One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
There I Nothing Wrong With Supreme Court Justices Believing In God...
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
Feb 11, 2022 01:41:15   #
woodguru
 
But they can't put the bible ahead of the constitution, which is what religiously oriented zealots do

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 02:34:23   #
Gatsby
 
woodguru wrote:
But they can't put the bible ahead of the constitution, which is what religiously oriented zealots do


When you and God disagree, God is wrong?

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 04:35:32   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
woodguru wrote:
But they can't put the bible ahead of the constitution, which is what religiously oriented zealots do


Provide an example please...

I'm not very familiar with the SC...

When has a SC Justice ruled against the Constitution due to their religious beliefs???

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2022 06:36:10   #
336Robin Loc: North Carolina
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Provide an example please...

I'm not very familiar with the SC...

When has a SC Justice ruled against the Constitution due to their religious beliefs???


Well right now Roe vs. Wade is up on the to do list and look how many of those folks are Catholic.

Catholics are famous for the pressure they put on each other and I see the man's point. He is concerned that
settled law is going to be reversed on account of a persons religion.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 06:39:32   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
336Robin wrote:
Well right now Roe vs. Wade is up on the to do list and look how many of those folks are Catholic.

Catholics are famous for the pressure they put on each other and I see the man's point. He is concerned that
settled law is going to be reversed on account of a persons religion.


Your example is something that has not happened...
And has no historical precedence...
Just blind bigotry towards individuals of faith...

You sound really smart making it...

Really...

Really...

Smart...

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 06:44:03   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
336Robin wrote:
Well right now Roe vs. Wade is up on the to do list and look how many of those folks are Catholic.

Catholics are famous for the pressure they put on each other and I see the man's point. He is concerned that
settled law is going to be reversed on account of a persons religion.


Do you realize how utterly stupid that sounds?

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 07:18:56   #
American Vet
 
336Robin wrote:
Well right now Roe vs. Wade is up on the to do list and look how many of those folks are Catholic.

Catholics are famous for the pressure they put on each other and I see the man's point. He is concerned that
settled law is going to be reversed on account of a persons religion.


Many people are opposed to abortion - not just those who are religious and/or Protestant.

https://www.facebook.com/AtheistsAgainstAbortion

https://www.prolifehumanists.org/secular-case-against-abortion/

https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2020/08/the-jewish-case-against-abortion

Hinduism on Abortion - The Modern Hindu
The three deontological premises against abortion are established below, namely 1) the unborn is a human life, 2) it is wrong to take a human life, and 3) abortion is the taking of a human life.
https://themodernhindu.wordpress.com/2018/05/18/hinduism-on-abortion/

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2022 07:23:23   #
Rose42
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Your example is something that has not happened...
And has no historical precedence...
Just blind bigotry towards individuals of faith...

You sound really smart making it...

Really...

Really...

Smart...



Reply
Feb 11, 2022 07:26:11   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
woodguru wrote:
But they can't put the bible ahead of the constitution, which is what religiously oriented zealots do

Sorry woodglue but personally I'll ALWAYS put God and the Bible first if the Constitution puts itself ahead of Him.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 07:28:02   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
336Robin wrote:
Well right now Roe vs. Wade is up on the to do list and look how many of those folks are Catholic.

Catholics are famous for the pressure they put on each other and I see the man's point. He is concerned that
settled law is going to be reversed on account of a persons religion.

How can it be "settled law" when the leftists consider the constitution "fluid?"

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 07:33:38   #
American Vet
 
Parky60 wrote:
How can it be "settled law" when the leftists consider the constitution "fluid?"



Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2022 07:47:56   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
American Vet wrote:


"Settled" to the left means they've got it where they want it.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 12:17:00   #
336Robin Loc: North Carolina
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Your example is something that has not happened...
And has no historical precedence...
Just blind bigotry towards individuals of faith...

You sound really smart making it...

Really...

Really...

Smart...


I can't wait until they do away with it. That will seal the Republican fate.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 15:53:47   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
336Robin wrote:
I can't wait until they do away with it. That will seal the Republican fate.
I assume you mean if SCOTUS overturns Roe v Wade, it will destroy the Republican party.
How so?

Roe v Wade was a SCOTUS ruling, not a bill passed by both houses of Congress and signed into law by the POTUS.

The decision was based on the due process clause of the 14th amendment which provides a "right to privacy" that supposedly protects a pregnant woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion, or as the saying goes, "the right to control her body".

If a woman has the right to control her body, would this not also include her right to control her sexual urges
and, in doing so, prevent the possibility of pregnancy altogether?

The Roe v Wade decision was not only unconstitutional (9th Amendment), it was immoral, unjust, and opened the door for industrialized genocide.

In a highly cited Yale Law Journal article published in the months after the decision, the American legal scholar John Hart Ely strongly criticized Roe as a decision that was disconnected from American constitutional law:

What is frightening about Roe is that this super-protected right is not inferable from the language of the Constitution, the framers' thinking respecting the specific problem in issue, any general value derivable from the provisions they included, or the nation's governmental structure. The problem with Roe is not so much that it bungles the question it sets itself, but rather that it sets itself a question the Constitution has not made the Court's business. Roe is bad because it is bad constitutional law, or rather because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.

American constitutional law scholar Laurence Tribe had similar thoughts: "One of the most curious things about Roe is that, behind its own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found."

PPH picked up the RvW ball and, in capitalizing on selling the remains of aborted babies for research, carried it far beyond the goal post. Many of the experiments with aborted baby parts would please Joseph Mengele.

The establishment of a billion dollar industry dedicated to killing the most defenseless and innocent of all human beings among us is evil.

Roe v Wade sealed the fates of millions of unborn babies.

Happy Birthday! Make a wish.

Reply
Feb 11, 2022 16:41:31   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
"Settled" to the left means they've got it where they want it.


It means they've got it where they want it and they don't want anyone else to mess with it. Like they did on several election recounts, notably the jerk SNL senator from Minnesota eons ago. When the recount finally showed in their favor, they said, "OK, that's enough, recount is over."

Reply
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.