Biden announces he will ban semi automatic weapons (Page 7): Bull pucky...

Drue-Marie

keepuphope wrote:

The problem with Biden is he proclaims something knowing that it will be struck down in the courts but defy their orders and just does them anyway. Which is what he did with school loan forgiveness. That is literally the definition of tyranny. Trump NEVER went against the courts and excepted their verdicts and he's the one the left calls a dictator. They need to study what a dictator is as Biden is literally guilty by his actions of being one.

Bull pucky

Ginny_Dandy Loc: Pacific Northwest

bluefish wrote:

Bull pucky

Actually, Keepuphope is right on the money!! Biden promised to pay student loans prior to the midterm elections. After the election, he reneged. Biden ALWAYS speaks with forked tongue. You can't trust a word he says!

Moeby

Really, unless you are out to kill a bunch of people. For home protection wouldn’t you rather have an old fashioned shotgun? Any intruder would wet their pants after hearing that distinctive pump sound.

Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA

JFlorio wrote:

GFY wuss. He was asked on the news and it’s recorded.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/videos/president-biden-says-he-will-continue-to-push-for-an-assault-weapons-ban-red-flag-laws/vi-AA14yO6

What do you say now dumba**?

Semi-auto matics, now... Revolvers, later. and they stop when the only gun available is the Flintlock loaded single shot?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCrscZljkwc

Or even a Matchlock Musket

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fALhSpyaWTc

No more mass shooting because those threaten are able to disarm the shooter... while they are reloading.

A well trained Musket rifleman can fire 3 shots in 1 min.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

Ferrous wrote:

Semi-auto matics, now... Revolvers, later. and they stop when the only gun available is the Flintlock loaded single shot?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCrscZljkwc

Or even a Matchlock Musket

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fALhSpyaWTc

No more mass shooting because those threaten are able to disarm the shooter... while they are reloading.

A well trained Musket rifleman can fire 3 shots in 1 min.

Yes, ang those 3 shots per minute killed an estimated 620,000 men. Far more than Vietnam with about 58,000 killed using automatic weapons.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Mikeyavelli wrote:

They haven't taken mine away.
The Second Amendment has no restrictions. The Second Amendment is granting the right to own guns, it's protecting the right to own guns. There is no question about type of gun. It is our God given right, not the government's benevolence in granting that right.

Exactly correct.
The only way the left can take away that right is by either making the Constitution irrelevant, which they are systematically trying to do, or to try and change what the 2ndA means, which they are ALSO trying to do.

Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich

perhaps, Trump, can ANNOUNCE A "WAR ON INCOMPETENT DEMONCRATS"...[ & their Electorate?}

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Ginny_Dandy wrote:

Actually, Keepuphope is right on the money!! Biden promised to pay student loans prior to the midterm elections. After the election, he reneged. Biden ALWAYS speaks with forked tongue. You can't trust a word he says!

Correct. He also said publicly, about several of his EOs, that they may not be Constitutional, but he was going to do it anyway, and let the courts decide. This is knowing violating his oath of office. One example is mask mandates.
And while on this subject, the court's one absolute, regardless of a district court or the Supreme Court, is that it MUST NOT violate the Constitution, or allow such violations to continue. A 'conservative' or 'Constitutional' judge abides by this regardless of his personal feelings and choices. This is something the left is also trying to change with their activist judges. They want the courts to support, ignore, or change the Constitution based on cultural pressure and party affiliation. Something the Constitution was EXPRESSLY designed to prevent.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Moeby wrote:

Really, unless you are out to kill a bunch of people. For home protection wouldn’t you rather have an old fashioned shotgun? Any intruder would wet their pants after hearing that distinctive pump sound.

I prefer a pistol. My choice, for perfectly valid reasons.
But a shotgun does make an excellent home defense weapon.
It has little use, however, in defending my country's freedom against oppressive government actions. As a weapon, a shotgun is limited to close range and tight quarters, depending on the specific gun and ammo used. A pistol has similar limitations, but wider applications because it is more portable and easily concealed.
A AR-15, or similar weapon, can be used for both home defense and, in mass, give pause to Democrats and other authoritarian inclined government agencies and organizations.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Ferrous wrote:

Semi-auto matics, now... Revolvers, later. and they stop when the only gun available is the Flintlock loaded single shot?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCrscZljkwc

Or even a Matchlock Musket

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fALhSpyaWTc

No more mass shooting because those threaten are able to disarm the shooter... while they are reloading.

A well trained Musket rifleman can fire 3 shots in 1 min.

Which just means a wanna be mass killer will use vehicles or explosives or poison or other means.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

youngwilliam wrote:

Yes, ang those 3 shots per minute killed an estimated 620,000 men. Far more than Vietnam with about 58,000 killed using automatic weapons.

Excellent point.

American Vet

youngwilliam wrote:

Yes, ang those 3 shots per minute killed an estimated 620,000 men. Far more than Vietnam with about 58,000 killed using automatic weapons.

By men lined up on a field shooting at each other by volley. And lot's of cannons as well.

Not everyone killed in Vietnam was killed with an automatic weapon.

youngwilliam Loc: Deep in the heart

American Vet wrote:

By men lined up on a field shooting at each other by volley. And lot's of cannons as well.

Not everyone killed in Vietnam was killed with an automatic weapon.

Just poiting out the difference

WinkyTink Loc: Hill Country, TX

RandyBrian wrote:

Exactly correct.
The only way the left can take away that right is by either making the Constitution irrelevant, which they are systematically trying to do, or to try and change what the 2ndA means, which they are ALSO trying to do.

Agreed. To boot, I’m personally exhausted arguing the the firearm thing after every shooting that meets the lefts “minimum” narrative requirements. I would recommend that the feds try to change the laws and then see what actually happens.

There is only one way to disarm me. If you think otherwise, good luck to you.

Mikeyavelli

WinkyTink wrote:

Agreed. To boot, I’m personally exhausted arguing the the firearm thing after every shooting that meets the lefts “minimum” narrative requirements. I would recommend that the feds try to change the laws and then see what actually happens.

There is only one way to disarm me. If you think otherwise, good luck to you.

Ditto from me.
The Second Amendment grants no rights to own a gun or a cannon. It protects the god given right for any man to protect himself. And the kommiecrats don't like that I can protect myself.