Just a little something for my buddies who are gun nuts..
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
So tell us more about "giant sized magazines." Exactly how are they conducive to mass shootings? It takes me less than five seconds to change out a magazine of wh**ever size in a rifle, about three seconds for a pistol. I had to spend about 2 hours practicing to be able to achieve this feat of legerdemain. How will banning "giant sized magazines" do any good? I'd rather have the smaller capacity anyway, they tend to be more reliable.
You must be fairly ham handed and inept if you cannot do the same.
So tell us more about "giant sized magazines.... (
show quote)
When you said ‘magazine’ PermaDummy went looking for a copy of Mad……
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Leave out the gun in his title post, and that's frosty.
F.D.R. wrote:
It appears you've been misunderstood. Good post.
It’s your lucky day he’s single
pegw wrote:
40,000 people die each year due yo firearms. If this was a disease, ee would do something about it. The 2ed Admendment states "in order to provide for a m*****a' we are allowed to keep firearms. It doesn't say anything about blowing away kids in schools.
Abysmally WRONG in every word.
permafrost wrote:
An open border is a border that enables free movement of people between jurisdictions with no restrictions on movement and is lacking substantive border control.
Our border is both restricted and heavily patrolled. far from open..
We also need to understand the difference between Immigrants, asylum seekers and i******s..
All that considered and still the border is an issue... a solution is called for.. wh**ever, feel free to expound on any idea for solution.. I think that it will require one of two things, a full enforcement of the penalties to those hiring the i******s, or a scraping and rewrite of the i*********n l*ws we have on the books./
An open border is a border that enables free movem... (
show quote)
Fine. The border is not open according to the way you are defining it. Call it a Porous border, because it leaks better than any colander ever made.
Considering the number of undesirables and criminals that get through, 'open' is logically correct enough.
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
So tell us more about "giant sized magazines." Exactly how are they conducive to mass shootings? It takes me less than five seconds to change out a magazine of wh**ever size in a rifle, about three seconds for a pistol. I had to spend about 2 hours practicing to be able to achieve this feat of legerdemain. How will banning "giant sized magazines" do any good? I'd rather have the smaller capacity anyway, they tend to be more reliable.
You must be fairly ham handed and inept if you cannot do the same.
So tell us more about "giant sized magazines.... (
show quote)
If you recall the nightclub shooting.. several escaped when the shooter changed mags. Yes only a few seconds but some lived because of those seconds of time.. smaller mag, more changes, perhaps a few more live..
What you say is correct, but the lives saved is also true..
permafrost wrote:
What is your concept of open borders????
The southern border is a perfect example!
The real criminal k**lers are elite members of governments forcing Wars , Poverty , Taxes , Debt , Ens***ement , Free Trade , Permits , No Public Utilities Owned anymore , All the Alphabet Groups & Officials living off your Dime with best of everything while you stave Poor Cold and Hungry , They are
Protected with best security (you buy & pay for ) while your Kids in Schools , Homes , Play Grounds are Murdered Raped Trafficked on the streets across the Nation along with drugs , thieves, raping, and pillaging murdering A Government that leaves you defenseless endless Wars murder your paying for only to Ens***e you more . Who are you really Protecting ask that question an why ? Who’s the real problem here seems to me it’s the Government
permafrost wrote:
If you recall the nightclub shooting.. several escaped when the shooter changed mags. Yes only a few seconds but some lived because of those seconds of time.. smaller mag, more changes, perhaps a few more live..
What you say is correct, but the lives saved is also true..
Mags don’t make difference people do
Strycker
Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
permafrost wrote:
If you recall the nightclub shooting.. several escaped when the shooter changed mags. Yes only a few seconds but some lived because of those seconds of time.. smaller mag, more changes, perhaps a few more live..
What you say is correct, but the lives saved is also true..
I wouldn't want to be restricted to six bullets if it might take seven to bring down a couple aggressive feral swine, an active shooter at a school or a group of lowlifes intent on doing harm.
As far as the argument of, "if it saves a few lives it's worth it", that same argument could be used to ban or restrict just about everything. Pools, playgrounds, cars, bathtubs, etc. With every restriction there is a cost in freedom, unintended consequences and lives.
When the founders stated "the right to bear arms" I have no doubt they believed that that right included the right to bear items that make the right to bear arms useful. Items such as bullets. Only a politician could twist the interpretation of "the right to bear arms" to not include that those arms could be fully operational.
permafrost wrote:
If you recall the nightclub shooting.. several escaped when the shooter changed mags. Yes only a few seconds but some lived because of those seconds of time.. smaller mag, more changes, perhaps a few more live..
What you say is correct, but the lives saved is also true..
Not necessarily. Using one example is anecdotal and worth nothing.
Plus your logic is extremely flawed.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.