Let's figure this out. There is probably more to this than we are being told (Page 6): Ya got me :sm24: :sm23:...

microphor Loc: Home is TN

nwtk2007 wrote:

The NIB: National Inefficiency Board!!

Ya got me

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

LogicallyRight wrote:

I sort of understand his position. I have been ask... (show quote)

"I sort of understand his position. I have been asked for I. D. to buy a six pack at 81. When do you start honoring Senior Citizens. My wrinkles are over 21, I have grey hair, and my beard is over 50 years old."

It really pisses me off when a cashier at any store requires me at 73 to show an ID, because his company requires it.
Using their brain is not allowed.
Sometimes out of spite, I tell them to keep the beer, and I shop elsewhere.
Stupidity is hard to swallow

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Michael10 wrote:

So you're ok with honest citizens losing their ability to vote because of some new law written to subdue the vote? Not much of a friend to Democracy are you... Plus it's not about an election won or lost it's about denying an 85 year old his opportunity to vote. What if someone told you that you couldn't vote because of some obscure new law, bet things would be different then.

Can you prove it is written to subdue a vote. More than rhetoric required!

bggamers Loc: georgia

nwtk2007 wrote:

The NIB: National Inefficiency Board!!

good one

federally indicted mattoid

Michael10 wrote:

No you're not talking about the Jan 6 riots, I'll NEVER forget those traitors...So you attacked police and the Capitol building in your HS cafeteria? I was in quite a few fights in HS but nothing like this and we always split when the cops showed up, we didn't attack them.

ntwk is not just a republican troll, he's a putin-supporting republican troll.

Attempting to sow discord always.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

soontobeindicted mattoid wrote:

ntwk is not just a republican troll, he's a putin-supporting republican troll.

Attempting to sow discord always.

For a troll I have generated quite aa bit of discussion on this forum, most not discordant!

bggamers Loc: georgia

nwtk2007 wrote:

For a troll I have generated quite aa bit of discussion on this forum, most not discordant!

Point taken

SilentGeneration Loc: Michigan

What about folks who were born in places or in times when state issued birth certificates weren't issued?

American Vet

SilentGeneration wrote:

What about folks who were born in places or in times when state issued birth certificates weren't issued?

I believe every state has a mechanism for obtaining a birth certificate for those who were born in situations you describe.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

American Vet wrote:

I believe every state has a mechanism for obtaining a birth certificate for those who were born in situations you describe.

Yep, and it ain't that hard.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

SilentGeneration wrote:

What about folks who were born in places or in times when state issued birth certificates weren't issued?

There's ways that they will accept in certain cases like court house burning to the ground or born at home and not recorded in hospital or court records. My mom's birth certificate was re-issued as a result of her birth being recorded in the family bible. Another case I know of was a sworn affidavit.

Michael10

American Vet wrote:

I believe every state has a mechanism for obtaining a birth certificate for those who were born in situations you describe.

I believe every state has in place a mechanism to keep their elections secure already, without these new laws that slows down and makes the process of voting harder. Every legal citizen should have full access to vote, period...

microphor Loc: Home is TN

Michael10 wrote:

I believe every state has in place a mechanism to keep their elections secure already, without these new laws that slows down and makes the process of voting harder. Every legal citizen should have full access to vote, period...

In this country, if your a "legal" citizen there's proof. Remember that states changed voting procedures using Covid as justification, why didn't you have a problem with those new voting laws/rules/ standards- whatever they were. They made verifying votes in a timely fashion impossible.

Michael10

microphor wrote:

In this country, if your a "legal" citizen there's proof. Remember that states changed voting procedures using Covid as justification, why didn't you have a problem with those new voting laws/rules/ standards- whatever they were. They made verifying votes in a timely fashion impossible.

Those laws/rules/standards didn't make it harder for people to vote, they didn't shorten early voting and they didn't discourage mail in votes, something that has worked just fine for years.

American Vet

Michael10 wrote:

I believe every state has in place a mechanism to keep their elections secure already, without these new laws that slows down and makes the process of voting harder. Every legal citizen should have full access to vote, period...

I believe that every state has an obligation to ensure the vote is protected; that those who register to vote are, in fact, eligible to vote; and that when they vote they are correctly identified with a valid photo ID. Security is of paramount importance; and over-rides one desire for 'convenience - or flat out lazy.

Every legal citizen can vote.