Democrats War on Guns: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/07/29/house-dems-address-economic-recession-by-declaring-war-on-modern-sporting-rifles-n2611017 What with the...

guzzimaestro

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/07/29/house-dems-address-economic-recession-by-declaring-war-on-modern-sporting-rifles-n2611017

What with the proliference of RINOs in the Senate, we might be in trouble here...

PeterS

guzzimaestro wrote:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2022/07/29/house-dems-address-economic-recession-by-declaring-war-on-modern-sporting-rifles-n2611017

What with the proliference of RINOs in the Senate, we might be in trouble here...

And the thing is, it's a war that gets only stronger with each and every mass shooting with that gun you con's simply can't do without...

Liberty Tree

PeterS wrote:

And the thing is, it's a war that gets only stronger with each and every mass shooting with that gun you con's simply can't do without...

A war on guns will be no more effective than the war on alcohol or the war on drugs. Only the law abiding will obey it and they will be left defenseless.

pegw

War on guns, yes, semiautomatics k**l people. They can k**l a lot of people at once. They should be banned permanently

Gatsby

PeterS wrote:

And the thing is, it's a war that gets only stronger with each and every mass shooting with that gun you con's simply can't do without...

And when the SCOTUS rules that those "assault style" weapons are exactly the type of "arms" that are protected?

Liberty Tree

pegw wrote:

War on guns, yes, semiautomatics k**l people. They can k**l a lot of people at once. They should be banned permanently

Describe a semi-automatic weapon without looking it up.

guzzimaestro

PeterS wrote:

And the thing is, it's a war that gets only stronger with each and every mass shooting with that gun you con's simply can't do without...

In your liberal logic, we should ban cars when some nut job mows down a row of protesters. I***t.

PeterS

Liberty Tree wrote:

A war on guns will be no more effective than the war on alcohol or the war on drugs. Only the law abiding will obey it and they will be left defenseless.

So without an AR-15 and other semi-automatics, you will be left defenseless? So how is it those are the only guns you can defend yourself with?

PeterS

guzzimaestro wrote:

In your liberal logic, we should ban cars when some nut job mows down a row of protesters. I***t.

No one is suggesting that we take away cars but other than a plaything there is no point to an AR-15. And my wife's best friend used a .38 special revolver to k**l the man who raped her. Four shots were three more than needed to k**l him so clearly you can defend yourselves with something other than semi-automatic weapons. That's liberal logic, the rest is Republican hyperbole...

Gatsby

guzzimaestro wrote:

In your liberal logic, we should ban cars when some nut job mows down a row of protesters. I***t.

Next, I suppose that we must hold auto makers responsible for damages caused by drunk drivers.

guzzimaestro

PeterS wrote:

No one is suggesting that we take away cars but other than a plaything there is no point to an AR-15. And my wife's best friend used a .38 special revolver to k**l the man who raped her. Four shots were three more than needed to k**l him so clearly you can defend yourselves with something other than semi-automatic weapons. That's liberal logic, the rest is Republican hyperbole...

Maybe but the bans won't change anything. What's wrong isn't the guns. It's your woke bs and your war on religion, on demand a******n , letting criminals out of jail and all your other ridiculous policies that have destroyed America.

PeterS

Gatsby wrote:

And when the SCOTUS rules that those "assault style" weapons are exactly the type of "arms" that are protected?

They can make any ruling they want but as they themselves have proven, their rulings only matter until another court decides to change them.

And then there are always constitutional amendments. We already have a majority of people in this country who believe that AR-15s and similar types of weapons should be banned. If it takes a constitutional amendment...then that's the way we will go.

PeterS

guzzimaestro wrote:

Maybe but the bans won't change anything. What's wrong isn't the guns. It's your woke bs and your war on religion, on demand a******n , letting criminals out of jail and all your other ridiculous policies that have destroyed America.

If it's not guns why aren't there mass shootings in other countries that have banned them?

Liberty Tree

PeterS wrote:

So without an AR-15 and other semi-automatics, you will be left defenseless? So how is it those are the only guns you can defend yourself with?

If you think criminals will not still have semi- automatic weapons you are a fool. If you want to face their semi-automatic weapon with a bolt action rifle you are a bigger fool.

PeterS

Liberty Tree wrote:

Describe a semi-automatic weapon without looking it up.

A gun with a single feed that fires a shot each time the trigger is pulled. And for your information, a revolver is not classified as a semi-automatic so would not fall under a ban on semi-automatic weapons...unless, of course, you would like it too...