One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who the hell are vigilantes anyway?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 16 next> last>>
Nov 27, 2021 14:56:12   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
Nothing is unethical for rwnj’s
This case proves the right to shoot whom ever you feel is a threat to you, life in the US will get exponentially more violent, yea, good going guys.


When a person determines that someone is a threat to them, they have the right to use equal force plus a little to stop the threat.
If some one is slapping you, you have the right to hit them to make them stop. That is equal force plus a little. You do NOT have the right to beat them into the ground. When the threat is over, you must stop...immediately!
When the threat may cause great bodily harm or death, then lethal force is legal. That is equal force plus a little. Your statement means absolutely NOTHING!!! because you failed to mentioned that a riot was happening...people got killed by rioters. You strain a gnat and swallow a camel!!!

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 14:57:13   #
Big Kahuna
 
eden wrote:
....who was rioting. There, finished your sentence for you.


My sentence ended with the period placed correctly at the end of the sentence. I don't need you finishing a sentence that was already finished!!

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 14:59:32   #
eden
 
drlarrygino wrote:
My sentence ended with the period placed correctly at the end of the sentence. I don't need you finishing a sentence that was already finished!!


No and you certainly don’t want to have your nose rubbed in the facts. Don’t worry I get it.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2021 15:07:48   #
eden
 
Justice101 wrote:
It depends upon at what time and when it became a "riot". There were hundreds of people there with cell phones recording "Peaceful Protests", up until Capitol Police started throwing flashbang grenades into the crowd from above balcony and teargassing the crowd. Would that not make people angry and upset, if all they were doing were protesting and holding signs? I was not there, but I saw many cell phone videos that can attest to that. People are scared to be put in jail for just protesting and letting their voices be heard. They are not allowed to have the "wrongthink" that there were irregularities in the 2020 election which allowed the wrong person to win the election. Political persecution at its very worst. Censorship against expressing 1st Amendment freedom. First, they take away your speech, then they come after your guns. What comes next Patriots?
It depends upon at what time and when it became a ... (show quote)


You make an interesting case for BLM and Antifa-led protests too. They are expressing their first amendment freedoms also, that is until some opportunists in the crowd start looting and burning, then the police need to step in with flashbang grenades and teargas,

.....just like the police did at the Capitol on Jan 6.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 15:11:21   #
eden
 
Justice101 wrote:
He didn't violate either of those. Did you watch the trial?


Did you?

He was charged with those offenses which were later dismissed by a Judge widely criticized for his apparent bias.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 15:14:15   #
eden
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Lie, he had a legal right to have that gun and that is why judge dismissed gun charges. Read some real news.


Judge dismissed gun charge because in his view the Law was “too vaguely written”.
Lawyerspeak for we need to change this narrative.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 15:36:41   #
Big Kahuna
 
eden wrote:
Curfew Violation, illegal possession of a firearm while underage.


Both charges were proven false. Quit lying you big @#$%.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2021 15:39:25   #
Big Kahuna
 
Justice101 wrote:
He didn't violate either of those. Did you watch the trial?


Eden is fill of @$&%^.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 15:42:38   #
Big Kahuna
 
eden wrote:
No and you certainly don’t want to have your nose rubbed in the facts. Don’t worry I get it.


Learn what proper sentence structure is before you start spouting more insanity.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 15:44:41   #
Big Kahuna
 
eden wrote:
Did you?

He was charged with those offenses which were later dismissed by a Judge widely criticized for his apparent bias.


The judge was a democrat. How biased can he be??? More insane and incorrect statements from you.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 15:46:32   #
Justice101
 
eden wrote:
You make an interesting case for BLM and Antifa-led protests too. They are expressing their first amendment freedoms also, that is until some opportunists in the crowd start looting and burning, then the police need to step in with flashbang grenades and teargas,

.....just like the police did at the Capitol on Jan 6.


The police in the Antifa/BLM-led protests were told to stand down and allowed the violence against them and their towns to occur. They were able to arrest some of the perps who were able to make bail with the help of the friendly Democrats and ultimately, many were able to have their charges dropped unlike those held as political prisoners for stepping foot in the Capitol on January 6 for a few minutes, and being sentenced to 60 days in jail, "in order to deter future such displays". Is this equal justice under the law? If you think this is, I can remind you about the disruption during the Kavanaugh hearings, where the people involved were given $50 fines and released.

October 14
Police and climate activists clashed Thursday during protests at the Interior Department, with security personnel sustaining “multiple injuries” and one officer being taken to a hospital, agency spokeswoman Melissa Schwartz said.

Climate demonstrators were attempting to occupy the Interior Department, with dozens entering the Stewart Lee Udall Main Interior Building on C Street NW. Those who remained outside clashed with police as they tried to keep the one unlocked door open. At times, protesters attempted to push past the police line.

The protesters were here for People vs. Fossil Fuels, five days of demonstrations by a coalition of groups known as Build Back Fossil Free that has included Indigenous leaders from across the country. The coalition’s name is a nod to President Biden’s “Build Back Better” agenda.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/10/14/climate-activists-indigenous-interior-department/
https://www.newsweek.com/over-100-arrested-during-climate-protest-interior-department-some-reportedly-tased-1639484


It's fine and dandy if it is those on the Left who are the "Insurrectionists" am I correct? LWSJW and "Environmentalists" get a free pass because they fit the agenda of the ruling Politicos.

Reply
 
 
Nov 27, 2021 15:48:54   #
JW
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
And there it is...the rights reasoning... if it's not illegal, we *can* do it, forget about the fact that is unethical or immoral, this is their podium and their stance they live by, pure perversions of moralities. GOP~RIP


You have no problem with the ethics or morality of destroying other people's property, businesses, lives?

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 15:50:40   #
Justice101
 
eden wrote:
Did you?

He was charged with those offenses which were later dismissed by a Judge widely criticized for his apparent bias.


I watched the whole trial. That is why I asked if had you watched it, you wouldn't have made your false statement.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 16:28:52   #
Alber
 
PeterS wrote:
When I stated that Kyle Rittenhouse was a vigilante PR and those that follow her came a bit unglued at the suggestion even though he fit the definition to a tee. Well, it was written 80 years ago but George Steinback knew exactly what a vigilante was and I hate to say, but Kyle "I support BLM, wink wink" Rittenhouse most certainly was...


Today, John Steinbeck would have written something similar in his book: A Dubios Battle.
Mac, who the hell are those antifas and violent BLMs, backed by corrupt politicians, anyway?
They are the dirtiest criminals in any city.
They are the same ones that burn the business of any citizen, white or black, during the riots.
They are the same ones who kill anyone, black or white, who opposes them.
They like to be cruel and hurt people.
Corrupt politicians always give them a nice name, peaceful protesters.

Reply
Nov 27, 2021 16:31:20   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Cuda2020 wrote:
And there it is...the rights reasoning... if it's not illegal, we *can* do it, forget about the fact that is unethical or immoral, this is their podium and their stance they live by, pure perversions of moralities. GOP~RIP


The Great Unraveling

I think chump is leading the charge.

Unethical, immoral "R" us, lol

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.