.... how could such dumb replies be generated from a simple article on history of guns..

You guys truly are the problem America faces..

But I had decided to not post for a few days and this jumped out and bit me before I could dismiss it..

Now, what did you think of the gun itself.. revolutionary? adequate? not worth a look?

Do you any opinion at all other then stone the poster??

The problem is you post your support of the Second Amendment, which flies in the fact of your support for Liberal Democrat politicians whose positions on firearms are antithetical to the ones you just stated. Little cognitive dissonance there.

You say you support the right to own semi auto firearms then vote for and support people who wish to destroy that right.

BIRDMAN

permafrost wrote:

Why do some people defend semi automatic rifles in... (show quote)

vernon

permafrost wrote:

Why do some people defend semi automatic rifles in... (show quote)

Please explain what you think is good gun regulation .

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

permafrost wrote:

Lord have mercy.... how could such dumb replies be generated from a simple article on history of guns..

You guys truly are the problem America faces..

But I had decided to not post for a few days and this jumped out and bit me before I could dismiss it..

Now, what did you think of the gun itself.. revolutionary? adequate? not worth a look?

Do you any opinion at all other then stone the poster??

Dumb shit draws dumb flies.

Get it?

Liberty Tree

permafrost wrote:

Lord have mercy.... how could such dumb replies be generated from a simple article on history of guns..

You guys truly are the problem America faces..

But I had decided to not post for a few days and this jumped out and bit me before I could dismiss it..

Now, what did you think of the gun itself.. revolutionary? adequate? not worth a look?

Do you any opinion at all other then stone the poster??

Go back to not posting

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

permafrost wrote:

Lord have mercy.... how could such dumb replies be generated from a simple article on history of guns..

You guys truly are the problem America faces..

But I had decided to not post for a few days and this jumped out and bit me before I could dismiss it..

Now, what did you think of the gun itself.. revolutionary? adequate? not worth a look?

Do you any opinion at all other then stone the poster??

I'm a problem alrigh, free thinkers are always like that.

Easy way to solve your issues...... grab your favorite handgun and square off with me..... winner walks away, loser feeds the buzzards.

Deal?

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

Liberty Tree wrote:

Go back to not posting

Stupid is like addiction..... he can't stop.

Liberty Tree

liberalhunter wrote:

Stupid is like addiction..... he can't stop.

I know!!

microphor Loc: Home is TN

permafrost wrote:

Why do some people defend semi automatic rifles in... (show quote)

WOW! Common sense!

""In all those years, countless civilians have owned semi-automatic rifle, and it never caused a problem. Which makes the idea that semi-automatic rifles are responsible for the events going on today even more ludicrous.""

pegw

40,000 people die each year due yo firearms. If this was a disease, ee would do something about it. The 2ed Admendment states "in order to provide for a militia' we are allowed to keep firearms. It doesn't say anything about blowing away kids in schools.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

The problem is you post your support of the Second Amendment, which flies in the fact of your support for Liberal Democrat politicians whose positions on firearms are antithetical to the ones you just stated. Little cognitive dissonance there.

You say you support the right to own semi auto firearms then vote for and support people who wish to destroy that right.

I think you are contending that Dems want to confiscate our guns.. that is not true and never going to happen.. but looking for a solution so some of the killings and lowering the death count should be a concern for every responsible minded person in our country.. Not to even mention those sitting in washington and pretending to run the country..

I expected to get some back and forth about the changes in mental outlook on violence ETC.. but it seem that I am seen as the dark horseman of anarchy.. remember, I have repeatedly said I own a number of guns and have been around guns for all my life.. members of my family have concealed carry permits and the state is one of the most liberal and armed in the country.. guns are very common in Minnesota and very few have any notion to end gun ownership.. while many who have suffered lose via gun events.. accident, suicide or murder.. will hope and dream of the removal of all guns everywhere, that is not going to happen..

liberalhunter Loc: Your mom's house

pegw wrote:

40,000 people die each year due yo firearms. If this was a disease, ee would do something about it. The 2ed Admendment states "in order to provide for a militia' we are allowed to keep firearms. It doesn't say anything about blowing away kids in schools.

Where's your stupid bias fact check garbage?

Oh..it's you stating it.

Fact checked it..... yep. You're dumb.