Democrats War on Guns (Page 4): My semi auto shotgun has done loads of killing! Good thing ducks don’t vote!

Big dog

pegw wrote:

War on guns, yes, semiautomatics kill people. They can kill a lot of people at once. They should be banned permanently

My semi auto shotgun has done loads of killing! Good thing ducks don’t vote!

valkyrierider Loc: "Land of Trump"

PeterS wrote:

And the thing is, it's a war that gets only stronger with each and every mass shooting with that gun you con's simply can't do without...

It is not the gun that kills. It is the individual that uses the gun. Kill the bastard that uses the gun. Make it a law that if you kill someone with a gun, you die as soon as they apprehend you. Your dumb. You blame the cop for shooting someone when he uses a gun and not the gun, but when an individual shoots someone you blame a gun that cannot operate by itself, so in other words the gun did not kill. How ignorant are you.

valkyrierider Loc: "Land of Trump"

pegw wrote:

War on guns, yes, semiautomatics kill people. They can kill a lot of people at once. They should be banned permanently

Stupid is as stupid does. The semiautomatic can not kill if an asshole doesn't pick it up. The gun is not at fault. You are not smart enough to win against the truth.

valkyrierider Loc: "Land of Trump"

PeterS wrote:

So without an AR-15 and other semi-automatics, you will be left defenseless? So how is it those are the only guns you can defend yourself with?

Why does the armed forces not use something else. For the very same reason. And the reason we have AR15's and other guns like that is to protect ourselves from the US GOVERNMENT and stupid people like you

wilpharm

pegw wrote:

War on guns, yes, semiautomatics kill people. They can kill a lot of people at once. They should be banned permanently

then all policemen would only carry revolvers???

Smedley_buzkill

PeterS wrote:

No one is suggesting that we take away cars but other than a plaything there is no point to an AR-15. And my wife's best friend used a .38 special revolver to kill the man who raped her. Four shots were three more than needed to kill him so clearly you can defend yourselves with something other than semi-automatic weapons. That's liberal logic, the rest is Republican hyperbole...

You are an idiot. You have never been in a life or death situation. You are nothing more than a half-assed armchair quarterback; trying to foist off your ridiculous beliefs on people who have been there and done that.

Smedley_buzkill

valkyrierider wrote:

Stupid is as stupid does. The semiautomatic can not kill if an asshole doesn't pick it up. The gun is not at fault. You are not smart enough to win against the truth.

She isn't smart enough to win against an eggplant.

Smedley_buzkill

WEBCO wrote:

Liberal logic...ban semi-automatic guns

99% of guns are semi-automatic.

When you gain, even a rudimentary, knowledge of guns then you can have an opinion on guns. Until then shut up

Like I said, he is an armchair quarterback. He has never been in any of the situations he describes, yet he tells those of us who have how we should conduct ourselves. I believe Peter said once he was an Atheist. (I could be wrong). At any rate, people like him should rethink the idea of a loving God in charge of things, because in a truly Darwinian universe, Liberal morons would be as extinct as a Dodo Bird faster than you can say "Origin of Species."

Big Kahuna

valkyrierider wrote:

Why does the armed forces not use something else. For the very same reason. And the reason we have AR15's and other guns like that is to protect ourselves from the US GOVERNMENT and stupid people like you

Can people carry machine guns to protect themselves from people like little Peter??

Big Kahuna

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Like I said, he is an armchair quarterback. He has never been in any of the situations he describes, yet he tells those of us who have how we should conduct ourselves. I believe Peter said once he was an Atheist. (I could be wrong). At any rate, people like him should rethink the idea of a loving God in charge of things, because in a truly Darwinian universe, Liberal morons would be as extinct as a Dodo Bird faster than you can say "Origin of Species."

You are right . These libtards don't realize in Darwin's world, libtards would be the 1st to be made extinct.

Justice101

Big Kahuna wrote:

Can people carry machine guns to protect themselves from people like little Peter??

No need to go that heavy to swat a fly. How about a paintball gun? They're legal and awesome fun.

Big dog

Big Kahuna wrote:

Can people carry machine guns to protect themselves from people like little Peter??

Come to think of it, aren’t all guns machines?

coelacanth Loc: Michigan swamp

PeterS wrote:

So tell me, how often do you cons confront bad guys with AR-15s with your AR-15s? And if bolt-action rifles are such bad ideas why do snipers use them? And cops can still use whatever gun they are using now so you will only have to hold off bad guys with AR-15s with your revolver, bolt action, or pump shotgun with buck shot until your local cops can get there.

Like a fire extinguisher is handy to have in case of fire, a sport-utility rifle, with a standard capacity magazine is handy during a home invasion, especially against multiple armed attackers. Where I live, out in the Boondocks, a cop could be twenty miles from me. A gun in my hand is better than a whole police department on the phone.