Can Republicans and Democrats work together for the good of this country??...
American Vet wrote:
Not criticizing ‘grammar’. Just explaining to you that proper grammar conveys a clear precise message instead of the mish-mash of nearly incomprehensible things you throw out.
And there is no ‘rule of grammar’ for you to explain.
I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show you there are rules of grammar There is a rule of grammar specifying when to use -is - as oppose to are
for instance, your last sentence
NEVER START A SENTENCE WITH A COORDINATING CONJUNCTION. WHEN TALKING ABOUT AN ITEM DEPENDING ON WHETHER SPEAKING OF A, OR ONE ITEM ,YOU SHOULD USE -IS- WHEN TALKING ABOUTS THINGS IN A PLURALITY YOU SHOULD USE - ARE- ( the rules of grammar says your sentence should have went like this ; There aren't any rules of grammar.; the word ' rules is suggestive of a plurality instead of a singularity
This is just one of the many flaws of your sentence. I think you barely missed using what they call a double negative ,since the word -No- is in fact an answer when one is not affirming something as oppose to affirming something.
Just pointing out you should cease with the double standards of critiquing peoples grammar
-and - you don't know good grammar from bad grammar.The only reason I accepted that criticism from you is because I am not qualified to say what is good grammar or bad grammar , neither are you - very few people can.I know this because I caught your side of the political spectrum using and writing bad grammar all over the forum,that proud one , and a host of others just like her- not only that, but the essence of what this forum is suppose to be about - that is the efficiency of political ideas -well, your right wing ideas stink- they make no sense ,and are more emotional than logical .
rebelwidacoz wrote:
I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show you there are rules of grammar There is a rule of grammar specifying when to use -is - as oppose to are
for instance, your last sentence
NEVER START A SENTENCE WITH A COORDINATING CONJUNCTION. WHEN TALKING ABOUT AN ITEM DEPENDING ON WHETHER SPEAKING OF A, OR ONE ITEM ,YOU SHOULD USE -IS- WHEN TALKING ABOUTS THINGS IN A PLURALITY YOU SHOULD USE - ARE- ( the rules of grammar says your sentence should have went like this ; There aren't any rules of grammar.; the word ' rules is suggestive of a plurality instead of a singularity
This is just one of the many flaws of your sentence. I think you barely missed using what they call a double negative ,since the word -No- is in fact an answer when one is not affirming something as oppose to affirming something.
Just pointing out you should cease with the double standards of critiquing peoples grammar
-and - you don't know good grammar from bad grammar.The only reason I accepted that criticism from you is because I am not qualified to say what is good grammar or bad grammar , neither are you - very few people can.I know this because I caught your side of the political spectrum using and writing bad grammar all over the forum,that proud one , and a host of others just like her- not only that, but the essence of what this forum is suppose to be about - that is the efficiency of political ideas -well, your right wing ideas stink- they make no sense ,and are more emotional than logical .
I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show y... (
show quote)
Is this English class or Political Forum???
rebelwidacoz wrote:
I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show you there are rules of grammar There is a rule of grammar specifying when to use -is - as oppose to are
for instance, your last sentence
NEVER START A SENTENCE WITH A COORDINATING CONJUNCTION. WHEN TALKING ABOUT AN ITEM DEPENDING ON WHETHER SPEAKING OF A, OR ONE ITEM ,YOU SHOULD USE -IS- WHEN TALKING ABOUTS THINGS IN A PLURALITY YOU SHOULD USE - ARE- ( the rules of grammar says your sentence should have went like this ; There aren't any rules of grammar.; the word ' rules is suggestive of a plurality instead of a singularity
This is just one of the many flaws of your sentence. I think you barely missed using what they call a double negative ,since the word -No- is in fact an answer when one is not affirming something as oppose to affirming something.
Just pointing out you should cease with the double standards of critiquing peoples grammar
-and - you don't know good grammar from bad grammar.The only reason I accepted that criticism from you is because I am not qualified to say what is good grammar or bad grammar , neither are you - very few people can.I know this because I caught your side of the political spectrum using and writing bad grammar all over the forum,that proud one , and a host of others just like her- not only that, but the essence of what this forum is suppose to be about - that is the efficiency of political ideas -well, your right wing ideas stink- they make no sense ,and are more emotional than logical .
I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show y... (
show quote)
=====================
But , but, and more buts! And that isn't all! NWR
We do not care, troll!
I jumped off this thread sometime back .Getting back to it I see little hope of Republicans and Democrats working together. Pretty darn sad---- I wish people could just be people with common goals for mutual prosperity .
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I jumped off this thread sometime back .Getting back to it I see little hope of Republicans and Democrats working together. Pretty darn sad---- I wish people could just be people with common goals for mutual prosperity .
Agreed - and most of us just want to live in peace and be happy.
rebelwidacoz wrote:
I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show you there are rules of grammar There is a rule of grammar specifying when to use -is - as oppose to are
for instance, your last sentence
NEVER START A SENTENCE WITH A COORDINATING CONJUNCTION. WHEN TALKING ABOUT AN ITEM DEPENDING ON WHETHER SPEAKING OF A, OR ONE ITEM ,YOU SHOULD USE -IS- WHEN TALKING ABOUTS THINGS IN A PLURALITY YOU SHOULD USE - ARE- ( the rules of grammar says your sentence should have went like this ; There aren't any rules of grammar.; the word ' rules is suggestive of a plurality instead of a singularity
This is just one of the many flaws of your sentence. I think you barely missed using what they call a double negative ,since the word -No- is in fact an answer when one is not affirming something as oppose to affirming something.
Just pointing out you should cease with the double standards of critiquing peoples grammar
-and - you don't know good grammar from bad grammar.The only reason I accepted that criticism from you is because I am not qualified to say what is good grammar or bad grammar , neither are you - very few people can.I know this because I caught your side of the political spectrum using and writing bad grammar all over the forum,that proud one , and a host of others just like her- not only that, but the essence of what this forum is suppose to be about - that is the efficiency of political ideas -well, your right wing ideas stink- they make no sense ,and are more emotional than logical .
I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show y... (
show quote)
Your sentence structure needs a lot of work.
proud republican wrote:
Is this English class or Political Forum???
:sm6:
It is about time,I asserted this to loki five years ago.The reason why your advice should be heeded is because you and they do a lot of this^^^^^^^^^^
"YEAH. I HAVE CONTENDED ALL ALONG THAT "YOU PEOPLE" are a bunch of lying _ _ _ ,stupid fake _ _ _ human rights champions hypocrytes all over the world.
rebelwidacoz wrote:
"YEAH. I HAVE CONTENDED ALL ALONG THAT "YOU PEOPLE" are a bunch of lying _ _ _ ,stupid fake _ _ _ human rights champions hypocrytes all over the world.
Look in the mirror and see who is fake, darling!!..😁
proud republican wrote:
Look in the mirror and see who is fake, darling!!..😁
Fake about what ? Darling. If I am one of the writers of the constitution and I write that the country's citizens .....no , since you say there is something wrong with my grammar and sentence structure, let me restructure my sentence
And I write the country's citizens have freedom of speech,and the right to plan their family ,I wouldn't promise liberties and abruptly deny them that particular church first , state second liberty - this is just an example of your hypocrisy or stupidity one.
rebelwidacoz wrote:
Fake about what ? Darling. If I am one of the writers of the constitution and I write that the country's citizens .....no , since you say there is something wrong with my grammar and sentence structure, let me restructure my sentence
And I write the country's citizens have freedom of speech,and the right to plan their family ,I wouldn't promise liberties and abruptly deny them that particular church first , state second liberty - this is just an example of your hypocrisy or stupidity one.
Fake about what ? Darling. If I am one of the writ... (
show quote)
I have no clear understanding what you're trying to communicate here. It could well be me, the fog of morning, yet your syntax has me scratching my head.
padremike wrote:
I have no clear understanding what you're trying to communicate here. It could well be me, the fog of morning, yet your syntax has me scratching my head.
I Know you don't; for your answer as to what we are talking about you should consult - Proud...uh- American - surprisedly, for once she had common intelligent central idea or thought.
rebelwidacoz wrote:
I Know you don't; for your answer as to what we are talking about you should consult - Proud...uh- American - surprisedly, for once she had common intelligent central idea or thought.
You mean 'surprisingly' English teacher...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.